Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 19, 2001/ 21 Adar 5761

Wesley Pruden

Wes Pruden
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Knocking hard heads at the Pentagon -- NOT for nothing is the mule the symbol of the Army. Sometimes you have to whack mules and generals between the eyes to get their attention.

Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, took such a hit this week after the Pentagon stubbornly refused to take a hint from the commander in chief to think again about handing out black berets, like khaki skivvies, to every man (and woman) in the Army.

The final whack came not from President Bush, who offered a gentle hint, but from Congress. When the congressmen who pass on defense appropriations told the Pentagon to pay attention, someone at the Pentagon finally decided that maybe someone should.

A spokesman for Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense, said the department would not only look into the idea of universal black berets, but at the decision to bypass U.S. manufacturers in violation of the law to award contracts to factories in China, of all countries.

The idea of universal black berets, the symbol of the Rangers, came from Gen. Shinseki himself, as "a symbol of the transformed Army for the 21st Century." Generals are not accustomed to anyone questioning whether their bright ideas are really as bright as they think they are, and when George W. Bush suggested that the Army take another look the generals and their colonels-in-waiting apparently decided that it was not necessary to humor the commander in chief on this one.

The Rangers, a lean, mean outfit trained to take the toughest assignments, are jealous of the black beret, earned by the kind of physical punishment that a lot of folks would regard as hazing, and don't understand why their symbol should suddenly be given to cooks, clerks and latrine orderlies just to make them feel good about themselves and the 21st century. The Rangers have worn the black beret since 1951, not long after the 2nd Battalion made the Rangers' reputation on Omaha Beach. The "boys of Pointe du Hoc" lost 135 of the 225 men who wrested the position from the Germans.

When the Rangers, usually in the voice of ex-Rangers no longer in the Army and no longer subject to military discipline, protested, the Army brushed them off. Gen. Shinseki declined to meet them, and his spokesman blew off their concerns: "We are not seriously investigating that there is a morale problem because we don't believe there is one." At one point the Army put out a statement from a sergeant major that "the decision has been made, and it is not up for discussion."

Too bad for the Army, but sergeant majors and lieutenant colonels and even decorated four-star generals don't get to decide what is and what is not up for discussion. It's odd that the Pentagon, usually deft at this kind of Washington dancing, stumbled so badly, first ignoring the president, then brushing him off, and not doing what it should have known it would have to do, until a growing number of congressmen began to make noise. Everyone was clearly trying to give the general, whom everyone admires, an opportunity to retreat with his flag still aloft.

Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, finally wrote to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. He chose his words carefully, but his meaning was clear enough. "I am requesting a 'stand down' to permit officials of the Bush administration an opportunity to review the policy and report to you. This was a decision made during the Clinton administration which I believe, in light of the outpouring of conscientious concern from both active and former soldiers, deserves a second look by the Bush administration."

He was not rendering a final judgment on the black berets, the senator said, but when one of the former Rangers who marched 750 miles to Washington to protest offered the senator, a Marine, a black beret for himself, he declined. "I'm not going to take it because I didn't earn it."

Gen. Shinseki is, alas, right about one thing. The 21st century Army is "a transformed Army," and the proof of it is the sagging morale that the general's spokesman insists the Army doesn't see. The military is led by senior officers of a new generation, who appear to believe that the traditions of selfless service and battlefield sacrifice are not as important as they once were. We've got computers now. When girls and gays can do it, who needs the example of Stonewall Jackson and Phil Sheridan and Alvin York and George S. Patton in "a transformed Army?"

But one day sooner if not later the "transformed Army" will be called on to fight a tougher foe than Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard or unorganized riffraff in the Third World. When that day arrives there won't be anything virtual about the reality.

JWR contributor Wesley Pruden is editor in chief of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.


