Jewish World Review June 16, 2005/ 9 Sivan
Denouncing Dean can decide Maryland race
Now is the time for Martin O'Malley to show off his political acumen by publicly denouncing DNC chairman Howard Dean for his recent comment that the Republican Party is a monolithic mass of "white Christians." Dean, a patrician who grew up on Manhattan's Upper East Side, also drew attention by saying that many Republicans "have never made an honest living in their lives."
Given that some nationally prominent DemocratsSen. Joe Biden, John Edwards, and Virginia's Gov. Mark Warner for examplehave at least tepidly criticized Dean's frequent over-the-top blasts at the GOP, O'Malley is already behind the curve in making a pitch to Maryland's independent and moderate Republican voters who've been offended by Dean.
Why give Bob Ehrlich the opportunity to lump hear-no-evil Democrats in the "politics of personal destruction" camp that Dean now leads? As the Governor's strategists constantly remind Marylanders, their boss comes from working-class roots, was a scholarship student at Gilman and Princeton, and if O'Malley doesn't act quickly, Ehrlich will surely claim the moral high ground on the issue of making an "honest living."
Assume, for the time being, that O'Malley dispatches Doug Duncan in the Democratic gubernatorial primary next year. Does the Mayor really want Deanif he's still chairman in 2006coming to Maryland on his behalf and risk an off-hand slur against Ehrlich or Michael Steele? O'Malley has enough trouble keeping his own gaffes to a minimum: his remark last February, quickly clarified, that President Bush is "attacking" American cities like al Qaeda was dumb. He doesn't need Dean to alienate, for instance, the small but possibly decisive bloc of black voters who are socially conservative.
Rep. Harold Ford, a young charismatic Democrat who's running to replace Bill Frist as one of Tennessee's senators, has made his move to distance himself from Dean. On June 9, Ford appeared on Don Imus' syndicated talk radio show a favorite of the Beltway crowd and indicated he was unsure about having Dean campaign for him next year. Ford, who is black, said: "I'm a Democrat and I'm a G-d-fearing one. I grew up in church… I think Governor Dean sometimes gets a little excited at the mouth, and says things that are simply not true… [H]e does not speak for me, and I know he does not speak for a majority of Democrats and I dare say Republicans in my home state."
The most recent Sun poll (published in April) showed O'Malley leading Ehrlich by a margin of 45-39 percent, which may lead to some complacency among his supporters. I think the Mayor is not so comfortable with those numbers (which came after an uneventful legislative session in Annapolis), unless his scrapbook of glowing press clippings leads him astray. The April 25 issue of Time, which tapped O'Malley as one of the country's top five big-city mayors, was good publicity nationally, but won't have much effect locally. One sentence in the blurb about "Wonk 'n' Roller" O'Malley must've made him cringe: "O'Malley grew up in Washington's tony Maryland suburbs but fell hard for blue-collar Baltimore while attending the University's law school there."
All that was missing in the Time accolade was a reference to the city being a "shot and beer kind of town," a cliché that was outdated 20 years ago.
A more accurate assessment of the expected O'Malley-Ehrlich race was in the June 9 Washington Post, a fairly comprehensive piece by John Wagner. The reporter, like most his colleagues, quotes UMBC professor Thomas Schaller (you'd think that Schaller and Johns Hopkins' Matt Crenson were the only political analysts in the state), as saying that O'Malley, whom he supports, "If you can show success in managing the toughest of the state's 24 jurisdictions, you can make a good case that you're qualified to lead the other 23."
As for the issue that won't go awayslotsO'Malley has endorsed at least limited legalization in the city, a stand that Ehrlich will claim as a victory for his still-unrealized signature issue. The Sun's editorial page, an unrelenting foe of slots, has yet to criticize O'Malley for this view, and probably won't. But Sun columnist Dan Rodricks threw in the towel on slots in a May 15 column, tweaking O'Malley (he wrote off Ehrlich a long time ago) as a candidate "without an ounce of political courage or morality" for "jump[ing] back on the slots float" because he doesn't want to lose the Preakness and wouldn't mind some "campaign cabbage" from the gambling lobbyists. Rodricks also writes: "You know what? I don't care anymore. Let them have their slots. Install thousands of them in all the racetracks and hang them by every urinal in Maryland House… [L]et's just open the door and let the casino boys in. That way, we get to keep the Preakness."
Unless a recession hits Maryland very soon, O'Malley won't get much traction on that issue since the state's unemployment rate continues to fall below the national average (4.3 percent in April).
Even though Maryland remains a Democratic state O'Malley can't expect a coronation. That's why it's imperative to immediately repudiate Dean and the left wing Bush/Ehrlich bashers and ingratiate the high percentage of voters who won't adhere strictly to party affiliation.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor "Mugger" -- aka Russ Smith -- was the editor-in-chief and CEO of New York Press. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]