The Fake News of 'The Handmaid's Tale'

Dystopian entertainment is all the rage now that Donald Trump is president, and the more unglued it sounds about an approaching American totalitarian state, the better, hence the liberal cheerleading for "The Handmaid's Tale," a TV series made for the streaming service Hulu.

It's based on a loopy 1985 novel by the radical feminist Canadian author Margaret Atwood, which imagines the United States quickly falling under a theocratic dictatorship based on its Puritan roots. America becomes a patriarchy called the Republic of Gilead. All women are deprived of their rights and forbidden to read. Due to environmental degradation, very few women can conceive a child, so a slave class of handmaids are created, whose entire purpose is giving birth. The handmaids wear dowdy red gowns (to represent menstrual blood) with large white bonnets that obscure their faces.

Liberals called this story "very timely" in 1985 and never stopped declaring it timely. On CBS, the TV series' star Elizabeth Moss proclaimed: "When everyone signed on, it felt incredibly relevant. It was written in 1985, and it's been relevant every decade since. I think it's just in this country, there's a relevance now that is striking everybody."

When Hillary Clinton accepted the Champion of the Century award from Planned Parenthood, she referred to the book and show as a warning for feminist vigilance. Moss gushed on CBS that this was a "huge honor," saying, "we all respect her so much." For her part, Atwood said that after the 2016 presidential election, "the cast woke up in the morning and thought, we're no longer making fiction — we're making a documentary."

This is why conservatives tend to laugh when liberals rail against the scourge of "fake news." There is no faker news than the notion that America is on the precipice of a Puritan patriarchy under President Donald Trump.

But the left pretends it's real. In an adoring NPR "All Things Considered" interview on April 26, host Audie Cornish pointed out: "The 'Handmaid's' costume has appeared in real life in recent times. Silent protesters wore similar costumes in a demonstration against the passage of abortion restrictions in Texas." She asked Elisabeth Moss, "How weird was that?" Moss replied: "Oh, not weird, awesome. I mean, so, so cool. This costume, this color, the bonnets, they're so iconic. And they stand immediately for feminism and women's rights. ... it's a very moving thing."

Like Moss, co-star Samira Wiley expressed how cool it was to make leftist propaganda. She said: "A television show, at the end of the day can be art, and it can elicit real change. I just feel so blessed to be able to be a part of something that can elicit real change."

In the real world, it's the "theocrats" like the Little Sisters of the Poor that are being forced to bow to the Libertine Left's demands to fund contraceptives for employees. The Democratic platform endorsed forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions.

Now imagine someone in 1985 had written a dystopian novel about how there was this large abortion conglomerate, a business so inhumane that it would rip unborn babies limb from limb and then sell the body parts to research laboratories. A female doctor babbles over a salad: "We've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver because we know that, so I'm not gonna crush that part. I'm gonna basically crush below. I'm gonna crush above. And I'm gonna see if I can get it all intact."

But to the left, the Republic of Gilead is "incredibly relevant," while actual videotapes of Planned Parenthood doctors are denounced as irrelevant fiction.

Previously:

• 05/10/17 Historians Still Ruining Obama's Mythical Memoir

• 05/05/17 Crude Comedians of 'the Resistance'

• 05/03/17 Sudden Media Anger Over Happy Talk to Dictators

• 04/28/17 Reagan's Lesson for Trump

• 04/28/17 Trump's 100 Days of Media Hostility

• 04/21/17 Hypocrisy in the Anti-O'Reilly Army

• 04/19/17 Two Very Different Tax Days

• 04/14/17 PBS: 'Learning' to Love Suicide Bombers?

• 04/13/17 Hillary Blames Self-Hating Women for Her Loss

• 04/07/17 'Complicit' First Daughters and Double Standards

• 04/05/17 Susan Rice Is Still Lying

• 03/31/17 Samantha Bee: Great World Leader?

• 03/29/17 Fox News Covers 'Inconvenient' Rape

• 03/24/17'Saturday Night Live' Supports 9/11 Killers

• 03/22/17 Time to Stop Taxpayer-Funded Propaganda

• 03/17/17 Hollywood Rebels Under Trump

• 03/15/17 Hiding the Media's Disapproval Rating

• 03/10/17 ABC's Huge Gay Propaganda Flop

• 03/08/17 The Media's Anonymous-Sources Hypocrisy

• 03/03/17 Trump Hits a Home Run

• 03/01/17 Networks Yawn as DNC Lurches Further Left

• 02/24/17 A Speech to Denounce Meryl Streep

• 02/22/17 Planned Parenthood's Pandering Press

• 02/17/17 'Saturday Night Live' smears Kellyanne

• 02/15/17 Suddenly, Friendly Reporters Are Offensive

• 02/08/17 The Great Manipulators at Time

• 02/03/17 Hail the Gender-Fluid Scouts?

• 02/01/17 2017: The Year Conservative Protests Are News

• 01/27/17 HBO's Supervillainous 'Young Pope'

• 01/25/17 The Ongoing Gosnell Blackout

• 01/20/17 Snoozing at Teachers Who Abuse Children

• 01/18/17 Michelle Obama's Cult in the Media

• 01/13/17 Hollywood Vs. the 'Fascist' Election Result

• 01/11/17 Fawning Farewells? Not for Republicans

• 01/06/17 Freedom of Association Is Great ... for Libs

• 01/04/17 Can Speculation Be Defined as News?

• 12/30/16 Cultural Winners and Losers of 2016

• 12/28/16 The Newspapers Bully Sen. Sessions

• 12/23/16 The real War on Christmas . . . is a real war

• 12/21/16 Who is advocating for 'banana republicism'?

• 12/16/16 Obama Underlines Failure at 'The Daily Show'

• 12/14/16 Whitewashing the Black President's Legacy