Tuesday

December 16th, 2025

Insight

What makes this economic slowdown different from the others?

Conor Sen

By Conor Sen Bloomberg View

Published April 4, 2023


We’ve been watching slumps ripple through various parts of the economy over the past 18 months: technology startups and stocks, regional banks and growing concern about commercial real estate. Yet we’re still waiting for the wider labor market to feel the downturn.

Does it even have to? Prior bubbles or periods of economic excess have featured too much hiring and investing like we saw during the late 1990s boom. Or we’ve had excessive credit creation and construction, as we confronted during the mid-2000s. The downturns that followed those periods involved unwinding some of that activity, which led to declines in employment and investment.

But the excess we had in 2020 and 2021 at the national level wasn't about too much hiring or investing — it was mainly about the mistaken belief that interest rates would remain low. That’s the excess now being unwound. And while it’s painful for those making the adjustment, it doesn't need to lead to the kinds of job losses we’ve had in the past.

Think about what happened in the technology sector, which has experienced some of the most high-profile job losses over the past year. One big reason for the cuts was that some companies over-hired during the pandemic based on business trends that turned out to be unsustainable. A second reason is that rising interest rates have shifted investor priorities to expanding profit instead of just revenue, which has forced unprofitable tech companies to curtail their spending.

The website layoffs.fyi, which tracks layoff announcements in the tech sector, has recorded 317,000 job cuts from January 2022 through March 2023. Compare that with the 4.3 million jobs the US economy has added over the past year. The layoffs appear to have peaked in January, suggesting most of the rightsizing is behind us. So we made it through a tech employment correction with unemployment remaining low and the national labor market still strong.

SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT'S FREE. Just click here.

The bank crisis of the past month had nothing to do with bad loans or excess credit creation. During the pandemic, banks like Silicon Valley Bank took in a ton of deposits and used them to buy Treasury bonds. Those Treasuries fell in value as rates rose in the past year, resulting in losses for SVB. Depositors rushed to claim their money, SVB was overwhelmed and regulators stepped in. The crisis called attention to similar weakness in other banks, leading to broader concerns about the stability of the system.

And now those problems have put a spotlight on the commercial real estate sector. It was already struggling because of falling property values, but now it faces the added risk that banks will tighten credit to commercial borrowers. The office market’s problems are unique, but for commercial real estate more broadly the issue is that many properties were financed at very low interest rates, and because funding costs were so low they were bought at elevated valuations. Then as interest rates rose, valuations declined. That means any loans coming due will have to be refinanced at higher interest rates, which may not be workable relative to the cash flow produced by the assets.

But it's not like the commercial real estate business has been propping up the US economy. Investment in nonresidential structures as a percentage of GDP is at its lowest level in 20 years, down 40% from where it was in 2007.

And the kinds of buildings most in distress — such as older office buildings — generate very little economic activity. It can even be argued that when some of them default, go dark and get redeveloped, it will have a positive impact on economic growth because new construction is so much more resource-intensive than the day-to-day operations of a 40-year-old office building.

The unusual thing about this downturn is that the excess being unwound reflects more than a decade of low interest rates, an era that cemented the belief that fast growth and high inflation were relics of the past. If the late 1990s boom was defined by the phrase "irrational exuberance," then the low-interest-rate era has been emblematic of irrational pessimism. You generally don’t get too much hiring and investment across the whole economy when people are pessimistic about the future. And that’s why we aren’t likely to see the sort of downturn — including a collapse in the labor market — that we’ve had after cycles of excess in the past.

(COMMENT, BELOW)


Previously:
02/15/23 Higher mortgage rates is what the housing market needs now
01/06/23 The January inflation bump Americans should welcome
01/04/23 Why millennials are following boomers to the South
10/24/22 Two bright spots in a cooling housing market
08/18/22 Future remote workers need to network more --- in college
06/17/22 Housing market cooldown will only lead to more dysfunction
05/27/22 Welcome to our be-careful-what-you-wish-for economy
05/04/22 The Amazon economic indicator says inflation is easing
01/20/22 Don't call me on Friday. That's my 'me time'
01/06/22 2022 is the year to buy your first luxury electric car
06/03/21 The post-pandemic boom will have a sequel in 2022
05/31/21 Florida may lose some of its boomer shine
01/11/21 Colleges bet on football in their own K-shaped recovery
12/31/20 Just send the bigger bucks already
08/24/20 Young people can't buy homes until older owners . . . move on
08/18/20 Our pandemic love affair with e-commerce could soon sour
08/10/20 Booming 'zoom towns' should ease city housing costs
07/11/20 With a Biden economy, will America be condemned to relive the '70s?
07/14/20 Renting and homebuying swap roles in the covid-19 market
07/13/20 Markets may have a reason to rise along with covid-19 cases
04/27/20 U.S. economy may have hit the coronavirus bottom
11/12/19 The 2020 economy should feel a lot better: What to, realistically, expect
04/23/19: Gen Z is likely to temper aging socialist millennials
03/25/19: All signs point to a housing boom ahead
02/19/19: Trump's economic gamble might make sense
02/15/19: Scaring off Amazon will backfire for the Left
01/29/19: The 2020 election will shred the Obama coalition
11/15/18: Amazon proving the 'rich get richer'?
11/13/18: How gerrymandering can reduce the partisan divide
10/22/18: The politics of the next recession will be a disaster
08/02/18: The future of the US looks a lot like ...
05/05/18: Brick-and-mortar stores may start to make sense again
05/05/18: College admissions season is about to get much easier
05/03/18: Changing housing needs of millennials will change economic development
02/13/18: The big idea for Middle America is to think small
02/07/18: Dems are caught in a tax bill trap this year
10/25/17: Good times have come to Trump-leaning states

Sen is a portfolio manager for New River Investments in Atlanta and has been a contributor to the Atlantic and Business Insider.

Columnists

Toons