Jewish World Review July 20, 2004 / 24 Menachem-Av, 5764

Jim Shea

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Some charges don't ring true


http://www.jewishworldreview.com | I always have had the following policy toward the phone bill:


Don't ask, don't tell.


I never asked about all the mysterious charges, and they agreed not to tell me anything about them.


This made life easier for everyone.


The phone bill came, I paid whatever the company figured I should pay, and I got on with my life.


Granted, this left me open to getting hosed, but then that was going to happen anyway.


(If I'm not mistaken, I believe there is actually a "Subscriber Hosing Charge" included right there in the monthly statement.)


Anyway, as the result of a hysterical wave of household fiscal accountability - not of my own making, I might add - I have been required to go over the phone bill in some detail.


The experience has been more sobering than sticking your head out of a moving car window.


For example, did you know that every month you have to pay something called the "911 Surcharge," even if you didn't make any 911 calls?


Don't get me wrong, I'm a compassionate soul, but I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay a whopping 20 cents a month to cover someone else's misfortune.


Is there any reason people in dire need of emergency assistance can't call 911 collect?


Or that people who know they are going to be using 911 a lot - say neighbors of the shirtless guys who are always getting handcuffed on "Cops" - can't get a direct line?


I will, however, say this for the 911 charge: At least I understand what it's for.


The same cannot be said for something called the "Flat Residence Line."


After considerable thought, I have concluded that the only explanation for this charge is bad typing, and that the item was intended to read "Fat Residents' Line."

Donate to JWR


Personally, I think charging by the pound rather than the minute is kind of unfair. I mean, some people are just big-boned. And what if you are retaining water?


Another levy I have problems with is the "Number Portability Service Charge," which everyone pays in case someone wants to take their phone number with them when they move.


Who thought this one up, Karl Marx?


What's next, chipping in for the movers?


I could go on, but that would involve talking about something called the "Universal Service Fund," and frankly, I'd rather be watching shirtless guys getting handcuffed on "Cops." ___



Jim Shea is a columnist for the Hartford Courant. Comment by clicking here.


07/13/04 Calling all Kennedys
06/30/04 Where Prince, Sean and Madonna go, so go I
06/23/04 Advice from the managed
06/02/04 Tired of playing the numbers
05/19/04 Words on words: Just call me a bloviating boomer


Up

© 2004, The Hartford Courant Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.