Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 12, 2002 / Rosh Chodesh Iyar, 5762

Michael Long

Mike Long
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

McGovern's Respectful Dissent | As time passes, George McGovern looks better and better. Not for his policies, but as a responsible citizen who doesn't confuse value with virtue, and as someone who respects the intentions of demonstrably good men.

In an essay this week in The Nation magazine-the premier policy forum for American leftists-Senator McGovern demonstrates that while a sense of responsibility has diminished among Democrats since his own day, certain naïveté remains timeless.

McGovern begins by acknowledging what today's armchair generals forgot long ago: "No longer in government, I do not have the benefit of national security briefings or Congressional committee deliberations. So… it may be more appropriate for me to ask some questions that have been on my mind both before and since September 11."

Fair enough. It's wise to ask probing questions about the conduct of a war, and as a World War II bomber pilot and a leader in the anti-war movement in the 1960s, McGovern certainly has the experience and authority.

Unlike the "Hey kids, let's protest!" part of the current anti-war crowd, McGovern asks thoughtful questions that add up to an explication of an alternate course for war. His reasonable questions deserve reasonable answers.

McGovern asks, "Which course might produce better results in advancing American security? Is it by continuing to boycott… Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Libya and Cuba… ? Or would we be better off opening up … trade… ?"

The senator is onto something that many thoughtful Republicans and Democrats agree with: trade builds peace. It is unwise to begin trade with outlaw states without careful explanations as to why we would do so-and unthinkable when effectively at war with them. But the argument about the value of trade in spreading democracy and human rights was made well in 2000, with the passage of Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China.

We also support boycotts against Iraq and others for fear that our interaction with such regimes will be taken as a seal of approval for their government's conduct-a reflection of the problem that most American's conception of government is nanny instead of referee.

But with that, the senator runs out of good ideas. McGovern asks, "Isn't [a rogue nation] simply one [that] doesn't always behave the way we think it should?" Well, no. Rogue nations (or as Madeline Albright likes to put it, "states of concern"-see where such thinking leads?) are those that support or sponsor terror. This is a bright line, and when portrayed as only a conflict of values, the absolute standards of good and bad-of human rights themselves-suffer violence themselves.

McGovern asks, "Instead of adding $48 billion to the Pentagon budget, as the President has proposed, wouldn't we make the world a more stable, secure place if we invested half of that sum in reducing poverty, ignorance, hunger and disease in the world?" Alas, a Democrat's disdain for and discounting of defense is hidden in a false either/or choice. Besides, bullies don't answer to kindness, they answer only to force. Charity is admirable, but it will not stop a single terror strike tomorrow.

Osama bin Laden is a wealthy man. He doesn't promise his followers prosperity; he explicitly promises them war and death. Radical Islam is fighting for neither possessions nor comfort. Its adherents fight for power, leverage, and the restoration of what they viscerally perceive as lost honor-while more than a few seem simply to revel in killing innocents.

McGovern notes the government-in-waiting, sequestered outside Washington, and asks if "paranoia has become policy." Of course, it has not. We are prepared this way because, unlike in previous conflicts, we face an enemy who seeks biological or nuclear weapons that could conceivably be smuggled in a suitcase-or created here, under the ironic cover of an "open society." This enemy has already demonstrated its will-indeed, absolute glee-to use weapons of mass destruction. McGovern terribly underestimates the threat.

McGovern concludes by suggesting that the "grim rhetoric" of President Bush is replacing Communism with terrorism as "the second great hobgoblin of our age," but the answer to that misguided idea is, sadly, self-evident.

Still, one has to respect the presentation of his ideas. He does not trash the sincerity or the intentions of our leaders; and he acknowledges that they have access to more information than he does. This is just the sort of reasonable engagement that should always be welcome in the public square-a far cry from the beat-down-Bush politics of the Left just now. George McGovern's respectful example is welcome anytime, but he can leave his policies on the doorstep.

JWR contributor Michael Long is a a director of the White House Writers Group. Comment by clicking here.


04/02/02: The Right to Do Wrong: The Creator, A Clockwork Orange, and war
03/26/02: The Big Story No One Talks About: Why isn't Washington serious about airport security?
03/18/02: Worlds Away: A snapshot of anti-Semitism in the Moslem world
03/08/02: The safest place in the world --- for now
03/05/02: Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others
02/22/02: And Then What?: Fear and Loathing Around the Corner
02/15/02: Al Gore and the real root cause of terrorism
02/08/02: A few thoughts on the news
02/01/02: Ready, Aim, Cloud The Issue: An irresponsible report on "terrorism" from the Brady Center
01/28/02: Discretion and Art, Part 2
01/16/02: Discretion and Art
01/08/02: Desperate Dems
12/18/01: Politics and Holidays
12/07/01: A war bigger than we know: Changing the future, slowly and surely
11/28/01: A Mid-Winter Night's Dream: A play in one fun act
11/20/01: A Lot of War Left To Fight
11/13/01: Guess who Clinton's apologizing for now: I'll bet you guessed right
11/02/01: Rules for Wartime: Rule Number One: Remember what's true
10/26/01: The Moral Case For Torture: Dirty hands don't always mean dirty souls
10/19/01: Questions for the Anti-War Crowd, Part II: What if someone took them seriously?
10/16/01: Questions for the anti-war crowd: If they question you, ask these back
10/12/01: The Jason Problem: Sometimes they only look dead
10/08/01: A little hindsight: A letter for readers in the future
09/28/01: Calling Bono: A plea to the pop culture elite to speak out
09/20/01: Encouragement from the Heartland, by mail
09/13/01: Bleeding time
09/07/01: The trailer-park taste of the public radio catalog
09/04/01: BRAVE NEW FREUD: Internet-based psychiatry may mean relief for those who have shunned treatment
08/17/01: First Amendment: Chickens home to roost
07/27/01: Dispatch From The Front: The Gun Control War
07/20/01: Summer song
07/03/01: It's a Wonderful Recount

© 2001, Michael Long