Monday

May 13th, 2024

Insight

Baseball fans should root for gambling's expansion

Adam Minter

By Adam Minter

Published June 19, 2023

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. Just click here.

The next time your favorite baseball team negotiates a nine-figure deal for an injury-prone pitcher, blame the oddsmakers. They'll soon be the source of cash upon which baseball depends to sustain the sport's lofty pay packages.

Both Major League Baseball and media companies are vying to control the next wave of sports gambling, integrating betting into streamed broadcasts of games. The expansion of betting will make some baseball traditionalists queasy. But wary fans should consider the alternative — higher costs to watch or attend games as both teams and media companies grasp for new sources of revenue.

For years, baseball and other sports leaned upon regional television networks to pay them billions of dollars for the rights to broadcast games to the home fans. Now, cord-cutting is choking off that lucrative pipeline.

The question over who should benefit from the switch became more urgent two weeks ago, when a court ordered Diamond Sports Group, a Sinclair Broadcast Group subsidiary and the largest owner of regional sports channels, to cough up unpaid fees to four Major League Baseball teams. Diamond says it will pay up, but only if it is given the right to stream — as well as broadcast — MLB games.

For Diamond, the streaming isn't just about placing the games on your phone. Ultimately, it wants to integrate gambling into those streams. Want to bet on the next batter getting a hit, or even the nature of the next pitch? The odds could be displayed directly on screen.

But Major League Baseball, long averse to gambling, has no intention of turning over those rights. Instead, it wants to keep and exploit them itself, ensuring that young sports fans — who surveys show are far more likely to gamble than older fans — are buying MLB tickets and streaming packages. As the young fanbase grows, revenue from gambling-related sponsorships, advertisements and product fees (such as fees paid by sportsbooks for instant game data) will grow, too. In time, gambling will become as much a part of the national pastime as the strikeout.

It's an awkward twist. Since the 19th century, baseball has struggled to keep gambling from influencing the sport. The 1919 Black Sox scandal, in which eight players were banned for fixing the World Series, continues to influence decisions about gambling and maintaining the integrity of sports. Pete Rose, the all-time hits leader, remains barred from the sport and the Baseball Hall of Fame for wagering on games.

But baseball faces a crisis. It has an aging fanbase and a pace of play that's out of tune with short attention spans of viewers reared on apps and highlights (though recent changes including the pitch clock aim to speed things up). Younger fans are dropping their cable subscriptions, gutting baseball's decades-old economic model.

In October 1969, what later became known as the MSG Networks Inc. became the first regional sports network, a cable television channel that broadcasts sports programming to a local or regional area, when it aired a New York Rangers game exclusively to a few thousand Manhattan cable television subscribers. Rangers fans who didn't have access to the network (few did) either had to buy a ticket to the game, listen to it on the radio or read about it in the morning paper.

Many fans found the concept hostile (and still do). But for the Rangers and other franchises, it was transformational. As cable television expanded its reach between the 1970s and 2010s, so too did the potential audience of paying fans.

The money has been growing steadily for three decades. For example, between 2004 and 2020, the Chicago Cubs averaged $60 million a year in fees from its regional sports network. In 2020, a new contract lifted that average to $132 million through 2032, nearly a third of the team's total revenue in 2022. The regional networks in turn charged cable companies hefty fees to carry the game.

The growth was enticing to media companies like Sinclair, which through its Diamond unit acquired 21 regional sports networks in 2019 for $9.6 billion. The acquisition included exclusive local rights to 14 Major League Baseball teams.

The deal looked like a home run — even if pay-TV subscriptions had been in decline since 2010. Instead, it couldn't have gone worse. Over the last four years, Diamond's regional networks lost 22 million subscribers. Some of that was related to cord-cutting; other losses were the result of streaming networks — such as YouTube TV and Hulu — ending their agreements with Sinclair because of high fees to carry sports broadcasting. In March, Diamond filed for bankruptcy.

During a court hearing two weeks ago over what Diamond owes the four teams, MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred recounted telling Sinclair's CEO that MLB — not Sinclair — will determine how gambling is integrated into baseball broadcasts.(1) That process is already under way. Roughly half of major league teams have marketing relationships with betting apps, and players are now free to endorse sportsbooks. Meanwhile, a sportsbook operated by DraftKings sits outside Wrigley Field, home of the Cubs, and should open this year (pending license approval); DraftKings will benefit from the gambling; the Cubs and its concessions partner will get the food and drink revenue.

Other major sports are well ahead of baseball. The NBA has a standalone website devoted to gambling. During the just-completed NHL season, sports betting and daily fantasy team sponsorships grew 185%. And the NFL, the American sporting colossus, currently has three official sportbook partners; point spreads and other gambling data are now routinely integrated into pregame shows.

Baseball's gambling expansion won't please all fans, especially those familiar with the game's history. But the alternatives aren't attractive, either. Without a new source of revenue, teams are likely to turn to higher fees to watch (either through cable or streaming) and higher ticket prices. Smaller-market teams that can't charge fans more will cut back, creating more inequality between, say, the Minnesota Twins and the Los Angeles Dodgers.

That, too, will degrade the fan experience.

For baseball, it's time to roll the dice.

Previously:
PGA merger with LIV Golf is only the beginning
Farmers are fighting for our right to repair our iPhones
This column may, or may not, cause an allergic reaction
There's one Trump idea even libs should like

Minter is a Bloomberg View columnist. He is the author of "Junkyard Planet: Travels in the Billion-Dollar Trash Trade."


Columnists

Toons