Jewish World Review August 30, 2004 / 13 Elul, 5764

Terry Eastland

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

To appeal to conservatives, add some nuance to compassion | George Bush's record in office invites fresh consideration of a question long asked about him: Is he a conservative? Conservatives tend to agree that on the so-called social issues – abortion, embryonic stem-cell research, marriage – the president is a conservative. But on other matters there is debate.

Mr. Bush hasn't pleased conservatives who seek to limit the size and reach of the federal establishment. Under Mr. Bush, and often at his behest, government has grown. Consider, for example, the federal role in education, now much enlarged thanks to Mr. Bush's No Child Left Behind legislation. Or the prescription drug benefit, so vigorously supported by Mr. Bush. It's expected to cost as much as $2 trillion over the next 20 years.

Nor has Mr. Bush pleased conservatives concerned about deficit spending, which has soared during his tenure. The most recent fiscal year ended with a deficit that in numerical (though not percentage) terms is our largest ever. There are various reasons for the large deficits, not least the war on terrorism, but Mr. Bush has yet to veto a single spending bill (or any bill, for that matter).

Of course, unlike Ronald Reagan, Mr. Bush didn't run for the presidency on a smaller-government, spend-less platform. Nor, departing from his father's path, has he made deficit reduction a priority.

To be sure, conservatives have long differed on that issue, with those less concerned about balanced budgets arguing that economic health depends less on the size of the deficit than on policies designed to stimulate growth.

It's fair to call Mr. Bush a "compassionate conservative," given his advocacy of "compassionate conservatism." He has explained it this way: "It is compassionate to actively help our fellow citizens in need" [a formulation that concedes a role for government]. "It is conservative to insist on responsibility and results."

Donate to JWR

Not surprisingly, Mr. Bush has described many of his policies as "compassionate conservatism," the leading example being the faith-based initiative, which seeks to enlist religious charities in the fight against poverty and other social ills. Strikingly, however, Mr. Bush often talks about his policies in terms of compassion only, omitting any reference to conservatism. This is true even of his foreign policies (consider those directed at famine, AIDS and human trafficking) – and of the war in Iraq.

Consider that last year, upon telling a Connecticut audience that the United States had liberated an innocent people oppressed by a barbaric regime, Mr. Bush said: "We're compassionate. We care deeply about our fellow citizens in this world." His unqualified embrace of compassion can leave a conservative listener wanting a dose of conservatism, since it would provide limits to what otherwise might become a limitless pursuit – whether overseas or here at home.

Consider that Mr. Bush has also said: "There is no question that we can rid [America] of hopelessness and despair." A compassionate liberal could equally say that while proposing new and costly government programs (another Great Society?) to achieve those ends.

Before the Republican convention this week, Mr. Bush is likely to talk about compassion once again. But if you're inclined to assess his conservatism, you'll listen closely for nuance, for reference to limiting principles, for discussion of "responsibility and results."

You'll listen, too, for amplification of a theme Mr. Bush already has sounded: that the election offers a choice between "two visions of government" – one that "encourages ownership and opportunity" and one that "takes your money and makes your choices." In other words, a choice between (paradoxically) the use of government to free individuals from dependence upon government – or its use to increase that dependence. If Mr. Bush pursues this theme, and if he is re-elected, he'll have the chance to redefine the meaning of conservative governance.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Terry Eastland is is publisher of The Weekly Standard.Comment by clicking here.

07/28/04: How many more 'adverse' court decisions will it take before the case for an amendment to protect traditional marriage becomes compelling?
07/15/04: Edwards wasn't chosen just for his hair
06/23/04: Special counsel law: Reform gone awry
06/14/04: Reagan's influence is apparent in federal judiciary
05/25/04: What do Bush's sagging approval ratings really mean for November?
05/17/04: We must make distinctions between Berg, Abu Ghraib
05/11/04: College costs rise with students' expectations
04/30/04: A country's declining birthrate into oblivion
04/26/04: Dems escalate the judicial war
04/09/04: Bush was right to permit Rice to testify on 9-11
03/25/04: Colleges doing away with their racially exclusive programs
03/02/04: What does a conservative beat mean for The New York Times?
12/31/03: America is right to press for religious freedom worldwide
10/22/03: Case involving pledge should be easy for justices to decide
10/15/03: Dean places political considerations ahead of national security
08/28/03: Colleges creating policies that discourage intellectual exchange
08/14/03: Progressive reform could end up limiting government
07/30/03: Congressman, please consult Miss Manners
07/23/03:Words reveal much about Bush: Maybe there is a reason he won't retract sentence
07/08/03: Justices also said affirmative action must end
06/25/03: Court's law school ruling isn't persuasive
06/24/03: Whatever the Lynch story, everyone wants it
06/18/03: A judge shows he can set aside his strong views
06/04/03: Boston church becomes politically important again
05/28/03: YWCA names culture warrior as its new head
05/23/03: Washington steps in to help teach history
05/13/03: It may take another election to change filibuster rules
05/07/03: Paige works to improve education from inside out
04/30/03: Iraqis have choice to make regarding religious freedom
04/16/03: Is it acceptable for an education secretary to state a personal preference for religious schooling?
04/08/03: University officials must put academics ahead of athletics
04/02/03: Support for our soldiers means support for their orders
03/27/03: 'Free Iraqi Forces' underscore Bush's sincerity
03/18/03: Dems misunderstand judge's job
03/13/03: Justices show right restraint in ruling on anti-crime measures
03/05/03: America's imperial intentions
02/25/03: The weakness of Dems' stated reason for their filibuster makes you wonder whether it is the real reason
02/19/03: Administration fine-tunes religious rights in public education
02/12/03: France and Germany need to be reminded of the necessity of a strong, even predominant America
02/06/03: Judiciary's 'balance' -- or lack of it -- is our doing
01/29/03: The child who almost wasn't
01/21/03: President decides to punt on affirmative action case
01/14/03: Bush's faith has influenced his conduct in public office
01/07/03: Dems need ideas, not more microphones
12/17/02: Gray Lady should learn that times have changed
12/10/02: Will High Court be guilty of activism?
12/03/02: The missing facts in news accounts of Saudi Princess Haifa's putative 'charity'
11/26/02: Americans don't have to be worried about Big Brother
11/19/02: Texas' reputation for flamboyance may be revised
11/11/02: Bush now can repair confirmation system
11/05/02: Dems shouldn't believe too strongly in history
10/30/02: Snipers had lots of motives
10/23/02: No one should be shut out of marketplace of ideas
10/15/02: Open hearings that could imperil the nation
10/08/02: Debating the clear and present danger
10/01/02: A great awakening in China?
09/25/02: Abortion, again? The settled but still unsettling law of Roe v. Wade
09/18/02: A relevant presidency--and irrelevant U.N?
09/10/02: Ashcroft's obtuse judicial statement
09/04/02: The Education Gadfly stings again
08/28/02: So then let the president declare war
08/21/02: Will Bush finally 'fix' affirmative action once and for all?
08/06/02: President must take up cause of Egyptian democracy warrior
07/31/02: With each war, civil liberties are curtailed less

© 2004, Terry Eastland