Did Kamala Harris just destroy her 2028 chances? Is Gavin Newsom glad she did?

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

Democrats, despite their hypersensitive, bleeding-heart reputation, can be harsh. Ruthless, even.

When it comes to picking their presidential nominee, it's often one and done. Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore and John Kerry were embraced and then, after leading their party to disappointing defeat, cast off like so many wads of wet tissue.

Compare that with Republicans, who not only believe in second chances but, more often than not, seem to prefer their presidential candidates recycled. Over the last half century, all but a few of the GOP's nominees have had at least one failed White House bid on their resume.

The roster of retreads includes the current occupant of the Oval Office, who is only the second president in U.S. history to regain the perch after losing it four years prior.

Why the difference? It would take a psychologist or geneticist to determine if there's something in the minds or molecular makeup of party faithful, which could explain their varied treatment of those humbled and vanquished.

Regardless, it suggests the blowback facing Kamala Harris and the campaign diary she published last week is happening right on cue.

And it doesn't portend well for another try at the White House in 2028, should the former vice president and U.S. senator from California pursue that path.

The criticism has come in assorted flavors.

Joe Biden loyalists — many of whom were never great fans of Harris — have bristled at her relatively mild criticisms of the obviously aged and physically declining president. (She leaves it to her husband, former Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, to vent about the "impossible, s — jobs" Harris was given and, in spite of that, the failure of the president and first lady to defend Harris during her low points.)

The notable lack of self-blame has rankled other Democrats. Aside from some couldas and shouldas, Harris largely ascribes her defeat to insufficient time to make her case to voters — just 107 days, the title of her book — which hardly sits well with those who feel Harris squandered the time she did have.

More generally, some Democrats fault the former vice president for resurfacing, period, rather than slinking off and disappearing forever into some deep, dark hole. It's a familiar gripe each time the party struggles to move past a presidential defeat; Hillary Clinton faced a similar backlash when she published her inside account after losing to Donald Trump in 2016.

That critique assumes great masses of voters devour campaign memoirs with the same voracious appetite as those who surrender their Sundays to the Beltway chat shows, or mainline political news like a continuous IV drip.

They do not.

Let the record show Democrats won the White House in 2020 even though Clinton bobbed back up in 2017 and, for a short while, thwarted the party's fervent desire to "turn the page."

But there are those avid consumers of campaigns and elections, and for the political fiends among us Harris offers plenty of fizz, much of it involving her party peers and prospective 2028 rivals.

Pete Buttigieg, the meteoric star of the 2020 campaign, was her heartfelt choice for vice president, but Harris said she feared the combination of a Black woman and gay running mate would exceed the load-bearing capacity of the electorate. (News to me, Buttigieg said after Harris revealed her thinking, and an underestimation of the American people.)

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, the runner-up to Harris' ultimate vice presidential pick, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, comes across as unseemly salivating and greedily lusting after the job. (He fired back by suggesting Harris has some splainin' to do about what she knew of Biden's infirmities and when she knew it.)

Harris implies Govs. JB Pritzker and Gretchen Whitmer of Illinois and Michigan, respectively, were insufficiently gung-ho after Biden stepped aside and she became the Democratic nominee-in-waiting.

But for California readers, the most toothsome morsel involves Harris' longtime frenemy, Gov. Gavin Newsom.

The two, who rose to political power in the early 2000s on parallel tracks in San Francisco, have long had a complicated relationship, mixing mutual aid with jealousy and jostling.

In her book, Harris recounts the hours after Biden's sudden withdrawal, when she began telephoning top Democrats around the country to lock in their support. In contrast to the enthusiasm many displayed, Newsom responded tersely with a text message: "Hiking. Will call back."

He never did, Harris noted, pointedly, though Newsom did issue a full-throated endorsement within hours, which the former vice president failed to mention.

It's small-bore stuff. But the fact Harris chose to include that anecdote speaks to the tetchiness underlying the warmth and fuzziness that California's two most prominent Democrats put on public display.

Will the two face off in 2028?

Riding the promotional circuit, Harris has repeatedly sidestepped the inevitable questions about another possible presidential bid.

"That's not my focus right now," she told Rachel Maddow, in a standard-issue non-denial denial. For his part, Newsom is obviously running, though he won't say so.

There would be something operatic, or at least soap-operatic, about the two longtime competitors openly vying for the country's ultimate political prize — though it's hard to see Democrats, with their persistent hunger for novelty, turning to Harris or her left-coast political doppelganger as their savior.

Meantime, the two are back on parallel tracks, though seemingly headed in opposite directions.

While Newsom is looking to build Democratic bridges, Harris is burning hers down.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Mark Z. Barabak
Los Angeles Times/(TNS)

Mark Z. Barabak is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, focusing on politics in California and the West.

Previously:
• 08/26/25 Power grab may energize Newsom and Dems. But it won't fix their bigger problem
• 07/16/25 He tried to keep Trump from a second term. But six months in, 'I'm very impressed.'
• 06/05/25 Yelling, finger-pointing and cursing galore as California Dems gather near Disneyland
• 05/13/25 Gavin Newsom wants to be president. Not so fast!
• 04/02/25 America has gotten ruder. Starting at the very top
• 03/14/25 Newsom's next step --- to self-destruction
• 12/31/24 History gets Jimma Carter wrong --- both underrated and overrated
• 12/03/24 She's won twice in Trump country. Will the Dems listen to her?
• 11/14/24 Call Adam Schiff what you want. California's next senator is ready to work with Trump
• 11/13/24 America's last presidential bellwether ends its winning streak
• 11/13/23 Overwhelmed? Confused? Here's what to make of all those presidential polls
• 09/18/23 How labor and a wily senator turned Nevada blue --- and redrew the nation's presidential map
• 07/13/23 Here's why California will be the 2024 presidential kingmaker. (Just kidding)
• 06/19/23 Barbara Boxer warns progressives to back off on Dianne Feinstein or they may be sorry
• 06/15/23 He's gay and Republican. And no longer makes apologies
• 05/23/23 Feinstein is not going to quit the Senate. Ever. Just ask her biographer
• 02/07/23 Here's why Joe Biden won't be dumping Kamala Harris as his running mate
• 09/29/22 Is abortion issue a lifeline that saves the Senate for Dems? This race offers a test case
• 07/25/22 Don't underestimate Kamala Harris. She's still the Dem most likely to succeed Biden
• 05/17/22 RINOS V. DINOS: Oregon race a referendum on nation's direction of Dems
• 04/14/22 What if everyone is required to vote? Would that help cure America's political ills?
• 02/18/22 Where's the love? Here's why Kamala Harris' California poll numbers stink
• 02/18/22 From uber-liberal San Fran, school board recall is a three-alarm warning for Dems nationwide
• 12/09/21 So you think Kamala Harris has it rough. Remember Dan Quayle?
• 01/17/13 A RINO in Frisco