Saturday

May 18th, 2024

Insight

A former Pakistani leader's death, and his wise peace plan that failed

Trudy Rubin

By Trudy Rubin Philadelphia Inquirer/(TNS)

Published February 17, 2023

Rumsfeld and Musharraf.


When I sat down for a poolside dinner in Villanova in late September 2009, I didn't expect to hear the inside story on how Pakistan and India had come tantalizingly close to making peace two years earlier.

But I was seated next to the guest of honor, former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, who had resigned under pressure in 2008. He was visiting with his longtime friend, Raza Bokhari, an immigrant from Pakistan to Pennsylvania who became a highly successful businessman and civic activist.

When Musharraf died in exile on Feb. 5 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, I couldn't help but remember what he had told me that evening in Villanova about the secret "back channel" talks that Indian and Pakistani envoys conducted from 2004 to 2007. Had the peace efforts succeeded, they might also have changed the course of the Afghanistan War by enabling Musharraf to crush internal Pakistani jihadis.

Instead, while dozens of guests chatted under torchlights, the former leader stared at his whisky glass and mourned. "We were so close," he said. His tone of regret seemed genuine.

Yet, it was his own missteps — and the political tightrope act he tried and failed to manage — that brought him to Villanova and a subsequent U.S. speaking tour, rather than to a celebration for resolving an insoluble conflict. In the wake of his death, the peace plan he laid out that night still seems the wisest course of action for Pakistan to follow, if that troubled country can ever find another leader with the guts to take it on.

A secular general who appeared with his wife and enjoyed a good whiskey, Musharraf was a study in contradictions.

As Pakistan's military chief, he was a hawk on Kashmir, the disputed, mountainous territory now divided between India and Pakistan, over which the two countries have fought three wars since their independence. For decades, Pakistan trained local jihadis to infiltrate the dividing line — known as the Line of Control, or LoC — and attack Indian soldiers.

Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

In 1999, Musharraf instigated a disastrous border conflict in the district of Kargil, when Pakistani troops secretly infiltrated across the LoC high in the mountains, but had to withdraw after fierce Indian resistance and U.S. political intervention on India's side. The Kargil War Museum, which I visited in 2018, still portrayed the conflict as if it were a victory.

Pakistan's support for anti-Indian jihadis eventually boomeranged, as some of them began attacking their own country's military. After 9/11, when the U.S. pressured Musharraf to help fight Al Qaeda and its Taliban supporters in Afghanistan, the so-called "Talibanization" of Pakistan increased. Having seized power in a 1999 coup, Musharraf finally recognized the danger and decided to change course.

"I thought we had to have peace for the sake of the entire region, and for India and Pakistan," he told me in 2009. "We could reap a lot of economic advantages." Musharraf sent his envoys to meet Indian counterparts in hotel rooms in Bangkok, Dubai, and London, trying to unravel the Kashmir Knot and two smaller territorial issues.

Musharraf explained that India had insisted it would never negotiate its current Kashmir border, including the LoC, and this had been unacceptable to Pakistan.

So he devised a compromise.

"I came out with a broad outline," he detailed. This included gradually demilitarizing the Line of Control and Kashmiri cities, maximizing self-governance on both sides of the line for the Kashmiri people, and a joint governing mechanism for Kashmir, to include Pakistanis, Indians, and local Kashmiri leaders.

Most importantly, the LoC would be porous, allowing Kashmiris to cross, do business, and visit relatives they hadn't seen for decades. "I wanted to make the Line of Control irrelevant, to open it in six to eight places and let trade flourish," Musharraf said firmly.

That way, Pakistan could say the line was finished, and India could say it still existed. "The Line of Control would become almost irrelevant in 15 years," he told me. It was a brilliant concept, although it attracted little U.S. media attention until a March 2009 article by South Asia expert Steve Coll in the New Yorker.

Many skeptics say the Pakistani army and the feared Inter-Services Intelligence agency would never have agreed to the plan, since fighting India was their raison d'ĂȘtre. Musharraf insisted they would have obeyed him. Other observers doubted the former president's sincerity since during the last two years of his time in office, Pakistan harbored Osama bin Laden. Musharraf's claim of ignorance is hard to believe.

We'll never know what might have happened. In 2007, just when both sides were "close" to a deal (in Musharraf's words), he fired the chief justice of the Supreme Court, causing a domestic furor that led to his August 2008 resignation. Jihadi groups linked with Kashmir resurfaced and conducted the November 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai. India nixed new peace talks until Pakistan cracked down convincingly on those jihadis.

