Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 6, 2000 / 3 Sivan, 5760

Nat Hentoff

Hentoff
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


The Liar's legacy and America's delusions


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- AS FUNDS CONTINUE to be raised for Bill Clinton's presidential library, I would be eager to see whether there'll be a room opened only by special and very limited permission.

Where, for example, will there be the contempt-of-court ruling against him by U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright for "undermining the integrity of the judicial system?" No other president had one.

And in what room will there be another unprecedented part of his legacy the recommendation by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct that William Jefferson Clinton be the first sitting president to be disbarred? He will likely be out of office before his appeals are concluded, but in this, too, he is as Duke Ellington used to say of certain musicians "beyond category."

Mr. Clinton's supporters, a horde of energized Uriah Heeps, criticized the disbarment recommendation. But they understandably ignore what the Arkansas State Supreme Court said in 1998, when it disbarred another attorney: "There is simply no place in the law for a man or woman who will not tell the truth even when his interest is involved."

This further unraveling of the president's contention that he has been the victim of relentless persecution for an essentially private sexual relationship leads me to predict which books about this modern Job will be of most value to historians of the American presidency a century from now.

Barely meriting a footnote, I expect, will be Jeffrey Toobin's widely publicized "A Vast Conspiracy: The Real Story of the Sex Scandal That Nearly Brought Down a President" (Random House). This New Yorker magazine reporter and ABC-TV legal analyst concludes that the brouhaha was all about "a menopausal man having an affair with a young woman from the office."

"The Hunting of the President: The Ten Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton" (St. Martin's Press) delivers its message right on the cover. The authors, Joe Conason and Gene Lyons, devote many pages and extensive source notes to demonstrate that the president who is only human like the rest of us was done in by an intricate conspiracy of his insatiable enemies.

But there is no substantive analysis in their book of how Mr. Clinton violated the Constitution as he and his janizaries these two authors among them tried to stave off his conviction on the articles of impeachment. Historians to come will find an extensive record of Mr. Clinton's serial contempt for the Constitution in Richard Posner's "An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment and Trial of President Clinton" (Harvard University Press). Judge Posner chief judge of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and the author of remarkably penetrating books on the law goes far deeper than Messrs. Toobin, Conason and Lyons:

"Clinton engaged in a pattern of criminal behavior and obsessive public lying, the tendency of which was to disparage, undermine, and even subvert the judicial system of the United States, the American ideology of the rule of law, and the role and office of the president." To do all of that he engaged in "obstruction of justice, including perjury when committed in either a civil or a criminal proceeding" and "tampering with, or intimidating witnesses."

Purchasing this book
-- linked at right --
helps fund JWR.

The best journalism is a rough draft of history, and future historians will spend considerable time with "Truth at Any Cost: Ken Starr and the Unmaking of Bill Clinton" by Susan Schmidt of The Washington Post and Michael Weisskopf of Time magazine.

After interviewing more than 150 of those directly involved including Ken Starr and 25 members of his staff, along with 14 of Mr. Clinton's lawyers, advisers and aides, 13 officials of the Justice Department and the Secret Service, and many others in the cast of this constitutional drama they have produced the factual narrative, including abundant source material, to illuminate Judge Posner's constitutional and other conclusions.

Ken Starr himself is not spared for his failures as a bumbling prosecutor, and Mr. Clinton could be played in a movie by W.C. Fields if this were a comedy. Mr. Clinton, of course, would be Micawber in "David Copperfield."

As Henry Hyde said before the full House Dec. 18, 1998: "Impeachable offenses are those which demonstrate a fundamental betrayal of public trust. They suggest the federal official has deliberately failed in his duty to uphold the Constitution and laws he was sworn to uphold."

Future historians will be puzzled as to why so many Americans and writers of books allowed themselves to be gulled by this song-and-dance man.



JWR contributor Nat Hentoff is a First Amendment authority and author of numerous books. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up

05/30/00: Reining in the majority's will
05/23/00: Press swoons for a bunco artist
05/15/00: The China that tourists don't see
05/08/00: The coverage of Reno's lawless raid
05/01/00: In Clinton and Castro's best interests
04/24/00: Elian's human rights
04/17/00: Crime's down, but arrests keep rising
04/10/00: Teacher brings Constitution to life
04/03/00: The Americans who keep disappearing
03/27/00: The censoring of feminist history
03/20/00: Should there be a chaplain in Congress?
03/13/00: Big labor, big China, spinning Gore
03/03/00: The ACLU violates its principles --- yet again!
02/28/00: Still two nations?
02/11/00: You bet we should disbar Bubba
01/31/00: Where was Jesse?
01/24/00: Is suing church for sexual harassment an entanglement?
01/18/00: Will Miranda make it?
01/11/00: ACLU: Guilty until presumed innocent?
01/03/00: Liberty lion should be Man of Century
12/28/99: Drug tests that tear families apart
12/20/99: Get ready for decisive ruling on school vouchers for religious schools
12/13/99: Guess who is taking the lead in anti-slavery movement? Hint: It ain't Rev. Jesse
12/06/99: When we refuse to buy the 'otherly-challenged' excuse
11/29/99: Expelling 'Huck Finn'
11/22/99: Pleading the First
11/16/99: Goal of diversity needs rethinking?
11/08/99: Prosecution in darkness
11/02/99: The accuracy that's owed to readers
10/26/99: Disappeared Americans
10/18/99: The blue wall of silence
10/11/99: Bill Bradley's speech tax
10/04/99: 'Technicalities' that keep us free
09/27/99: Our 'Americanism'-ignorant generation
09/20/99: ACLU better clean up its act
09/13/99: A professor of infanticide at Princeton
09/07/99: The Big Apple's Rotten Policing
08/23/99: Lawyerly ethics
08/16/99: To Get a Supreme Court Seat
08/02/99: What are the poor people doing tonight?
07/26/99: Lady Hillary and the press

© 2000, NEA