Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 25, 2003 / 28 Menachem-Av, 5763

Amity Shlaes

Amity Shlaes
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Don't be sentimental, Mr. Bush | President Bush's "compassionate conservatism" has attracted imitators around the world. But Bush wannabes beware: At home, the label often lands the president in trouble.

This summer, for example, the U.S. economy has yielded some spectacular productivity numbers. Yet Bush's opponents are arguing that the new data prove him to be a heartless corporate type. For what is increased productivity but increased profiteering if it is not accompanied by strong job creation? And there has been no strong job creation: Unemployment is significant, even "high" at more than 6 percent, as Howard Dean, one of the contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination, has noted. The situation is so dire, says Dick Gephardt, a Democratic fellow hopeful, that the best way to ensure that the U.S. economic engine survives is to impose a worldwide minimum wage (an ambition worthy of a German). At a presidential debate this week, the Democrats will vie in their attacks on Bush economics.

The argument that the president has failed sounds exaggerated, given that the U.S. economy on the whole has fared well under him, notwithstanding big market corrections and Sept. 11, 2001. And it seems downright crazy when we consider the economy's postwar record.

Start with that troublingly jobless productivity increase.

Productivity is a simple concept: widgets produced, divided by input. Labor often dominates the input figure. It is therefore difficult to generate high productivity and substantial employment increases at the same time. The very phrase "jobless productivity" is close to a tautology.

Donate to JWR

But that does not mean productivity gains are not good for workers in the longer run. For one thing, when companies make the sort of profits U.S. corporations are announcing now, they tend to pay better wages to the workers they do employ. They also tend to invest in projects that eventually create yet more jobs--perhaps not precisely the same sort of jobs, but more jobs nonetheless. If this were not true, what with the productivity gains of the past three centuries, we would all be unemployed by now.

High productivity is in any case better than other sorts of productivity--weak, middling--that the U.S. experienced in the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s. Indeed, in those days it was low productivity numbers that were said to presage U.S. decline.

In 1980, concern about Japanese success and low U.S. productivity led Congress to pass the Bayh-Dole Act, which permitted universities to patent ideas or research that they had developed with federal funds. It is revealing that Japan, doubtless in a mood of similar desperation, passed its own version of Bayh-Dole about four years ago.

Some commentators worried that low productivity was such a persistent problem that it would drive the U.S. to become a protectionist stronghold. Other commentators blamed President Ronald Reagan's administration. Even as recently as the early 1990s, editors at U.S. financial papers were hosting teas for famous economists at which everyone would speculate as to when, if ever, productivity might resurge.

Which brings us to the second Bush datum, unemployment.

This is a more genuine problem. Many hundreds of thousands of Americans have failed to find replacements for the jobs they lost after the 2000 market highs. Here the campaigning Democrats are right: America needs to create more work. But unemployment, while significant at 6.1 percent, is not high compared with what most American adults have experienced.

In the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s, economists and politicians alike believed that 6 percent or so was the "natural" rate of unemployment, below which there would be dangerous inflation. Kevin Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute points out that in the early 1990s, unemployment fell so low that President Bill Clinton began a campaign to cut unemployment insurance benefits from 30-plus weeks to 26.

That dangerously "low" rate was 6.8 percent.

Which brings us back to Bush and his compassion.

Recently, he has announced several compassionate initiatives, including "re-employment accounts." These sound like modern private-sector Republican projects but are really Democratic-type cash payments for training, day care and so on for the unemployed. On Labor Day, Bush also announced that he would establish a "jobs czar." This recalls the 1970s, not a decade that reflects well on presidential economics.

It is easy to see what moves Bush. He feels for the unemployed. Who doesn't? And he reckons that the election cycle moves faster than the Schumpeterian economic cycle.

Still, hedging weakens his general argument, which is, or ought to be, that his rather significant tax cuts and other pro-growth measures will in the end serve the compassionate cause of job creation. Better, certainly, than any sentimental motto.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Financial Times . Her latest book is The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. Send your comments by clicking here.


08/12/02: Howard Dean, Robin Hood
05/29/02: Berlin Diarist: To believe that by self-improvement and restraint, we can end tyranny
03/27/02: The curse of oil
11/12/02: Political Correctness at the Fed (No joke!)
10/31/02: Local enforcer who has changed national laws
10/12/02: No Mirror for Europe; US is a picture of unity
08/14/02: Keeping your financial eggs at home
07/24/02: New Democrats' unaffordable luxury
06/26/02: The evolution of eminent domain is the story of the lasting power of Supreme Court decisions to alter the American cultural fabric
06/20/02: The distinction between known risk and uncertainty: What was lost in the Martha Stewart flap
06/11/02: Europe, long waiting for a chance to assert itself as independent from the US on the world stage, is clueless to terror's threat
06/04/02: A Cold Warrior's lessons for the Middle East
05/21/02: Geography does matter when it comes to development, but aid must nonetheless be linked to good governance
05/14/02: The increasing number of new claims is hurting innocent companies and making a mockery of the Common Law system
05/09/02: Aid, development and guilt in our times of terror
04/30/02: Wine lovers may at last be able to stray across state borders. The Internet is coming to the aide of free trade
04/23/02: Taxation by way of Madison Avenue
04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix
04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?
03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results
03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers
02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy
02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat
02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East
02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend
02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not
01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance
01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution
01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured
01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children
12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back
12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners
12/13/01: Bush opens a new era
12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party
12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff
11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?
11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds
10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur
09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes
08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book
08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress
07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?
07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts
07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse
06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee
06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth 06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland
06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade
06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq
06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?
06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful
06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill
05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction
05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence
05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers
05/14/01: Adam Smith in love
05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists
05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone
05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly
05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again.
04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs
04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top
04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers
04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door
03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver
03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar
03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy
03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession
03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America
03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence
03/05/01: Fighting the good fight
03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up
02/27/01: IT's important
02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires
02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'
02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan
02/05/01: Crack and Compassion
01/31/01: Debt is good
01/29/01: Clueless
01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking
01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind
01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait
01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator
01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience'
01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes
12/11/00: So smart they're dumb
12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush
12/04/00: The Boies factor
11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"
11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game
11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election
11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model
11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election
11/09/00: Those powerful expats
11/07/00: What's right for America versus what works
11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot
10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility
10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness
10/24/00: The most accurate poll
10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right
10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich
10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks
10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism
09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy
09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?
09/18/00: First steps to success
09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant
09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost
09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending
08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people
08/28/00: A reali$tic poll
08/21/00: "I Goofed"
08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets
08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia
07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To
07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world
07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead
07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths
07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders
07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry
07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts
06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head
06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality
06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes

© 2001, Financial Times