Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review August 6, 2002 / 28 Menachem-Av, 5762

Doug Bandow

Doug Bandow
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Hostile allies | PESHAWAR, Pakistan Washington has tied itself, albeit reluctantly, to Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf. But with Musharraf's popularity falling and hostility to America rising, the United States must remember that the friendship is tenuous at best. The stares greeting Westerners are sometimes cold even at the capital airport. They turn icy in more distant locations. A burqa-clad resident of Peshawar, which lies near the Afghan border, scolded her male relatives for allowing me and two other Westerners to approach their homes.

"They are not Muslims, they are bad people," she said.

Pakistan styles itself an "Islamic Republic." The elite pays only lip service to Muslim values, but Osama bin Laden represents the hard face of Islam.

Women in burqas cross busy streets. Men wear traditional baggy pants and long shirts; many sport beards and hats. There are Christians, too, but Pakistan's beleaguered Christian community accounts for barely 2 percent of the population. Religious persecution has worsened since Sept. 11.

"They blame us because Christians are linked to America," explains Emanuel S. Khokha, the 41-year-old pastor of a small Methodist congregation in Lahore.

"Discrimination is everywhere," the resident of one poor neighborhood told me. Christian children are often ostracized in public school. "They don't want to be friends with Christians," one 12-year-old told me.

A young bank employee was fired by her Muslim supervisor, who disliked her faith. Jobs and opportunities are offered to Muslims first. Muslims restrict charity to Muslims. Aid must come either from within the impoverished Christian community itself or outside groups, such as Christian Freedom International.

More serious is pervasive government discrimination. "If a Christian wants a service in a government office, he can't get it," complains Khokha.

The very poverty of the Pakistani state encourages discrimination. "Our government is also poor, so it doesn't supply Christian people," said one impoverished Christian.

One small Christian community in Lahore sits astride electrical transmission lines. Nearby lie well-served Muslim neighborhoods.

"We have applied for electricity many times," one resident told me.

But the government told the 70 families that connecting would cost $7,000, an impossible sum.

Some Christian children find themselves barred from school by local officials.

"We can't get in," one squatter on government land told me, though they provide for the Muslims.

Even in school, Christian children must learn and pass the subject Islamia, which teaches the tenets of Islam.

"You can't graduate without it," explains Shagufta Irene Samuel, general manager of the Technical Services Association, a Christian rehabilitation group.

Pakistan's poor enjoy little security of land tenure; most at risk are Christians. One community of about 50 families in Lahore has spent 35 years in makeshift homes on army land; some inherited their dwellings from their parents.

Yet the government refuses to release the land and destroyed a small church they built. The Muslim neighborhood next door is also on army property, but its members were allowed to lease their land and construct a mosque.

Moreover, access to government employment, sadly the best option in a grossly overpoliticized economy, is also limited.

"We apply for the jobs," even menial ones, and "we can't get them," one poor resident told me.

The government similarly skews foreign aid, directing benefits toward Muslims. With few countervailing private opportunities in a state-dominated economy, most Christians are locked into poverty.

Although Christians are largely left alone in their own areas, not so where the faiths mix.

"Muslims call if we have a meeting, and we get persecuted," complains Khokha.

Even worse is criminal prosecution. For instance, Pervez Masih, a Christian teacher, was imprisoned last year after answering a student's questions about Mohammed's less-than-perfect life.

"A lot of blasphemy cases are brought against Christians," complains TSA's Samuel. Converts in Islamic Pakistan face death. For this reason, Yousaf Masih, a member of Khokha's congregation, and his family recently received political asylum in America.

Nor is violence limited to apostates. Last October, gunmen stormed a church in Bahawalpur and slaughtered 15 Christians. More recently, murderous militants invaded a church attended by Westerners in Islamabad.

Religious persecution hinders the development of a more secular political culture that would provide a stronger barrier to Islamic fundamentalism. Similar intolerance is evident in Pakistan's international relations.

After Wimbledon, the Pakistan Tennis Federation ordered Pakistani player Aisamul Haq Qureshi to stop playing with doubles partner Amir Hadad, an Israeli.

"It is not just about tennis," explained Khawaja Saeed Hai, federation senior vice president.

Of course, the Musharraf government is better than a fundamentalist alternative. But only barely so. Indeed, Musharraf is losing support from educated and liberal elites for blatantly rigging the upcoming election. In doing so, he is also dragging down America's reputation.

For helping to contain the murderous impulses of a Medieval theology hostile to human life and dignity, Musharraf deserves U.S. support.

Washington, nevertheless, should distance itself from a regime whose legitimacy is eroding daily.

