' Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 22, 2002 / 16 Mar-Cheshvan, 5763

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Gaffney
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Too clever by half?


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Up in Maine, where President Bush and his family have long vacationed, they tell a story about the crusty "Down Easterner" who tries to help a lost tourist get to his destination. After suggesting several routes then concluding they won't work, the local gives up, saying "You can't rightly get there from here."

The same can be said about three initiatives currently being undertaken in Mr. Bush's name by Secretary of State Colin Powell that are supposed to denuclearize North Korea, disarm Iraq and create a peaceable state for the Palestinian Arabs. The ineluctable reality is that negotiations aimed at such goals with the likes of Kim Jong-Il, Saddam Hussein's patrons in the UN Security Council and Yasser Arafat's surrogates are doomed to produce results incompatible with vital U.S. interests.

The question is: Do the current diplomatic efforts represent clever stratagems by Mr. Bush, aimed at deflecting opposition to and otherwise advancing his, more realistic foreign policy agenda? Or has he actually been induced to believe that he can get where this country needs to go vis vis the North Korean, Iraqi and Palestinian regimes through various "processes" ostensibly managed by Powell's State Department?

North Korea: Last week, the Bush Administration revealed that Kim Jong-Il's government had admitted it was pursuing a second nuclear weapons program in violation of several international commitments -- notably, an "Agreed Framework" which handsomely rewarded Pyongyang for remaining non-nuclear. North Korean officials proceeded to declare the Agreed Framework null and void. For his part, Mr. Powell on Sunday described the agreement as "effectively dead" and hundreds of millions of dollars worth of fuel oil and nuclear power reactors promised the North pursuant to that deal apparently will not be forthcoming.

At the same time, Mr. Powell and his subordinates have made clear that the Administra tion is committed to seeking a "diplomatic solution" to this crisis, presumably hoping that new negotiations will succeed where others have failed. Is this just razzle-dazzle maneuvering, calculated to avoid a crisis on the Korean peninsula as the Bush team prepares for war with Iraq, giving it a chance to stiffen the spines of its South Korean and Japanese allies (who have been keen to normalize relations with Kim Jong-Il) and, thereby, preserving and shoring up containment of the North until such time as it can be rolled-back? Or will this "dialogue" once again translate into more Western concessions that amount to political, financial and technological life-support for a regime that Mr. Bush has properly tagged as a member of the "Axis of Evil"?

Iraq: For weeks, Secretary Powell has been negotiating with other Security Council members, seeking a resolution authorizing the return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq. Here again, is the Administration merely going through the motions -- getting past the November elections, putting the forces needed to liberate Iraq into place in the region and checking the box mandated by Congress of exhausting diplomatic options before going to war? Or, as seems increasingly likely, is the President going to be stuck inextricably to the tar baby of renewed UN inspections, inspections that will surely prove incompatible with the goal of disarming Iraq, since the only prospect for accomplishing that end is to remove Saddam and his ruling clique from power?

It is an ominous indicator that Secretary Powell has now repeatedly asserted, without correction, that "All we are interested in is getting rid of those [Iraqi] weapons of mass destruction." By dumbing-down the President's clearly stated war aims, Mr. Powell may make it easier to get a watered-down mandate from the UN. But no one should be under any illusion that that road will get Mr. Bush to regime change in Iraq. This advice is at least every bit as flawed as that given in 1990 by then-General Powell to the previous President Bush to the effect that economic sanctions would compel Saddam Hussein to quit Kuwait.

Palestinian Statehood: A recent study by the estimable Zionist Organization of America has documented that Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority has not made tangible progress on any of the specific milestones President Bush declared would be preconditions for U.S. recognition of a state of "Palestine." Yet, the Bush Administration has begun a new round of regional diplomacy aimed at establishing such an entity in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Secretary Powell has even declared that a Palestinian state would be recognized in 2003 -- undercutting the President's position that real reforms must happen first, to say nothing of a complete end to Arab violence against Israel.

It is hard to believe that Mr. Bush really wants to create a new terrorist-sponsoring state, even as he works to take down existing ones. Is the diplomacy now underway going to be allowed, inexorably, to produce such a dismal result -- or does the President think he can keep this "process" from coming a cropper like so many before it, yet get credit from so- called Arab allies for not neglecting the plight of Palestinians?

