Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 23, 2002 /12 Iyar, 5762

Amity Shlaes

Amity Shlaes
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Taxation by way of Madison Avenue | Call it the pathetic period. That time after tax day when we take a deep breath and start glorying over the prospect of a refund. Somehow, we manage to forget that that refund was our money in the first place.

Two professors at University of Michigan have come up with an explanation for such tax docility. And the fact that one of them is a professor of marketing probably gives the whole story away. Their position is a clear one: taxpayers will engage in a very unlovely activity - paying taxes - because it is made tolerable by that great prettifier of unlovelies: clever packaging.

Consider, for starters, a process most of readers have just completed: collecting deductions. When we spend our evening hours wondering about the home office - and what about that costly bookshelf? - that last charitable deduction, those stock market losses or how many kids we have, we are really cushioning ourselves from the pain of the tax take. Every deduction we uncover represents a small consolation.

This, the authors note, is exactly why the government does deliver the most painful punch first, and then moves to the deductions. It's a clever strategy. But it is important to remember that it was not always this way: when the first income tax form was created, in 1913, taxpayers calculated their tax and then reckoned their "super tax", the extra bit they paid in progressivity.

Government has learned a lot since then, and now plays the deductions game like Tiger Woods. And taxpayers have become addicted. So much so that going back to the old system of one simple rate, and few or no deductions is close to politically impossible, as the flat taxers can attest.

Another way lawmakers and the government trick the taxpayer is by finding ways to quantify taxes so they don't seem so high. "During the 2000 presidential campaign, Al Gore derided George W. Bush's tax cut plan on the grounds that the average family would get about enough money to buy one extra Diet Coke a day - about 62 cents," writes Joel Slemrod, an author of the study.

"His framing effort was clear in comparison to referring to the Bush plan as a $1.6 trillion tax cut over 10 years."

For European readers the trillion dollar number is particularly frightening, since it is larger than the scale of tax cuts that could be written in Europe. That, of course, is true because Europe's economies are not as big as that of the US. But few tax debaters on the international scene acknowledge this: they just use the T-word to demagogue for the argument that the cut is large.

Then there is the culture of the refund. Tax preparation firms have learned to arbitrage refunds lost by selling "fast rebates" or "instant rebates", especially to poorer members of society. What they neglect to highlight is that they charge sky-high rates of interest for providing this service, at something close to no risk to themselves. In other words, we treasure our consolation rebate so much that we are willing to pay even more for the pleasure of experiencing it.

But the largest tax marketing success of the past hundred years is that great beast, progressivity. Progressivity is so successful in part because most Americans don't understand it. People tend to confuse their "average rate" with their "marginal rate". Nobody wants to betray ignorance by raising the obvious question: is progressivity fair, or logical?

The real Madison Avenue-style genius, though, was in the term progressivity (instead of the old super tax or "graduated surcharge"). Progressivity sounds magnanimous.

The University of Michigan study provides food for thought on the dangers of the Value Added Tax, a system common in Europe but not in the US. The clever part of the VAT is that VAT taxes are collected at every stage of production, rendering them close to invisible. At the end, there is no VAT breakout, either. Most Europeans think a E5 item is a E5 item, without asking what part of that price is tax.

If you don't mind being manipulated like a laboratory rat, this all may be fine with you. But the marketing game has worked so well that it conceals the hidden economic dangers of our illogical tax apparatus. These days the big question on the economic table is whether the residential real estate market is overvalued, and set for the sort of massive correction equities have seen.

In tax terms, forecaster Brian Wesbury of GKST, the Chicago-based broker, says the answer would have to be yes. That is because homes are about the only area around that are tax-advantaged to the hilt. So citizens have invested (ie borrowed) beyond anything homes' true values can sustain, distorting, perhaps perilously. Alan Greenspan, Fed chairman, reinforced just this point in his testimony yesterday. the bedrock market on which consumer confidence rests.

And a Happy Tax Season to you, too.

JWR contributor Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Financial Times . Her latest book is The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. Send your comments by clicking here.


04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix
04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?
03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results
03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers
02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy
02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat
02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East
02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend
02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not
01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance
01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution
01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured
01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children
12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back
12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners
12/13/01: Bush opens a new era
12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party
12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff
11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?
11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds
10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur
09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes
08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book
08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress
07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?
07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts
07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse
06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee
06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth 06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland
06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade
06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq
06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?
06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful
06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill
05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction
05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence
05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers
05/14/01: Adam Smith in love
05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists
05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone
05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly
05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again.
04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs
04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top
04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers
04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door
03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver
03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar
03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy
03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession
03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America
03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence
03/05/01: Fighting the good fight
03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up
02/27/01: IT's important
02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires
02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'
02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan
02/05/01: Crack and Compassion
01/31/01: Debt is good
01/29/01: Clueless
01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking
01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind
01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait
01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator
01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience'
01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes
12/11/00: So smart they're dumb
12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush
12/04/00: The Boies factor
11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"
11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game
11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election
11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model
11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election
11/09/00: Those powerful expats
11/07/00: What's right for America versus what works
11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot
10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility
10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness
10/24/00: The most accurate poll
10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right
10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich
10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks
10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism
09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy
09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?
09/18/00: First steps to success
09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant
09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost
09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending
08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people
08/28/00: A reali$tic poll
08/21/00: "I Goofed"
08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets
08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia
07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To
07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world
07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead
07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths
07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders
07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry
07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts
06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head
06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality
06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes

© 2001, Financial Times