|
Jewish World Review Dec. 29, 1998 /10 Teves, 5759
Thomas Sowell
The time is now
(JWR) --- (http://www.jewishworldreview.com) NOW THAT BILL CLINTON has been impeached, brace yourself for a lot of
hysteria and a lot of lies. A Senate trial is being depicted as a terrible
trauma that would be just too much of an ordeal to be inflicted on the
American people.
Ask yourself: How much have you personally suffered as a result of the
impeachment in the House of Representatives? How much sleep did you lose?
How many headaches did you have? Did you even have to postpone your
Christmas shopping to get yourself together?
Of course not. Nor will a Senate trial cause us to collapse like a house of
cards. Nobody is forced to watch it or read about it. If the public is bored
with it and stops watching, the major TV networks are unlikely to keep
broadcasting it, even if it is still shown on C-SPAN or some of the cable
networks.
When the impeachment of Richard Nixon was before Congress, we were in the
midst of a war in Vietnam that was far bigger than Clinton's four-day
bombing of Iraq. Within a week after Nixon resigned, the stock market began
rising.
The sky is not going to fall, no matter what happens to Bill Clinton.
All the desperate ingenuity that has gone into trying to concoct some
meaningless compromise like "censure" might lead us to think that
impeachment was something inhuman like flogging or hanging. It is not. Even
conviction in the Senate would lead to nothing worse than an early departure
from the White House for the Clintons -- and no doubt multimillion dollar
book deals for both of them soon thereafter.
The orchestrated hysteria over what a trauma a Senate trial will be for us
all is just a continuation of the political spinning that has been going on
ever since Clinton got into trouble and had to create distractions from his
own wrong-doing. Opinion polls show that the public has fallen for a lot of
it.
Thank heaven there were enough people in the House of Representatives with
enough character to recognize the high stakes when a president thumbs his
nose at the law, no matter how many times the spin masters talk about sex
and "private" behavior. Perjury is not private behavior and neither is
obstruction of justice. Both undermine the whole foundation of law that the
president takes an oath to uphold.
Those in the House of Representatives who saw through the smokescreen of
disinformation and distractions, and who had the courage to buck the polls,
deserve credit for sticking to their duty. They certainly deserve a lot
better than having the rug pulled out from under them with some "deal" in
the Senate that allows perjury and obstruction of justice to escape the
penalties that the Constitution provides for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Talk about how apologetic or contrite Bill Clinton is or isn't misses the
whole point. This is not about one individual. It is about the future of
this country. Whether he pays the price or escapes through some deal, that
fact is going to be known across the length and breadth of the United States
of America. It is going to be known to our children -- and no amount of
rhetoric is going to turn a wrist slap into anything other than a wrist slap
that says, loud and clear, that he got away with it.
Far worse, future presidents will be left a blueprint for how they too can
operate above the law. Lie, stonewall, evade, redefine, corrupt witnesses
and launch campaigns of character assassination against all who expose or
challenge you. The enormous powers of the presidency can be used for all
these purposes -- and can be deployed to cover up things far worse than
cheap sex in the Oval Office.
A cop-out for Clinton would open a Pandora's box. That is why it is not
just Bill Clinton who will be on trial in the Senate. The Senators
themselves will be on trial before the judgment of history.
They will be on trial for their clarity of mind in seeing through the
rhetoric and red herrings concocted by the White House spin-masters. They
will be on trial for their courage and steadfastness in resisting the easy
way out and the habit of playing let's-make-a-deal.
Public opinion matters. But that opinion has already begun to change and
the Senate's actions can change it some more. At the very least, Senators do
not take an oath to uphold the opinion polls, but to uphold the
12/23/98: World-class hypocrisy
12/21/98: The spreading corruption
12/17/98: Politically "contrite"
12/16/98: Polls and partisanship
12/14/98: The "non-profit" halo
12/11/98: Corruption and confusion
12/03/98: The health care "crisis"
11/30/98: Knowing what you are talking about
11/23/98: The impeachment legacy
11/23/98: Random thoughts
11/19/98: Tales out of bureaucracies
11/16/98: Scholarships based on scholarship
11/12/98: Forward march
11/09/98: Moral outrage
11/05/98: Will the Republicans ever learn?
11/02/98: A voter's duty
10/30/98: The poverty pimp's poem
10/29/98: Random thoughts on the election
10/27/98: "Partisan" and "unfair"
10/23/98: Ed-u-kai-tchun
10/21/98: McGwire, Maris and the Babe
10/20/98: MURDER IS MURDER!
10/16/98: Lightweight Boxer
10/14/98: A strange word
10/09/98: Impeachment standards
10/08/98: Alternatives to seriousness
10/07/98: Heredity, environment and talk
10/02/98: A much-needed guide
10/01/98: Starr's real crime
9/24/98: Costs and power
9/18/98: Are we sheep?
9/16/98: Judicial review
9/15/98: Hillary Rodham Crook?
9/14/98: Taking stock
9/11/98: Moment of truth
9/04/98: Random thoughts
8/31/98: The twilight of special prosecutors?
8/26/98: "Doing a good job"
8/24/98: America on trial?
8/19/98: Played for fools
8/17/98: A childish letter
8/11/98: Hiding behind a woman
8/07/98: A flying walrus in Washington?
8/03/98: "Affordability" strikes again
7/31/98: Random thoughts
7/27/98: Faith and mountains
7/24/98: Clinton in Wonderland
7/20/98: Where is black 'leadership' leading?
7/16/98: Do 'minorities' really have it that bad?
7/14/98: Race dialogue: same old stuff
7/10/98: Honest history
7/09/98: Dumb is dangerous
7/02/98: Gun-safety starts with
parental responsibility
6/30/98: When more is less
6/29/98: Are educators above the law?
6/26/98: Random Thoughts
6/24/98: An angry letter
6/22/98: Sixties sentimentalism
6/19/98:Dumbing down anti-trust
6/15/98: A changing of the guard?
6/11/98: Presidential privileges
6/8/98: Fast computers and slow antitrust
6/3/98: Can stalling backfire?
5/29/98: The insulation of the Left
5/25/98: Missing the point in the media
5/22/98: The lessons of Indonesia
5/20/98: Smart but silent
5/18/98: Israel, Clinton and character
5/14/98: Monica Lewinsky's choices
5/11/98: Random thoughts
5/7/98: Media obstruction of justice
5/4/98: Dangerous "safety"
5/1/98:
Abolish Adolescence!
4/30/98: The naked truth
4/22/98: Playing fair and square
4/19/98: Bad teachers"
4/15/98: "Clinton in Africa
"
4/13/98: "Bundling and unbundling
"
4/9/98: "Rising or falling Starr
"
4/6/98: "Was Clinton ‘vindicated'?
"
3/26/98: "Diasters -- natural and political"
3/24/98: "A pattern of behavior"
3/22/98: Innocent explanations
3/19/98: Kathleen Willey and Anita Hill
3/17/98: Search and destroy
3/12/98: Media Circus versus Justice
3/6/98: Vindication
3/3/98: Cheap Shot Time
2/26/98: The Wrong Filter
2/24/98: Trial by Media
2/20/98: Dancing Around the Realities
2/19/98: A "Do Something" War?
2/12/98: Julian Simon, combatant in a 200-year war
2/6/98: A rush to rhetoric