The administrative state and the Bill of Rights

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

The administrative state continues to run amok under President Joe Biden.

Recently, a judge with the National Labor Relations Board found that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy violated federal labor law. His crime? Offering his opinion about the consequences of employees forming a union.

Jassy in April 2022 had the gall to tell a CNBC host that Amazon employees would be "better off" without a union because it would be harder to "get things done" and they would be less "empowered." Two months later at a conference where he was interviewed by a Bloomberg TV anchor, Jassy made similar comments, as he did in November of that year to a New York Times forum.

This resulted in a complaint from union interests, who essentially argued that there is a First Amendment exception for speech made regarding union organizing efforts.

That notion is absurd, of course. Any regulations in the National Labor Relations Act governing union organization campaigns must be interpreted through the lens of the Bill of Rights.

Incredibly, however, Judge Brian D. Gee sided with Big Labor, ruling that Jassy had engaged in "coercive predictions about the effects of unionization" and made "threatening" comments that were not protected by the First Amendment. He then ordered Jassy to "cease and desist" from similar statements and mandated that the company post notices at various facilities that included the sentence: "WE WILL NOT threaten you by saying that you would be less empowered if you unionized, that you would find it harder to get things done quickly since unions are slower and more bureaucratic, and that you would be better off without a union."

Not only did Judge Gee trample upon Jassy's free-speech rights, a good case can be made that he went over the line again by compelling Amazon to support a viewpoint directly at odds with its leader's original assertions.

It's worth noting that Judge Gee is an administrative law judge for the NLRB. Before his appointment two years ago, he spent 26 years as an attorney for the board. This is the cozy arrangement that characterizes the administrative state on steroids. In-house judges who have a loyalty to the agency they represent and who are employed by the same bureaucracy that prosecutes the alleged violations they hear.

Yes, workers have a right to unionize. But neither labor interests nor management gives up its First Amendment rights during an organization effort.

"If Judge Gee's decision is left to stand … employers would rightly wonder whether they can speak about unionization at all, despite their legally protected right to do so," said a statement from the National Retail Federation.

Jassy should appeal immediately.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Previously:
• Report again highlights need for entitlement reform
• Wage law is good news for . .. the robots
• Joe Biden should commit to presidential debates
• Biden tax plan would pummel average Americans
• Iran's brazen attack on Israel was 'utterly unsuccessful'
• More free stuff
• Biden proposes another massive spending spree
• Dems increasingly desperate over No Labels
• Biden hams it up during stemwinder
• Economies roar in red states
• To establish 'absolute tyranny over these States'
• Biden condemns himself in attack on shrinkflation
• If only Taylor Swift were dating the national debt
• Biden bows to Putin, environmentalists
• Defenders of 'democracy' want Voter ID off ballot
• 'No one is safe if they had any hand in' Oct. 7
• Biden infrastructure bill: A failure to launch
• US government revenues hit record highs
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Why Biden can't convince voters he's beat inflation
• Biden needs to stop the mixed messages
• The hating class as brave defenders
• Blinken only emboldens Hamas terrorists
• White House green Slush fund throwing around cash
• Biden immigration policies souring even Dems
• Dems fret as the bad news mounts for Biden
• Billions in coronavirus money still sitting around
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Senate delegation reassures Israel; where's the House?
• Chicago takes victim blaming to an absurd new low
• The utter failure of money to improve education
• Group identity drives American division
• The downside of Biden's drug price control scheme
• WARNING: Here's why top insurers are fleeing
• 'They even laughed in my face'
• Red states power Biden's economy
• 'If you have private insurance, you can' … OOPS!
• Ignoring the Bill of Rights when its convenient
• Hunter cops a plea --- but the Biden probes continue
• Will we every truly know the depth of pandemic fraud?
• Hello there, Big Brother! Please, come right in
• Its not perfect, but it's a start on immigration reform
• IRS wants to branch out
• Gas stove ban conspiracy theory comes true
• Biden's busy bureaucrats beef up regulatory state
• Don't even dare think of emulamating New Yawk!
• Where have all the nation's college students gone?
• Soft-on-crime policies hit hard wall of political reality
• Joe Biden and Monty Python is no comedy
• Global warming was supposed to wreak havoc on polar bears. Looks like someone forgot to tell the polar bears