Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 16, 2004 / 27 Sivan 5764

Amity Shlaes

Amity Shlaes
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

What de Gaulle can teach us about Iraq | The Allies decide to dump their man, the very exile they groomed to take over after the liberation. His transgressions have been breathtaking. The man is an ingrate. He is arrogant.

He endangers the Allies' war effort. He flirts with betrayal, consorting with dubious regimes and conducting what the White House calls "secret and personal machinations." In the end, it is the president himself who makes the call: "We must get rid of him."

These lines might describe Washington's official view of Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress, the former exile whom the U.S. has just excluded from Iraq's new leadership. But they are about Charles de Gaulle, the French exile from Hitler's regime who went on to define postwar France. Today we see de Gaulle as an inevitable hero, Mr. Good War. In his day, however, de Gaulle was a problematic partner whose wartime relationship with the U.S. and Britain was nearly as volatile as is Chalabi's with the U.S. It is worthwhile to set aside the event that seems to have led to Chalabi's exclusion, the alleged betrayal of U.S. secrets to Iran, and to look instead at de Gaulle. The French leader's trajectory reveals much about both exiled patriots and U.S. failings generally when it comes to managing them.

The story starts in France after World War I with a military preoccupied with constructing its defensive barrier, the Maginot Line. De Gaulle, a lonely officer known as much for his pride as for his ideas, argued that France must think offensively instead. Like Chalabi, who spent years describing his vision of a free Iraq to anyone who would listen, de Gaulle was a man obsessed. This cost him a promotion, denied by the French military command. Still, de Gaulle was persistent, so much so that he even managed to infuriate his mentor, Marshal Henri Philippe Petain.

This combative pattern continued when de Gaulle arrived in London after Germany's invasion of France. De Gaulle instantly declared the existence of Free France. But, as was supposedly the case with Chalabi, the number of followers who then emerged was not impressive. As de Gaulle later recalled: "This almost general abstention of French personalities vis-a-vis my enterprise did not raise its credit in the eyes of the world."

Donate to JWR

It was British Prime Minister Winston Churchill who made de Gaulle, giving him aircraft, friends and plentiful airtime on the BBC. This was like the tens of millions of dollars the U.S. Congress voted to Chalabi in the 1990s. Still, de Gaulle went out of his way to antagonize Churchill. Like Chalabi in Iran, de Gaulle traveled to Africa to build his own alliances, an activity Churchill deemed "most dangerous" for military campaigns.

De Gaulle also went to Russia's representative to ask if his Free France movement might base itself in Russia instead of London. Though Russia was an ally, this was a form of treachery. Yet de Gaulle persisted, despite garden lectures from Winston's wife, Clementine, on how it is important "to hate one's enemies more than one's friends." Churchill for his part came down on de Gaulle with all the vehemence of a Paul Bremer (the U.S. administrator in Iraq who clashed with Chalabi). There was "nothing hostile to England this man may not do when he gets off the chain," he said. He also dressed down the general directly: "You keep on saying that you are France. I do not recognize you as France!"

Yet de Gaulle's relations with Franklin D. Roosevelt were even worse. FDR allowed Mark Clark, the U.S. Army general, to strike a deal with Jean-Francois Darlan, the Vichy general. De Gaulle saw this battlefield step as the U.S. legitimization of Vichy in the same visceral way that Chalabi reacted to decisions to include Baath party members in the new Iraq. De Gaulle said it was "a strategic error to flout the moral character of this war." FDR wanted de Gaulle out and only changed his mind later.

To be sure, Chalabi is not de Gaulle. For one thing, de Gaulle reconciled with his patrons before occupation, whereas Chalabi's decisive falling-out came after occupation. What's more, the charges against Chalabi specifically, that he told Iran the U.S. had cracked its secret codes, are serious. Still, those charges are not proven. Meanwhile, de Gaulle's story recalls two things.

First, that leaders in exile are not convenient personalities. Anyone determined enough to nurse a dream for decades despite a death sentence over his head is not a compromising type. Inconvenience is valuable. A proxy puppet is fine in wartime, but in postwar periods only an independent mind can lead. De Gaulle caused enormous trouble in the quarter-century following the war, dividing NATO and developing nuclear weapons. Still, he was clearly good for France. Indeed, to survive, exiled leaders must show independence to get a following at home.

The second point is that loyalty to the Allies' friends is crucial to foreign policy success. When ultimately the U.S. and United Kingdom did allow de Gaulle to march at the liberation, Frenchmen saw that the Allies had followed through. That inspired their confidence in themselves, the Allies and de Gaulle.