03/14/01: Second thoughts on the faith initiative 03/12/01: Getting punch drunk on disappointment
03/07/01: The dazzling triumph of Saddam Hussein
03/05/01: How can a real gent tell the lady no?
02/28/01: Who won that war? Best not to look
02/26/01: Bonnie & Clod, gifts who keep on giving
02/21/01: It's Hot Springs week in downtown Harlem
02/13/01: Some of our riots seem to be missing
02/07/01: When a hate crime is something to love
02/07/01: Lifting a few spoons, cutting a few taxes
02/02/01: A few small surprises and a large lesson
01/31/01: Serving fried crow in the press mess
01/26/01: The gathering storm over Jesse Jackson
01/23/01: A graceless getaway, a graceful beginning
01/19/01: Once more to wave the bloody shirt
01/16/01: Bring on the lions, the clowns are ready
01/12/01: The dastardly plot to restore slavery
01/10/01: Mr. Lott's generosity to the Dems
01/05/01: Looking to the past for a bad example
01/03/01: A modest proposal for Arkansas folk
12/19/00: The reflexive sneer at George W. Bush
12/15/00: Taking inspiration from John Birch
12/12/00: It's time to raise high Florida's standards
12/08/00: A President Bush, and about time, too
12/05/00: Here come the judge --- and he's got a hook
11/28/00: Cry no tears for Al, lawyers are the losers
11/21/00: The useful loathing of America's sons
11/17/00: When this is all over, we spray for lawyers
11/14/00: Something murky in the twilight zone

11/10/00: Something sinister in Palm Beach

11/07/00: Low days in the life of the ruptured duck

11/06/00: A little race baiting in the final hours

11/01/00: Creator gets a hard time on the hustings

10/27/00: The sorcerer rides to rescue his apprentice

10/25/00: The founding father with a story to tell

10/23/00: A lonely passion for religious rights

10/16/00: Spending blood on the folly of fools

10/11/00: A big night for the embellisher-in-chief

10/06/00: AlGore's black problem

10/04/00: In headlong pursuit of the bigot vote

10/02/00: A modest proposal for Rick Lazio

09/27/00: When folks at home give up on a scamp

09/25/00: Gore plot exposed! The secret minutes

09/18/00: Playing politics with the blood supply

09/14/00: Al sets out to find his 'tolerance level'

09/12/00: When it's time for a thumb in the eye

09/07/00: Making a daughter a campaign asset

09/04/00: A footnote to the lie: How he beats the rap

08/30/00: Unbearable lightness of a cyberjournal

08/21/00: Clinton chickens on AlGore's roost

08/16/00: The long goodbye to California's cash

08/09/00: Innocence by proxy is a risky scheme

08/07/00: After insulin shock, an authentic rouser

08/02/00: When it gets hard not to get a little giddy

07/31/00: George W.'s legions of summer soldiers

07/26/00: He's set a surprise --- or a trap for himself

07/24/00: How do you serve a turkey in August?

07/19/00: Would Hillary sling a lie about a slur?

07/17/00: Process, not peace, at a Velveeta summit

07/12/00: The Texas two-step, a nudge and a wink

07/10/00: The Great Mentioner and his busy season

07/05/00: No Mexican standoff in these results

07/03/00: Denting a few egos in the U.S. Senate

06/28/00: Bureaucracy amok! Punctuation in peril!

06/26/00: The water torture of American resolve

06/21/00: The happy hangman is a busy hangman

06/19/00: Dick Gephardt finds a Dixie dreamboat

06/14/00: Taking a byte out of innovation

06/12/00: 'Go away, little boy, you're bothering us'

06/07/00: When a little envy is painful to watch

06/05/00: Fire and thunder, bubble and squeak

05/31/00: South of the border, politics is pepper

05/26/00: Running out of luck with home folks

05/24/00: The heart says no, but the head says yes

05/22/00: A fine opportunity to set an example

05/17/00: The Sunday school for Republicans

05/15/00: Hillary's surrogate for telling tall tales

05/10/00: Listening to the voice of an authentic man

05/08/00: First a lot of bluster, then the retreat

05/02/00: Good news for Rudy, bad news for Hillary

04/28/00: The long goodbye to Elian's boyhood

04/25/00: Spooked by Castro, Bubba blinks

04/14/00: One flag down and two memorials to go

04/11/00: Consistency finds a jewel in Janet Reno

04/07/00: Here's the good word (and it's in English)

04/04/00: When bureaucrats mock the courts

03/28/00: How Hollywood sets the virtual table

03/24/00: Dissing a president can ruin a whole day

03/20/00: When shame begets the painful insult

03/14/00: The risky business of making an apology

03/10/00: The pouters bugging a weary John McCain

03/07/00: When all good things (sob) come to an end

© 2000 Wes Pruden