|
|
|
Jewish World Review Oct. 22, 2003 / 26 Tishrei, 5764
James Lileks
Let's make Greenpeace pay
Now add this twist: The government files charges against the prolife group
that sent the activists. You might be thinking, "About time! Hit 'em with that
RICO stick again, G-men." Intimidation and violence have no place in civil
society. Someone wants to protest, he can stand on the other side of the
street; if someone wants to play Tony Soprano and send his goons into a
private business, well, he should hardly be exempt from prosecution.
Back to the real world. Last year Greenpeace members invaded a cargo ship.
They sped alongside in a dinghy, clambered up a ladder, jumped on deck and
unfurled the all-important banner, the text of which demanded that President
Bush do something about illegal mahogany imports.
(Remember how some said Iraq would be a distraction from the war on
Al-Qaida? Imagine how it's hurt the war on international cellulose-smuggling
syndicates.)
The protesters spent a weekend in jail. And now federal prosecutors are
charging the people who approved the boarding: Greenpeace itself.
Will the same people who cheered the first example support the second?
The First Amendment will survive. Greenpeace can go door-to-door, run
Web sites, organize marches and do all the other things we associate with
peaceable protest. But if the board of directors instructs the troops to start
heaving bricks through store windows, it ought to pay.
Granted, boarding a ship is not necessarily a violent act. Neither is driving
your car into your neighbor's garage, running into his house and chanting
pro-recycling slogans. It would, however, be illegal. Yes, yes, a small and
inconvenient fact when compared to the moral gravity of recycling, but some
diehards still cling to the sanctity of private property.
Remember: Feeling passionate about your cause does not make you exude a
special chemical that renders you immune to all laws.
In fact, willingness to accept the consequences of your dissent actually gives
your dissent more moral weight. It's one thing to stage a lunch-counter sit-in at
a Woolworth's in a liberal Northern town, and quite another thing to try it in
the heart of Jim Crow land.
No one else will go to jail if Greenpeace is convicted. The organization could
be placed on double-secret probation, and could lose its tax-exempt status.
Chances of that happening are just about zero; the PR cost to the
administration would be horrid. As is, Greenpeace has been handed a
marvelous fundraising tool. By the time this all plays out, a good portion of the
faithful will be convinced John Ashcroft has decamped to the Amazon with a
chainsaw in one hand and a shotgun in the other, felling old trees and shooting
rare marmosets whose tears hold the cure to cancer.
But it's the principle! Dissent is being squashed like an Amazonian clusterbug!
Perhaps not. The charge, after all, is a misdemeanor. This isn't a jackboot on
the face of the brave. It's not even a slipper. More like a silk sock pressed on
Greenpeace's Birkenstock, a gentle reminder: In a time of suicide bombings,
in the post-USS Cole era, perhaps speeding up to cargo ships in small boats
and scaling the sides isn't a good idea, and might actually earn you a headful
of lead.
Nonsense, the activists insist they had "GREENPEACE" written on the
boat and on their clothing. No terrorist or pirate would ever do that; it would
be wrong! It would violate the Pirates' Code!
Uh-huh. Note to Greenpeace: We're sure you mean well, but in a world of
pain and suffering, aren't there more important causes? Even the PETA guys
probably look at you askance. Chickens suffer by the billions every day, and
Greenpeace is worried about wood?
09/29/03: Ah-nold & Clark may be on different sides of the aisles, but their supporters are cut from the same cloth
|