And that is where things still stand.

But the Villanova story doesn't end there. After four years in self-exile in Dubai and London, Musharraf insisted on returning home to contest elections in 2013. By his side was his friend Bokhari, who at the time told me by phone that Musharraf wanted "to see the political status quo broken." Within weeks, however, the former president was put under house arrest and only allowed to leave for Dubai in 2016, where he lived until his death.

One can only mourn what might have been had Musharraf's political misstep not derailed peace prospects. "Yes, it is one of my regrets," he told me pensively, at that Villanova dinner long ago.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Trudy Rubin
Philadelphia Inquirer
(TNS)

Previously:

02/09/23: Earthquakes killed nearly 12,000 people this week. Three men are partly to blame

01/24/23: As Russia murders civilians in Dnipro, why won't NATO send weapons that could end the war?

12/28/22: What Zelensky worried about when he addressed a cheering Congress

12/13/22: The US-China conflict to watch is the Chip War --- which centers on Taiwan

09/14/22: Ukraine scores sudden breakthrough that should energize Western support

09/09/22: Queen Elizabeth's death deprives Britain and the world of a rock of stability

09/08/22: After Gorbachev's death, Putin wants the world to know he is the 'anti-Gorbi'

08/26/22: 6 months after Russia's war vs. Ukraine began, the West still won't give Kiev the weapons to win

08/15/22: Ukraine's civilian volunteers work to give aid and rebuild, even as Russia continues to bomb them

08/08/22: A trip near the front lines finds Ukrainian troops ready for a battle that could decide the war

06/13/22: The critical battles for Ukraine and for America are being fought right here, right now

05/02/22: Save Odesa to save the world from hunger and high food prices

05/02/22: Bloodless Ukrainian War, not utopian fantasy says one-time largest foreign investor in Russia

04/11/22: The only way to end Putin's war crimes

03/28/22: Don't let Putin's nuclear and chemical threats stop us from giving Ukraine what it needs

03/24/22: An elegy for Mariupol, where I walked six weeks ago. Now razed by Russian bombs

03/18/22: Zelensky's brilliant speech should impel Biden and Congress to protect Ukrainian skies

03/11/22: Mariupol's bombed maternity hospital exemplifies why NATO should protect Ukraine's skies

03/10/22: No 'no-fly zone'? Then NATO must find another way to protect Ukraine's skies

03/07/22: The third World War has already started in Ukraine. Europe and the US should wake up

03/04/22:Putin must be stopped from turning Kiev into Aleppo

03/02/22:Why is Belarus helping Russia invade Ukraine? An explainer on the latest in the conflict

02/25/22: What the UN should finally do about Russia

02/24/22: Why Putin's Ukraine aggression will change the world --- an explainer on how we got here

02/10/22: Ukrainian civilians train for war with cardboard guns: 'We are scared but we are ready

01/13/22:Putin wants to reestablish the Russian empire. Can NATO stop him without war?

12/10/21: Can Biden and NATO prevent Putin from invading Ukraine? Summit puts it to the test

12/02/21: Boris Johnson stirs up new Irish Troubles for his own personal political gains

11/22/21: Xi Jinping thinks America is on the rocks. Is he correct?

08/18/21: President Biden, get our Afghan allies on evacuation planes

08/18/21:The horror of Afghan women abandoned by Biden's troop pullout

08/09/21:China is pushing a big COVID-19 lie that makes a new pandemic harder to prevent

05/27/21: Punish Belarus leader for Ryanair hijacking before air piracy becomes dictators' new tool

04/14/21: Can Beethoven temper the political tensions between US and China?

06/01/20: US must stand with Hong Kong against Beijing's efforts to crush its freedoms

05/20/20: COVID-19 offers a chance to halt Iran's hostage diplomacy

05/21/14: Newscycle spurs visit to country my family fled

04/21/14: Blind to Putin's strategy?

12/24/13: Obama's Syrian indifference has led to more death and destruction. Meet some real heroes

12/13/13: Where liberals have come to love the military

12/09/13: The China strategy

11/05/13: Return to Iraq is worth a close look

10/01/13: Obama's call to Iran: Who was really on the line?

09/11/13: How Obama got Syria so wrong

07/24/13: It's time for Obama to tell Putin 'nyet'

05/15/13: What Russia gave Kerry on Syria --- very little


Trudy Rubin is a columnist and editorial-board member for the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Columnists

Toons