Why can't the
Instead, a recent
In an era with stronger party bosses, Paxton would never have been allowed to challenge Cornyn, full stop. Over a steep pour of whiskey at a billionaire's ranch in
And the bosses of the Democratic Party, perhaps over martinis at a spa resort outside
The goal for
Even so, the hypothetical polling match-ups still have Cornyn or Paxton beating either Crocket or Talarico every time. That's why my imaginary Democratic bosses would say, "We respect Crockett's political talent. But Talarico can flip a Trump district, and his unfavorability numbers are significantly lower. That means people won't show up to vote against him."
But my party bosses aren't real. Although Trump's endorsement seems to matter to a surprising degree, overall political party infrastructure is weak. "They can't make decisions about who should represent them and who their candidates ought to be. All they can do is act as stages for narcissists," said AEI constitutional scholar
I watched the first televised debate between Talarico and Crockett. In the strange times in which we live, I (a center-right conservative) found myself agreeing with their calls to end Trump's protectionist tariff racket, which is driving up costs and punishing our allies. I found myself nodding when Talarico called out the historic level of self-enrichment occurring in Trump's inner circle. I was soothed that neither of them called for abolishing ICE, but rather refocusing
I found myself predictably frustrated at other parts. You think health care is expensive now? Wait until you see the massive tax hikes Medicare For All would require — no, taxing only the rich can't cover it — and lose your employer plan. Universal healthcare systems in peer countries like the
Talarico's focus on public education is also good, especially early literacy efforts and tutoring. But school choice works, too; it shouldn't be treated like a punching bag.
And no one seems to want to talk about the federal deficit, the historic liability that drags behind us like a ball and chain, rattling particularly loudly for progressives given their proclivity for large government spending programs, from health care to universal child care.
A closing word for my rabble-rouser friends. I know that decades of "boring politics" is how we got to this anti-establishment moment. Archaic institutions (and people) didn't do enough. Things were too polished and buttoned up. But if the last 10 years have taught us anything, it's that different isn't always better. Raw is not more virtuous. Someone telling you lies and abusing the office in plain daylight is bad, too.
There are worse things to wish for than a boring primary.
(COMMENT, BELOW)
Abby McCloskey is a columnist, podcast host, and consultant. She directed domestic policy on two presidential campaigns and was director of economic policy at the American Enterprise Institute.
Previously:
• The Heritage Foundation sees the family crisis --- but not the fix
• The Right may rue expanding presidential powers
• Republicans have ideas on affordability --- Just not conservative ones
• Republicans Make Life a 'States' Issue' at Their Peril
• The GOP's identity crisis is deepening by the day
• What's worse than cherry-picked government data?
• A case for childlike wonder in a grown-up world
• Why giving matters, even for federal accounts
• Meta is failing kids. Lawmakers are failing them, too
• More affordable holidays are a presidential pen-swipe away?
• The gender wars are heating up --- on the right
• Too many kids can't read. Blame a lack of spelling tests
• Dems, curb your enthusiasm
• Vouchers aren't enough to fix US schools

Contact The Editor
Articles By This Author