What works less well is betraying your exile friends midbattle. And the U.S. betrays them routinely. Seeing Chalabi's face behind the cracked glass, one thinks of the Cubans whom the U.S. shipped off to the Bay of Pigs and then failed to back up; or of the Iraqis the U.S. let down in the mid-1990s after urging them to rebel. Such inconsistency generated nation-size tragedies. It can today as well.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Financial Times . Her latest book is The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. Send your comments by clicking here.


05/18/04: Why trade matters in a time of war: Promising steps by U.S. and EU against protectionism
05/12/04: Let's face it, planning your life to reduce your tax bill is a time-honored and legal tradition
04/29/04: Being caught between 2 complicated syndromes: The high cost of living in big cities and the progressive structure of the U.S. tax code
04/20/04: Kerry's ‘Misery Index’ is just sad
04/15/04: John Kerry's ‘tax the rich’ mantra won't get the jobs done
04/02/04: Faithful following at the White House
02/25/04: It's back to the Dark Ages on trade
02/20/04: Trust the U.S. or trust Al Qaeda
02/12/04: A Political Year of Yalies: Boola Boola for Meritocracy
02/04/04: Here's what America doesn't need: Another New Deal
01/15/04: Forget Mars, U.S. economy looking like the final frontier
12/30/03: Bob Bartley put morality's place in the market economy
12/18/03: Mission accomplished: 1991's, that is
12/11/03: Shrugging off outdated data: Inside America's economic machine
11/13/03: Leaving a little something for the kids? Good luck
11/05/03: Never, Never will we Desist
09/30/03: Tax, lies and a few supply-side parables 10/09/03: Free markets are the key to rebuilding Iraq

09/25/03: Don't be sentimental, Mr. Bush
08/12/02: Howard Dean, Robin Hood
05/29/02: Berlin Diarist: To believe that by self-improvement and restraint, we can end tyranny
03/27/02: The curse of oil
11/12/02: Political Correctness at the Fed (No joke!)
10/31/02: Local enforcer who has changed national laws
10/12/02: No Mirror for Europe; US is a picture of unity
08/14/02: Keeping your financial eggs at home
07/24/02: New Democrats' unaffordable luxury
06/26/02: The evolution of eminent domain is the story of the lasting power of Supreme Court decisions to alter the American cultural fabric
06/20/02: The distinction between known risk and uncertainty: What was lost in the Martha Stewart flap
06/11/02: Europe, long waiting for a chance to assert itself as independent from the US on the world stage, is clueless to terror's threat
06/04/02: A Cold Warrior's lessons for the Middle East
05/21/02: Geography does matter when it comes to development, but aid must nonetheless be linked to good governance
05/14/02: The increasing number of new claims is hurting innocent companies and making a mockery of the Common Law system
05/09/02: Aid, development and guilt in our times of terror
04/30/02: Wine lovers may at last be able to stray across state borders. The Internet is coming to the aide of free trade
04/23/02: Taxation by way of Madison Avenue
04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix
04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?
03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results
03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers
02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy
02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat
02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East
02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend
02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not
01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance
01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution
01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured
01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children
12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back
12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners
12/13/01: Bush opens a new era
12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party
12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff
11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?
11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds
10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur
09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes
08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book
08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress
07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?
07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts
07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse
06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee
06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth 06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland
06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade
06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq
06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?
06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful
06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill
05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction
05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence
05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers
05/14/01: Adam Smith in love
05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists
05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone
05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly
05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again.
04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs
04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top
04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers
04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door
03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver
03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar
03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy
03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession
03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America
03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence
03/05/01: Fighting the good fight
03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up
02/27/01: IT's important
02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires
02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'
02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan
02/05/01: Crack and Compassion
01/31/01: Debt is good
01/29/01: Clueless
01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking
01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind
01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait
01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator
01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience'
01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes
12/11/00: So smart they're dumb
12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush
12/04/00: The Boies factor
11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"
11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game
11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election
11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model
11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election
11/09/00: Those powerful expats
11/07/00: What's right for America versus what works
11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot
10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility
10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness
10/24/00: The most accurate poll
10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right
10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich
10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks
10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism
09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy
09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?
09/18/00: First steps to success
09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant
09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost
09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending
08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people
08/28/00: A reali$tic poll
08/21/00: "I Goofed"
08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets
08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia
07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To
07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world
07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead
07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths
07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders
07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry
07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts
06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head
06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality
06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes

© 2003, Financial Times