Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Dec. 26, 2003 /1 Teves, 5764

Jan L. Warner & Jan Collins

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


How the government bilks seniors


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Q: My wife and I have never made waves, but those days are over! Our health insurance premiums and medical expenses continue to increase, our assets were decimated by the stock market crash, and we're getting hit with taxes on our Social Security benefits because we're trying to make ends meet by making more money.


It's a shame that, while seniors are down, we're kicked by the lawmakers who voted for Medicare reform, and are sold out by the AARP, which promoted the act for its own selfish reasons. There are more than 40 million of us seniors, yet we have no trustworthy voice. The tax on our Social Security is just one more punitive measure assessed against us. Is there a way to avoid this unfair tax and get someone to stick up for us? Had I known it was going to be this bad, I would never have retired.


A: We agree that seniors have been getting the short end of the economic stick from more than one direction for a long time. One need only look at the huge financial benefit the AARP stands to rake in as a result of the "new and better" Medicare program to understand that its support of this legislation was a self-serving business decision that is not in the best interests of the majority of its members. In fact, AARP's financial records reflect that more than half of its millions of dollars in annual revenues come from the sale of insurance-related products. Coupled with vote-hungry politicians who want to pull the wool over the eyes of seniors at least one more time before next year's elections, we have yet another example of government run amuck.


To make matters worse, while politicians talk about their commitment not to raise taxes, they don't say much about why 50 to 85 percent of the Social Security benefits of many Americans are taxed based upon a punitive formula used only to calculate taxes on Social Security.


Here's how they take you to the financial woodshed: First, they calculate your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) by adding, for tax purposes, your adjusted gross income to your tax-exempt interest. Then, they add to your MAGI one-half of your Social Security benefits, thereby arriving at your "provisional income." If you are single, there will be no taxes on your Social Security benefits until your "provisional income" exceeds $25,000. If you are married and file joint tax returns, your Social Security is not taxable until your "provisional income" exceeds $32,000.


Donate to JWR


Of course, your adjusted gross income includes not only income you earn from odd jobs trying to keep up with inflation, but also interest, dividends, capital gains, distributions from IRAs, etc.


Unmarried Social Security recipients with provisional incomes ranging from $25,000 to $34,000 — and married couples with provisional incomes ranging from $32,000 to $44,000 — can expect to pay taxes on up to half of their Social Security benefits. Called the "Reagan Tax," revenues from these taxes go to the Social Security trust that, during the next 10 years, anticipates pulling in more than $177 billion from taxes on your Social Security benefits.


Unmarried benefit recipients with provisional incomes of more than $34,000 — and married couples with incomes of more than $44,000 — can expect to pay taxes on up to 85 percent of their Social Security benefits. Called the "Clinton Tax," revenues from these taxes go to the Medicare trust fund that, over the next 10 years, anticipates banking more than $118 billion from taxes on your Social Security.


To add insult to injury, unlike income tax brackets, the income levels used to tax your Social Security are not adjusted annually. This means that more seniors are clobbered with the tax each year when they least expect it. And guess what? These rules also apply to Social Security disability and survivor benefits.


That's right. Your elected officials decided that they would cannibalize your Social Security payments in order to feed the very same kitty that writes your checks each month. They are repossessing part of the money you contributed into the Social Security trust while you worked.


Bette Davis knew what she was talking about when she said, "Aging isn't for sissies." But that was before seniors were penalized for working hard to increase returns to make ends meet. We suggest that either your elected officials don't know this tax exists, or don't know how confiscatory and punitive it is. Talk to them and, if they are in the dark, put them out to pasture next term. They don't deserve your vote.

Find this column helpful? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JAN L. WARNER received his A.B. and J.D. degrees from the University of South Carolina and earned a Master of Legal Letters (L.L.M.) in Taxation from the Emory University School of Law in Atlanta, Georgia. He is a frequent lecturer at legal education and public information programs throughout the United States. His articles have been published in national and state legal publications. Jan Collins began co-authoring Flying SoloŽ in 1989. She has more than 27 years of experience as a journalist, writer, and editor. To comment or ask a question, please click here.

Up



Dad's new wife took the inheritance
Parents' trustee choice a hidden blessing
Finding the money for home care
Elderly mom is sweet on a hunky aide
'Ziva' gets the scoop on nation's nursing homes
Care decisions for 'elder orphans'
Seeking help for dementia victims
Read admission-package 'agreements'; booting a patient once Medicaid kicks in
Can the kids block our cash flow?; childless couple agonizes over whether to use
powers of attorney or a living trust to manage our assets

Control your assets from the grave
Slacker son will blow his fortune; lawyer's role in "estate-planning"
Mom remarried and spent my inheritance; doesn't want daughter-in-law to receive anything from estate
Can we stop our brother from swindling us?
What Gifting Will Disqualify You From Medicaid
The 'magic' language for a power of attorney agreement
Is care insurance a healthy choice?
Is there protection against Medicaid costs?
Long-term care insurance comes up short
HIPAA -- too much privacy?; nursing home doc could care less
Private pay nursing home residents pay more
Separated families should use care managers
What Makes Up a Caregiving Team?
Who is the client, parents or children?:

© 2003, Jan Warner