Mr. Bush has shown himself to be a serious practitioner of the art of statecraft. The future of his presidency and the outcome of the war on terror may hinge, however, on whether he is now engaging in necessary and controllable stratagems or simply succumbing to the machinations of subordinates who may or may not share his goals, but whose gambits will surely foreclose their realization.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. heads the Center for Security Policy. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up

10/17/02: 'Drain the swamps'
10/08/02: The temptations of George Bush
10/01/02: Return of the San Francisco Dems
09/24/02: The next crusader?
09/17/02: It is no accident that advocates of coercive inspections have opposed prez's goal of regime change
09/10/02: A model for Iraq
08/27/02: Beware 'consensus leadership'
08/20/02: To Iraq or not to Iraq?
08/13/02: Trading with the 'enemy'
07/30/02: Who's trashing Ashcroft?
07/23/02: Wall Street's 'poisoned apples'
07/16/02: Back on the China front
07/09/02: See no evil?
07/02/02: Rethinking peacekeeping
06/25/02: Political moment of truth on defense
06/19/02: Inviting losses on two fronts
06/12/02: Make missile defense happen
06/04/02: The next 'Day of Infamy'?
05/29/02: Bush's Russian gamble
05/21/02: The 'next war'
05/15/02: Ex-presidential misconduct
05/07/02: When 'what if' is no game
05/02/02: Careful what we wish for
04/24/02: The real 'root cause' of terror
04/02/02: First principles in the Mideast
03/26/02: 'Renounce this map'
03/20/02: The inconvenient ally
03/12/02: Adults address the 'unthinkable'
03/05/02: The Saudi scam
02/26/02: Rumsfeld's 'now hear this'
02/19/02: Where's the outrage?
02/12/02: Post-mortem on 'Pearl Harbor II'
02/05/02: Spinning on the 'Evil Axis'
01/29/02: A challenge for the history books
01/22/02: Who pulled the plug on the Chinese 'bugs'?
01/15/02: No 'need to know'
01/08/02: Sentenced to de-nuclearize?
12/18/01: Missile defense mismanagement?
12/11/01: Is the Cold War 'over'?
12/04/01: A moment for truth
11/29/01: Send in the marines -- with the planes they need
11/27/01: 'Now Hear This': Does the President Mean What He Says?
11/20/01: Mideast 'vision thing'
11/13/01: The leitmotif of the next three days
11/06/01: Bush's Reykjavik Moment
10/30/01: Say it ain't true, 'W.
10/23/01: Getting history, and the future, right
10/16/01: Farewell to arms control
10/05/01: A time to choose
09/25/01: Don't drink the 'lemonade'
09/11/01: Sudan envoy an exercise in futility?
09/05/01: Strategy of a thousand cuts
08/28/01: Rummy's back
08/21/01: Prepare for 'two wars'
08/14/01: Why does the Bush Administration make a moral equivalence between terrorist attacks and Israel's restrained defensive responses?
08/07/01: A New bipartisanship in security policy?
07/31/01: Don't go there
07/17/01: The 'end of the beginning'
07/10/01: Testing President Bush
07/03/01: Market transparency works
06/27/01: Which Bush will it be on missile defense?
06/19/01: Don't politicize military matters
06/05/01: It's called leadership
06/05/01: With friends like these ...
05/31/01: Which way on missile defense?
05/23/01: Pearl Harbor, all over again
05/15/01: A tale of two Horatios
05/08/01: The real debate about missile defense
04/24/01: Sell aegis ships to Taiwan
04/17/01: The 'hi-tech for China' bill
04/10/01: Deal on China's hostages -- then what?
04/03/01: Defense fire sale redux
03/28/01: The defense we need
03/21/01: Critical mass
03/13/01: The Bush doctrine
03/08/01: Self-Deterred from Defending America
02/27/01: Truth and consequences for Saddam
02/21/01: Defense fire sale
02/13/01: Dubya's Marshall Plan
02/05/01: Doing the right thing on an 'Arab-Arab dispute'
01/30/01: The missile defense decision
01/23/01: The Osprey as Phoenix
01/17/01: Clinton's Parting Shot at Religious Freedom
01/09/01: Wake-up call on space
01/02/01: Secretary Rumsfeld
12/27/00: Redefining our Ukraine policy
12/19/00: Deploy missile defense now
12/12/00: Sabotaging space power
12/05/00: Preempting Bush
11/28/00: What Clinton hath wrought
11/21/00: HE'S BAAAACK
11/14/00: The world won't wait

© 2001, Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.