Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review August 9, 2001 / 20 Menachem-Av, 5761

Michael Kelly

Michael Kelly
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

An insane love, a failed grade, a lost job --- all with a great perspective


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- The Russians last week released John E. Tobin Jr., a 24-year-old Fulbright scholar whom they had accused of spying and had convicted and jailed on marijuana charges. The trumped-up case against Tobin was an obvious retaliation for the United States' expulsion of Russian spy-diplomats in retaliation for the recruitment of the traitor Robert Hanssen. Tobin spent six months in prison.

So, what does John E. Tobin Sr., the father of this wrongfully punished young man, have to say? In a news conference in Moscow this week, he said that, in a way, his son had "had a marvelous experience. . . . He's gotten to see Russia from the inside."

When I read Tobin's father's words, I could hear my own father. My father, Tom Kelly, is 78, and he has four grown children, and they have had their ups and downs. And over all the years, for every up, my father has been there to say how splendid (and how deserved) was this particular up; and for every down, he has been there to say how splendid (though not at all deserved) was this particular down.

An insane love, a failed grade, a lost job -- there is nothing that befalls one of his children in which my father is not able to find "a marvelous experience." This is not to say that he is irresponsible. If you (assuming you were one of his children) were to tell him that you had always felt yourself to be a duck trapped in the body of a human, and that you were determined to rectify the situation through trans-species surgery, he would argue (gently) against the idea. What about your mother's feelings? he might say. And what about duck season, what about duck l'orange?

But he would not say that no Kelly had ever been a duck and by God none was ever going to be one, or that he had not fought the Nazis and worked two jobs for 10 years to send you to college to have you spend the rest of your life sitting around on your tail bobbing for duckweed.

And if you went ahead and had yourself duckified anyway? Oh, he would proclaim it through the neighborhood: What a wonderful, what a brilliant, what a brave and clever and good thing this was to do -- and what a duck you were! Was there ever such a duck?

What you might call the duck, or the Tobin, response is not peculiar to a few men, and it is not, despite all appearances, irrational. It is the necessary reaction to the quality by which most men define what it is, in the long run, to be a good husband and a good father. For what by now amounts to most of his life, my father has thought of himself, and judged himself a success or failure, in primarily these terms. And in these terms, at a minimum, what a good father is supposed to do for the people he loves is fix whatever goes wrong with them.

But life presents much -- wars, famines, depressions, sicknesses, broken hearts and broken lives -- that is beyond fixing. So, the good father endures by denying. This, admittedly, can be annoying, especially to women, who generally regard as a mysterious lunacy the male view that a problem expressed is a problem that must be addressed. My mother has often marveled, with exasperation, that it is impossible to engage my father in a simple complaint about the weather. If he admitted that 99 in the shade was intolerable, or that four days of rain was enough, then he would have to fix it, for the sake of the children. And, in fact (although this has never been acknowledged in my family), my father has no control whatever over the forces of nature.

Yet there is something to be said for the compulsions of the fathers. Men, as has been frequently noted, have their failings. The urge to make things right is their counter-failing, their allegory to women's urge to nurture. The male urge is of course ridiculous. Who can fix the world, even for one child? But its ridiculousness makes it great. In every life, there should be someone who believes that whatever goes wrong must be fixed, and if not fixed, must at least be made to go away.

So, happily, it was for me. In the house where I was lucky enough to grow, the weather was always balmy, rain or shine. And life was always good, good or bad, and the children were always successes, succeed or fail. And the experiences were always marvelous.

Michael Kelly Archives


Michael Kelly is the editor of National Journal. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

© 2001, Washington Post Co.