JWR contributor Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. Comment by clicking here.


07/30/02: Protecting or persecuting citizens?
07/23/02: Shifting the risk to Uncle Sam
07/16/02: Fighting the patent wars
07/09/02: Getting that quota feeling
07/02/02: Teetering on the Democratic edge
06/25/02: Judicial litmus tests
06/18/02: Killer teeth?
06/11/02: Europeans defending whom?
05/24/02: Threatening pharmaceutical innovation
05/14/02: The war crimes fantasy
05/07/02: Paying a high price for befriending Saudi princes
04/30/02: The price of postal monopoly
04/23/02: The war on charity
04/16/02: The forgotten human right
03/27/02: Cuba's struggle to be free
03/20/02: How to defeat Cuban communism
03/12/02: Junk science, redux
03/06/02: Axis of hubris
02/27/02: Washington-style campaign reform: incumbent protection
02/20/02: The grand Enron morality play
02/12/02: Rebuilding what?
02/05/02: Succumbing to the terrorist temptation
01/29/02: Democrats for what?
01/22/02: The Iraqi question
01/14/02: Profiling frequent flyers
01/08/02: Trade, not aid
01/02/02: Treason by any other name
12/26/01: Preserving freedom in an unfree world
12/17/01: Dealing with terrorism's aftermath
12/10/01: Emerging friendships?
12/04/01: Uncle Sam: Insurer of last resort
11/28/01: Expanding the circle of trade
11/20/01: Free to be stupid
11/13/01: The meaning of compassion
11/07/01: Patriotic scoundrels
10/30/01: The coming postal raid
10/16/01: First, do no harm
10/12/01: Good news from a suffering land
10/04/01: Defending whom?
09/25/01: The wrong solution to the wrong problem
09/21/01: The price of terrorism
08/28/01: Uncle Sam's retirement scam
08/21/01: Canberra's quaint naivete
08/14/01: Uncle Sam's false fuel economy
08/08/01: The Clinton administration in drag
07/31/01: The high cost of government
07/24/01: Kill the campaign reform illusion
07/17/01: Do as I say, not as I do
07/11/01: Lawyers at play
07/05/01: Western blundering, Macedonian disaster
06/26/01: How best to honor Bill Clinton?
06/19/01: A maturing Europe?
06/15/01: Tell Beijing to mind its own business
06/06/01: Ukraine's boiling cauldron
05/31/01: Protecting privacy from Uncle Sam
05/22/01: America's Balkan quagmire
05/09/01: The Taiwanese flash point
05/01/01: Globalization serves the world's poor
04/24/01: Who's cheating whom?
04/10/01: The NCAA scam
04/03/01: Balkan stupidities
03/27/01: McCain doesn't want a 'risk for our country'
03/20/01: Dubious Korean alliances
03/06/01: Coercive patriotism
02/27/01: Bombing without end
02/20/01: A dose of misplaced outrage
02/13/01: Psst: Tax cuts for taxpayers. Pass-it-on
02/06/01: Bridging the unbridgeable gap
01/23/01: Left-wing demagoguery
01/16/01: The drug war problem
01/10/01: Politics and trade
01/03/01: Hope for liberty?
12/27/00: The debris of war
12/19/00: What's the rule of law for?
12/15/00: Ending silicone breast implant saga
12/05/00: Election may yield victor, but there are no winners
11/21/00: A Bush presidential mandate?
11/07/00: Exprienced Gore? Yeah, right
11/01/00: Interventionist follies
10/17/00: America's brightening prospects in Ukraine
10/11/00: GOP budget scandals
10/03/00: How a pharmaceutical 'crisis' was created
09/27/00: Clinton's empathy has helped nobody
09/13/00: AlGore's risky budget policies
09/05/00: Military readiness and Korean commitments
08/29/00: Let sleeping hypocrites lie
08/21/00: Targeting a journalistic pariah
08/15/00: European garrison for Kosovo?
08/08/00: Journalistic cleansing at the Boston Globe
08/04/00: Junk science on trial
06/22/00: Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty
06/15/00: The end of U.N. peacekeeping
06/07/00: The Clinton regulatory miasma
06/01/00: Administration stupidity, congressional cowardice
05/25/00: The silence of the international community
05/18/00: Protecting the next generation

05/11/00: Freer trade with China will advance human rights

05/04/00: How not to save the Constitution

04/28/00: American tripwire in Korea long ago disappeared: Why are we still involved?

04/18/00: Clinton administration believes the IRS is too gentle, wants more auditors

© 2002, Copley News Service