Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 27, 2002 / 21 Tishrei, 5763

Michael Long

Mike Long
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Goodbye To All That

The terrible, wide war that must be fought.


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | The days of American moral neutrality are over. Thank G-d-and G-d preserve us in the coming storm.

The President has announced a wholesale shift in U.S. security policy from deterrence to prevention. We are thus set on a path where, by definition, we must abandon our idealistic stance of "all nations equal" in favor of fighting for a few proven and suddenly-threatened virtues that make civilization possible: freedom of religion, speech, association, government.

We have prided ourselves in the second half of the twentieth century on being the colossus of tolerance by reason, standing astride the globe shouting not "Stop!" (as William F. Buckley put it years ago), but "Live and let live!" This ideal of liberty is at the heart of the best thinking on the left and the right; the fundamental difference between the two sides having always been from which end to carve out exceptions of laissez-fair morality, and how deep.

Moreover, this "ideal of the unbiased" is the only acceptable starting point for investigation of anything at all: assume nothing, consider everything. But the principle fails to serve if those who apply it refuse to accept all the conclusions to which evidence leads. For many, those orphaned conclusions automatically include anything reflecting conventional wisdom or tradition-that is, conclusions that some things are always bad, and cannot be tolerated.

In a world where tolerance is the ideal, this makes for an apparent contradiction that many cannot accept. They end up deciding that a tolerant worldview must allow even for intolerance whose principles threaten the tolerant system itself.

So we are now divided into two groups. The first asserts that some things are not only evil, with all the half-packed philosophical baggage the word carries, but also unjustifiable: No one has a justifiable reason to fly passenger jets into buildings. Some leaders and societies are too unstable to be allowed weapons of mass destruction. A proportionate response to the threat of terrorist attacks is unquestionable neutralization of the enemy, most often by military means.

The second asserts that everything is ultimately amenable to reason-that is, it can be accommodated within a framework of tolerance-and that those rare entities that are not amenable may be constrained or deterred by other engines of reason: Hyper-aggression, even an act as sickening as the World Trade Center attack, is usually a desperate lashing out on behalf of oppressed groups who see no other outlet. If one nation is entitled to acquire weapons of mass destruction, all nations are similarly entitled. A proportionate response to the threat of terrorist attacks should consist not of punishment but of attention to root causes, which shall be both a preventative and deterrence by remedying oppression.

So we argue whether U.S. hegemony is the cause of our problems, or the solution. Whether an essentially absolute American military power can be a force for peace, or if it inevitably becomes a vehicle for cultural and economic paternalism. Whether lawless dictators should be contained or cut down.

Interesting questions, all. But the debate over them in the current state of the world leads to certain answers that either encourage or discourage the survival of the U.S. and, with it, the ideal behind the U.S. itself. Are some systems of government, some nations, and some ideologies so oppressive and threatening that they must be destroyed? The weight of evidence leads to a suicidal contradiction for those who believe "Live and let live" has no limits.

The goal of Islamic fundamentalism is to establish Islamic theocracies-where Allah must be worshipped-around the globe. Is this acceptable? No. The goal of Islamic fundamentalism is to destabilize America to make the first goal easier to reach. Is this acceptable? No. The goal of Islamic fundamentalism is to bring low the concept of individual and group liberties because at best it offends their concept of G-d and at worst it separates various megalomaniacs from acquiring more oppressive power. Is this acceptable? No.

Ideologies which, a priori, disallow freedom of religion, speech, association, and representative government are bad enough, but we don't fight against all of them with tanks and soldiers because, ultimately, they all don't pose an immediate threat to our own tolerance-based system, however imperfect our attempts may have been to build such a thing.

Today, however, there is such an immediate threat. When groups attempt to impose those same ideologies around the world by physically attacking us and attempting to keep us constantly off-balance, they must be fought against, and decried as threats to civilization. It is not acceptable to merely keep them at bay. They must be destroyed before they bring down the house.

These are the fundamental truths lately ignored, mostly as a result of well-intentioned but fetishistic imagining that all values and all forms of government are equally virtuous. Yet one simple truth is indisputable by either left or right: some ideologies stand foursquare against everything that is good: freedom, liberty, equality. Members of a dark empire are gathering to destroy those things, including the freedom to come to this or any conclusion. They are coming for you and me personally. It is time to fight them, and to their death.

Like this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Michael Long is a a director of the White House Writers Group. Comment by clicking here.

Up

09/20/02: The Florida Lesson: We need better voters, not better machines
09/13/02: A few thoughts on the news
09/06/02: Give Them What They Want
08/13/02: The Dangerous Lull on Iraq ... And how today's delay proves why 9/11 had to happen
07/26/02: Where's Honest Debate on Judge Owen?: NOW members should demand better of President Kim Gandy
07/19/02: A Secret No One Can Keep: Why Osama bin Laden is still alive
07/09/02: Don't forget why Bush was elected
06/28/02: The bravest pop culture icon in the war on terror
06/14/02: Five Thoughts On Father's Day: Personal Stuff
06/06/02: Stay Awake, Grads, I'm Almost Done Talking: Life, and How to Live It
05/31/02: See This Movie: "The Sum of All Fears" is a wake-up call
05/24/02: Richard Simmons for President? What really motivates the fat-taxers
05/13/02: The Carnival at the FAIR: "Unbiased" acquires a new definition
04/22/02: Bottled And Sold: Economic Confidence Under a Screw-top
04/12/02: McGovern's Respectful Dissent
04/02/02: The Right to Do Wrong: The Creator, A Clockwork Orange, and war
03/26/02: The Big Story No One Talks About: Why isn't Washington serious about airport security?
03/18/02: Worlds Away: A snapshot of anti-Semitism in the Moslem world
03/08/02: The safest place in the world --- for now
03/05/02: Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others
02/22/02: And Then What?: Fear and Loathing Around the Corner
02/15/02: Al Gore and the real root cause of terrorism
02/08/02: A few thoughts on the news
02/01/02: Ready, Aim, Cloud The Issue: An irresponsible report on "terrorism" from the Brady Center
01/28/02: Discretion and Art, Part 2
01/16/02: Discretion and Art
01/08/02: Desperate Dems
12/18/01: Politics and Holidays
12/07/01: A war bigger than we know: Changing the future, slowly and surely
11/28/01: A Mid-Winter Night's Dream: A play in one fun act
11/20/01: A Lot of War Left To Fight
11/13/01: Guess who Clinton's apologizing for now: I'll bet you guessed right
11/02/01: Rules for Wartime: Rule Number One: Remember what's true
10/26/01: The Moral Case For Torture: Dirty hands don't always mean dirty souls
10/19/01: Questions for the Anti-War Crowd, Part II: What if someone took them seriously?
10/16/01: Questions for the anti-war crowd: If they question you, ask these back
10/12/01: The Jason Problem: Sometimes they only look dead
10/08/01: A little hindsight: A letter for readers in the future
09/28/01: Calling Bono: A plea to the pop culture elite to speak out
09/20/01: Encouragement from the Heartland, by mail
09/13/01: Bleeding time
09/07/01: The trailer-park taste of the public radio catalog
09/04/01: BRAVE NEW FREUD: Internet-based psychiatry may mean relief for those who have shunned treatment
08/17/01: First Amendment: Chickens home to roost
08/10/01: PRESS RELEASE: UNREPENTANT SHARK MURDERER LOUNGES IN HOSPITAL
07/27/01: Dispatch From The Front: The Gun Control War
07/20/01: Summer song
07/03/01: It's a Wonderful Recount


© 2001, Michael Long