Jewish World Review Nov. 16, 2005 / 14 Mar-Cheshvan,
Ignoring economics, Part II
A newspaper headline "Lawmakers Struggle to Define Gasoline Price
'Gouging'" shows how phony the current Congressional jihad against the
oil companies is. "Price gouging" is one of those phrases that evoke strong
emotions but have no definition.
Where particular states have passed laws against "price gouging," their
different definitions reveal how slippery and arbitrary the concept is.
Kansas attempts to define price gouging as selling at prices more than 25
percent higher than they were before some disaster. Georgia makes it illegal
for prices to rise after the state government has declared a state of
emergency, unless the seller can prove that his costs have gone up.
What all this boils down to is that prices higher than what observers
are used to are called "gouging." In other words, prices under normal
conditions are supposed to prevail under abnormal conditions. This
completely misunderstands the role of prices.
Why do prices exist at all? To cause things to be produced and made
available to the public and to cause consumers to limit how much they
consume. Why then do prices suddenly shoot up? Because there is either less
of a supply available or more of a demand, or both.
When hurricanes knocked out both oil drilling sites and refineries
around the Gulf of Mexico, there was suddenly less supply of oil. That meant
higher prices and higher profits.
What do higher prices do? Force people to restrain their own purchases
more so than usual. What do higher profits do? Cause more money to be
invested in producing whatever is earning higher profits, and this in turn
expands output. Isn't a larger supply of oil and a reduced consumption of it
what we want?
Whenever there have been sharp rises in gasoline prices, whether
nationwide or locally in California, Senator Barbara Boxer has loudly
demanded an investigation of the oil companies. These repeated
investigations over the years have repeatedly failed to turn up anything
other than supply and demand.
The real irony is that it has been precisely liberals like Barbara
Boxer who have been the chief obstacles to increasing the supply of oil
because they are dead set against drilling for oil in more places and
against building more refineries.
When you refuse to let supply rise to meet rising demand, why should
you be surprised much less outraged when prices rise?
Yet there was Senator Boxer on nationwide TV, decrying the high
salaries of oil company executives, who are making perhaps half of what a
number of baseball players make or a tenth of what movie stars make. The
insinuation is that their salaries and oil company profits are what drive up
gasoline prices. But there were no hard facts to back up either insinuation.
Given the enormous sums of money involved in the production of oil,
even if all the oil company CEOs worked for nothing, there is no hard
evidence that this would be enough to reduce the price of gasoline by even
one cent per gallon. As for oil company profits representing "greed," as
the Barbara Boxers call it these profits per gallon of gas are much less
than federal taxes per gallon of gas. But the government is never called
"greedy" by liberals.
These political circuses have a cost that can be even greater than the
high cost of gasoline.
We went through all this before, back in the 1970s, when oil company
executives were also hauled up before Congress and denounced on TV by
politicians. Inflammatory but vague and unsubstantiated charges went flying
hither and yon in the media.
This demonization of oil companies made it politically inconvenient to
remove price controls on oil when other price controls from the Nixon
administration years were repealed.
The net result was that the shortages which price controls produce
disappeared for other things but remained for gasoline. Motorists had
trouble finding gasoline and sometimes spent hours waiting in long lines at
filling stations. This was the hidden cost of political demagoguery.
Anyone nostalgic for those days of waiting in gasoline lines, which
sometimes reached around the block, can jump on the bandwagon for gasoline
price controls or other laws to crack down on "Big Oil." Just be aware that
there is a cost. There is no free lunch and no free demagoguery.
Comment on JWR contributor Thomas Sowell's column by clicking here.
Thomas Sowell Archives
© 2005, Creators Syndicate