Jewish World Review April 26, 2004 /5 Iyar, 5764
Dems escalate the judicial war
Imagine it is the spring of 2006, John Kerry is president, and the Democrats hold the same number of Senate seats as the Republicans do today - 51. President Kerry has made dozens of nominations to the bench, but he is frustrated because the Republican minority has used the filibuster to block floor votes on a growing number of his nominees to the all-important circuit courts of appeal.
It takes 60 votes to break a filibuster, but those Republicans have stood firm. What is Mr. Kerry to do? Does he dare use his recess appointment power to place some of his nominees on the bench, even though they can stay there only until the end of the next session of Congress? He winds up doing precisely that, infuriating Senate Republicans.
All of that is impossible to imagine, you say. But it isn't - not unless you are certain that a Republican minority would fail to follow the precedent that has been set by the current Democratic minority.
What that minority has done is effect an unexpected escalation in the ongoing battle over judicial nominations. The Democrats - Sen. Kerry among them - have gone where no Senate minority ever has gone by routinely resorting to the filibuster to block floor votes on judicial nominees. They have succeeded in denying votes on six of President Bush's choices for the circuit courts.
Mr. Bush has responded by using his recess appointment power to place two of the filibustered six on the courts - Charles Pickering (to the 5th Circuit) and William Pryor (to the 11th). And the Democrats now have responded by declaring that unless Mr. Bush promises not to appoint judges while Congress is in recess, they will, as Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle has put it, refuse "to cooperate in the confirmation of federal judges." Implied here is a threat to filibuster every judge that the Senate majority moves for a vote.
This is where we are with judicial selection, and it isn't a place most observers (including me) thought we ever would be.
During the 100th Congress, the last two years of the Reagan presidency, the Democratic Senate approved 65.2 percent of the president's circuit court nominees, down from the 80 to 100 percent levels of the previous three Congresses, when Republicans ran the Senate.
During the 103rd Congress, when Democrats held the upper house, Bill Clinton saw 85.2 percent of his circuit court nominees confirmed.
But during the 104th, 105th and 106th Congresses, the Republican Senate approved 57.9 percent, 67.9 percent and then 40.6 percent of his circuit court nominees.
Most recently, during the 107th Congress, the Democratic majority, in a vengeful mood, confirmed 50.6 percent of Mr. Bush's circuit court choices.
In November 2002, when Republicans recaptured the Senate - thus producing unified government - it was reasonable to expect that the judges' wars would abate. But so far in the 108th Congress, while nominations have moved more quickly, Mr. Bush still has seen only 40.6 percent (13 of 32) of his circuit court nominees confirmed. The main reason is the Democrats' unprecedented resort to the filibuster.
Few people outside the Senate thought the Democrats really would use it. And maybe a lot of Senate Democrats, fearing negative political fallout, which so far has been nil, didn't think they would, either.
But the unfortunate effect of the Democrats' extraordinary use of the filibuster has been to change the rules governing judicial confirmation. For where a simple majority once sufficed, 60 votes now may be needed if a president wants to see his circuit court choices confirmed.
Given the evenly divided electorate, it is hard to imagine a president working with a filibuster-proof majority - probably one made up entirely of same-party members - anytime soon. Which means that determined Senate minorities - whether Republican or Democratic - can hold the balance of power on judicial nominations.
A question for Mr. Kerry is whether it was prudent for Senate Democrats to have ratcheted up the judges' war by employing the filibuster. It often is said that in the Senate, "what goes around comes around." What is going around today could well come around, should Mr. Kerry find himself vested with the power he seeks.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Terry Eastland is is publisher of The Weekly Standard.Comment by clicking here.
04/09/04: Bush was right to permit Rice to testify on 9-11
03/25/04: Colleges doing away with their racially exclusive programs
03/02/04: What does a conservative beat mean for The New York Times?
12/31/03: America is right to press for religious freedom worldwide
10/22/03: Case involving pledge should be easy for justices to decide
10/15/03: Dean places political considerations ahead of national security
08/28/03: Colleges creating policies that discourage intellectual exchange
08/14/03: Progressive reform could end up limiting government
07/30/03: Congressman, please consult Miss Manners
07/23/03:Words reveal much about Bush: Maybe there is a reason he won't retract sentence
07/08/03: Justices also said affirmative action must end
06/25/03: Court's law school ruling isn't persuasive
06/24/03: Whatever the Lynch story, everyone wants it
06/18/03: A judge shows he can set aside his strong views
06/04/03: Boston church becomes politically important again
05/28/03: YWCA names culture warrior as its new head
05/23/03: Washington steps in to help teach history
05/13/03: It may take another election to change filibuster rules
05/07/03: Paige works to improve education from inside out
04/30/03: Iraqis have choice to make regarding religious freedom
04/16/03: Is it acceptable for an education secretary to state a personal preference for religious schooling?
04/08/03: University officials must put academics ahead of athletics
04/02/03: Support for our soldiers means support for their orders
03/27/03: 'Free Iraqi Forces' underscore Bush's sincerity
03/18/03: Dems misunderstand judge's job
03/13/03: Justices show right restraint in ruling on anti-crime measures
03/05/03: America's imperial intentions
02/25/03: The weakness of Dems' stated reason for their filibuster makes you wonder whether it is the real reason
02/19/03: Administration fine-tunes religious rights in public education
02/12/03: France and Germany need to be reminded of the necessity of a strong, even predominant America
02/06/03: Judiciary's 'balance' -- or lack of it -- is our doing
01/29/03: The child who almost wasn't
01/21/03: President decides to punt on affirmative action case
01/14/03: Bush's faith has influenced his conduct in public office
01/07/03: Dems need ideas, not more microphones
12/17/02: Gray Lady should learn that times have changed
12/10/02: Will High Court be guilty of activism?
12/03/02: The missing facts in news accounts of Saudi Princess Haifa's putative 'charity'
11/26/02: Americans don't have to be worried about Big Brother
11/19/02: Texas' reputation for flamboyance may be revised
11/11/02: Bush now can repair confirmation system
11/05/02: Dems shouldn't believe too strongly in history
10/30/02: Snipers had lots of motives
10/23/02: No one should be shut out of marketplace of ideas
10/15/02: Open hearings that could imperil the nation
10/08/02: Debating the clear and present danger
10/01/02: A great awakening in China?
09/25/02: Abortion, again? The settled but still unsettling law of Roe v. Wade
09/18/02: A relevant presidency--and irrelevant U.N?
09/10/02: Ashcroft's obtuse judicial statement
09/04/02: The Education Gadfly stings again
08/28/02: So then let the president declare war
08/21/02: Will Bush finally 'fix' affirmative action once and for all?
08/06/02: President must take up cause of Egyptian democracy warrior
07/31/02: With each war, civil liberties are curtailed less
© 2004, Terry Eastland