Jewish World Review May 24, 2002 / 13 Sivan, 5762

Leonard Pitts, Jr.

Leonard Pitts, Jr.
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Has your life changed since 9/11?

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Help me with this, if you don't mind.

In the weeks and months after Sept. 11, the federal government issued a seemingly endless stream of terrorism alerts, warning that something bad might happen sometime soon someplace in America. How did you respond? Did you change your daily routine? Did you avoid the mall? Did you take off from work or keep the kids out of school?

Or did you just go about your business - resolved, perhaps, to be vigilant, but resigned to the fact that, in the absence of more specific information, there wasn't much else you could do? And if that's the case, as I suspect it is, then can somebody explain to me the mob that gathered with pitchforks and torches on the White House lawn last week?

I mean, I enjoy tarring and feathering a chief executive as much as the next guy, but I can't fathom the flap that has sprung up over revelations about a briefing President Bush received before Sept. 11. We learned last week that the president was told in August that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida network was planning an attack against the United States and that it might involve hijacking an airliner. The classified CIA briefing did not, according to the White House, contain any information more exact than that - certainly nothing that might lead to the conclusion that an atrocity such as the one that happened a month later was in the offing. Based on that, it's difficult to imagine what Bush might have done differently.

And yet, also based on that, Democrats in Washington spent much of last week threatening congressional investigation and howling for Bush skin. Yes, this most secretive of White Houses should have divulged the information sooner. But it's a long leap from there to imputing ineptness or malfeasance on the part of the president. Last week, though, it was a leap senators like Hillary Clinton seemed all too eager to make. Nor did presidential defenders like Vice President Cheney cover themselves with glory by responding with suggestions that asking questions about this was somehow in bad taste if not downright treasonous.

It's enough to make you want to grab the whole sorry lot of them by the collar and shake them till their eyes rattle like something out of a Warner Bros. cartoon. For criminy sake, boys and girls, there's a war going on, in case you forgot.

For the record: I didn't vote for George W. Bush and have never been favorably impressed by his cognitive abilities. But do I believe he would have stopped the Sept. 11 attacks if he'd had half a chance? Yes. Do I believe he had half a chance? No. Does anybody seriously believe otherwise?

What bothers me is not that questions are being asked, but the wrong questions are being asked. Questions designed to gain or deny political advantage rather than questions designed to elicit, well ... answers.

The salient fact here is that warning signs were missed. And while hindsight is the very soul of perfection, it's difficult to consider the hints we had before that awful day without wondering if we could not, indeed, have prevented a mass murder. Consider: You had the CIA warning about possible hijackings, an FBI agent in Phoenix suspicious that terrorists were training at U.S. flight schools, FBI agents in Minneapolis investigating Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker.

Like the proverbial blind men attempting to describe the elephant, we had the pieces to the puzzle, but couldn't put it together. Seems like smart analysts coordinating incoming information would have been able to make the connection. Why didn't that happen? Are our information-sharing systems that inefficient? Our bureaucracies that cumbersome? The interagency turf battles that fierce? If so, what's being done to correct the situation?

Speaking as a citizen, I want answers now. Because the next attack is in the planning stages now.

Some of the nation's leaders seem to have forgotten that, seem all too ready to pause here for a little game of politics. Granted, it's their natural inclination to point fingers of blame and try to mount one another's heads on pikes. But the countdown to the next atrocity is under way.

And right now, we just don't have the time for games.

Comment on JWR contributor Leonard Pitts, Jr.'s column by clicking here.

05/19/02: New world disorder is nothing to smile about
05/14/02: White men can jump, so why do black kids come up short in the classroom?
05/03/02: Catholic Church should be ashamed for blaming abuse victims
04/19/02: A reminder of how small the world has become
04/16/02: 100 death-penalty mistakes and counting
04/12/02: Until all the bad guys wear black hats
04/10/02: Connecting with history with hope for future
04/08/02: Just me and the boys: A black father's road trip
03/26/02: It's time to give up fighting the good fight and join the masses
03/22/02: It's not the art, it's the artist who's troubling
03/19/02: Don't ask, don't tell when it comes to police work
03/15/02: Do we have an inalienable right to TV?
03/12/02: What will we learn about ourselves as war toll grows?
03/08/02: Marriage madness --- oh, please!
03/05/02: A risk free life
03/01/02: Pentagon's idea of lying to media was breathtaking' in its stupidity
02/16/02: Will the Afghans forgive the U.S. for the beating of innocents?
02/15/02: In search of manhood, some make a fatal decision
02/08/02: Time for blacks to give the same respect they demand
02/05/02: A question of character and "unlawful combatants"
01/31/02: There's only so much a parent can influence a child
01/29/02: Mike Tyson is incapable of embarrassment
01/25/02: Acts of patriotism or acts of desecration?
01/18/02: Waiting for tears in the rain at Ground Zero
01/15/02: A little cultural respect works both ways
01/11/02: Can blacks be racist?
01/07/02: What price for the priceless?
12/21/01: An intriguing study on race
12/18/01: To err is me
12/14/01: Admit it, folks, If you've ever been 16, you can probably relate to Walker
12/11/01: Blacks-on-blacks poll is a healthy project
12/07/01: The best defense against government excesses
12/05/01: Better hoist caution flag
12/03/01: Martin Luther Ka-CHING!
11/27/01: Beauty reflects an ugly truth
11/22/01: Another reason to be thankful
11/19/01: If only they knew our names
11/12/01: Watching a 'dying' man live
08/01/01: Should a man be put in jail for what he's thinking?
07/27/01: It's your responsibility to invade their privacy
07/20/01: Is optimism for fools?
07/17/01: Everybody should have a white man

© 2002, The Miami Herald