Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 5, 2001 / 14 Tamuz, 5761

Doug Bandow

Doug Bandow
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Western blundering, Macedonian disaster

http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- LEAVE it to NATO to turn a problem into a crisis. Two years ago, America spurred ethnic Albanian separatism by kicking Serbian forces out of Kosovo. Today NATO is fomenting civil war in Macedonia by its maladroit intervention.

It wasn't supposed to be this way. In 1999, the West proclaimed its determination to promote democracy, halt ethnic cleansing, and create stability. For that reason, NATO ignored 350 years of international law and launched an unprovoked war against Yugoslavia, a nation which had neither attacked nor threatened any member of the alliance. The consequences have been ugly.

NATO proved to be no friend of democracy. Yugoslav demagogue Slobodan Milosevic manipulated anti-Western feeling to strengthen his hold on power. Only by choosing Vojislav Kostunica, a moderate nationalist critical of NATO's aggression, and keeping in the background pro-Western figures subsidized by the U.S., such as Zoran Djindjic, did the opposition triumph in elections last year.

Now the democrats are splitting apart under western pressure for Milosevic's extradition to the Hague to face justice at the hands of nations which themselves violated international law in attacking Yugoslavia. NATO's war sparked two rounds of ethnic cleansing. First, Belgrade responded to the West's attack by intensifying military operations and displacing hundreds of thousands of ethnic Albanian civilians. The U.S. then shamelessly used the consequences of its own actions to justify its assault.

Although most of the ethnic Albanians have returned, they quickly forced out a quarter of a million ethnic Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and even non-Albanian Muslims. NATO did little more than watch.

Stability has been the greatest victim of Western blundering. When NATO effectively provided the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) with an air force, it backed the most destabilizing force in the region.

Instead of gratefully accepting the West's muddled plan for an autonomous Kosovo within Serbia, the KLA continued to press for independence.

Kosovo is notable primarily for its crime and violence, as the KLA rules by night. The KLA has also transmuted into the Liberation Army of Presovo, Medvedja, and Bujanovac, now active in Serbia outside of Kosovo.

To combat the guerrillas, who were operating with impunity, NATO was forced to invite Serbian forces back into the buffer zone imposed after the 1999 war.

Even more disastrous is Macedonia, where one-third of the population is ethnic Albanian. The newly minted National Liberation Army has initiated an increasingly virulent armed struggle, which threatens to engulf the entire country.

Although there is no difference in principle between Albanian separatists in Kosovo and in Macedonia, this time NATO came down on the side of the Slav-dominated government.

The West's operating principle has always been anti-Serb rather than pro-human rights. Yet the government in Skopje is learning that friendship with NATO is of dubious value. European officials have been streaming into the country demanding restraint, criticizing the security forces, urging negotiations, and pressing cease fires.

As part of the latest agreement pushed by the West, NATO forces, including 81 Americans, escorted armed guerrillas from a village where they had been under attack by Macedonian army units. Nationalist riots then swept the capital of Skopje, as Slavic crowds chanted: "Albanians to the gas chambers."

President Boris Trajkovski called for calm while his rival, Prime Minister Ljubco Georgievski, maneuvered against him. Interior Minister Ljube Boskovski denounced NATO for protecting "terrorists."

As the government teetered, its room for maneuver, and negotiation, narrowed substantially. Yet some analysts, such as Mark Palmer, former U.S. ambassador to Hungary, would thrust NATO into the vortex - a "robust" military force to back an unambiguous "demand" that the guerrillas disband and the government withdraw its military to its barracks.

Even the Bush administration has indicated support for using 3,000 to 5,000 allied soldiers to help enforce any political settlement. In Bosnia, three warring groups, Croats, Muslims and Serbs, live together in an artificial state held together only through Western military occupation.

NATO forces could be there for generations. In Kosovo, Western soldiers have calmly stood by as Albanians did what Serbs were supposedly bombed for doing - committing ethnic cleansing. Only a permanent foreign garrison will stop Kosovo from becoming independent. In Macedonia, NATO would face another endless occupation on behalf of another fragile client.

Even if peace is found, it is unlikely to be more stable than those in Bosnia and Kosovo. Especially given the antagonism now felt by the Slavic majority against NATO. Indeed, peace seems far more distant after the alliance's maladroit aid to armed rebels in the midst of a guerrilla conflict.

President George W. Bush entered office voicing skepticism of the Clinton administration's humanitarian war-mongering. Unless the president adopts a quick policy U-turn, the Balkans tar baby will become his own, with disastrous consequences for his administration and America.



JWR contributor Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. Comment by clicking here.

Up


06/26/01: How best to honor Bill Clinton?
06/19/01: A maturing Europe?
06/15/01: Tell Beijing to mind its own business
06/06/01: Ukraine's boiling cauldron
05/31/01: Protecting privacy from Uncle Sam
05/22/01: America's Balkan quagmire
05/09/01: The Taiwanese flash point
05/01/01: Globalization serves the world's poor
04/24/01: Who's cheating whom?
04/10/01: The NCAA scam
04/03/01: Balkan stupidities
03/27/01: McCain doesn't want a 'risk for our country'
03/20/01: Dubious Korean alliances
03/06/01: Coercive patriotism
02/27/01: Bombing without end
02/20/01: A dose of misplaced outrage
02/13/01: Psst: Tax cuts for taxpayers. Pass-it-on
02/06/01: Bridging the unbridgeable gap
01/23/01: Left-wing demagoguery
01/16/01: The drug war problem
01/10/01: Politics and trade
01/03/01: Hope for liberty?
12/27/00: The debris of war
12/19/00: What's the rule of law for?
12/15/00: Ending silicone breast implant saga
12/05/00: Election may yield victor, but there are no winners
11/21/00: A Bush presidential mandate?
11/07/00: Exprienced Gore? Yeah, right
11/01/00: Interventionist follies
10/17/00: America's brightening prospects in Ukraine
10/11/00: GOP budget scandals
10/03/00: How a pharmaceutical 'crisis' was created
09/27/00: Clinton's empathy has helped nobody
09/13/00: AlGore's risky budget policies
09/05/00: Military readiness and Korean commitments
08/29/00: Let sleeping hypocrites lie
08/21/00: Targeting a journalistic pariah
08/15/00: European garrison for Kosovo?
08/08/00: Journalistic cleansing at the Boston Globe
08/04/00: Junk science on trial
06/22/00: Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty
06/15/00: The end of U.N. peacekeeping
06/07/00: The Clinton regulatory miasma
06/01/00: Administration stupidity, congressional cowardice
05/25/00: The silence of the international community
05/18/00: Protecting the next generation

05/11/00: Freer trade with China will advance human rights

05/04/00: How not to save the Constitution

04/28/00: American tripwire in Korea long ago disappeared: Why are we still involved?

04/18/00: Clinton administration believes the IRS is too gentle, wants more auditors

© 2000, Copley News Service