Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 20, 2000 / 22 Mar-Cheshvan 5761

Betsy Hart

Betsy Hart
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The Dems' pathetic craving for power -- AT LEAST one thing is clear amid the chaos overtaking the Florida presidential election: modern-day Democrats want and need power more than their Republican counterparts, and that's why they are so good at doing anything and everything to get it.

The Democrats running the show in Florida are both brilliant and conniving, and they consistently catch Republicans flat-footed. So it was with the hand-recount issue there. Gore campaign chair William Daley evidenced the Gore-camp's thinking when he essentially said two days after the election that any vote total in Florida that did not favor Al Gore wasn't a legitimate outcome. So the question for them was only "where do we get the votes we need to put our guy over the top?" I can't think of anyone better than Daley, son of legendary Chicago Mayor and Democratic machine-runner extraordinaire Richard J. Daley, to suddenly find some extra votes for Al Gore.

Voila, the Gore junkyard lawyers came up with the idea of a third, manual count exclusively in a few of the most heavily Democratic counties in the state. And soon they were using subjective, partisan persons instead of objective if imperfect machines to reexamine often unreadable ballots. They employed differing and always changing pregnant/falling/detached "chad" standards to determine the "intent of the voter." So gee, what a surprise that in looking again at votes in precincts that voted 20 and 50 to 1 for Al Gore, holding ballots and squinting at them as we've all seen on our TV screens, they would determine on the all-important third try that more voters really "meant" to vote for Al Gore than were counted the first two times.

(Naturally, when the duly elected elections officer in Florida, a Republican, tried to enforce the law and the deadline for the election returns - which the Gore team did not appreciate - they both took her to court and smeared her as being like a "Soviet Commisar.") This conniving caught the Bush team off-guard, and has forced them to pursue their own messy legal action. But it shouldn't have come as a surprise. After all, the Gore camp gave cigarettes to homeless people in Wisconsin to get them to vote; they illegally kept the polls open late in St. Louis to get extra ballots in, and they essentially claimed during the campaign that George W. Bush himself shared some blame in the racially motivated dragging death of James Byrd Jr. and was even more directly responsible for the death of at least one old person in a nursing home in Texas. And they are, of course, the party of Bill Clinton - a president who disgraced his country, committed perjury, was impeached and then wanted an apology from the Republicans for the ordeal. At least Richard Nixon had the grace to resign in shame, something modern-day Democrats have long ago shaken off.

But even this pales when one considers that Bill Clinton and Al Gore gleefully took boatloads of illegal campaign cash from the Communist Chinese, while at the same time jumping through hoops to make sure that the Chinese got sensitive nuclear technology they sought.

Sure Republicans can play rough, and negative, and they've had some downright unscrupulous leaders. But no one knows how to play lawless, intimidation, hardball politics like these modern-day Democrats.

It's easy to see why they do it. By and large, Republicans want to be left alone. Left alone to raise and educate their children, spend their money, run their businesses and their lives as they see fit. Not so today's partisan Democrats. Their agenda is one of controlling others through the means of government, particularly through presidentially appointed judges and regulators, and telling others how to raise and educate their children, spend their money and run their businesses and lives.

Appointing partisan judges is particularly important to such liberal Democrats because they can rarely get passed through state legislatures or Congress what they can get forced through courts: Whether it's gun control, abortion on demand, keeping religion out of schools, special rights for homosexuals, racial quotas, draconion environmental regulations, forced busing or a host of other issues, liberal Democrats need a coercive government to work their will on an American people that would never vote for such an agenda.

And so no matter how the saga in Florida ends, it will have illustrated once again that Republicans by-and-large consider government a distasteful necessity, while today's partisan Democrats too often see it as life support itself. And that's why they, and not Republicans, are far more likely to beg, borrow, and yes even steal to get control of it.

JWR contributor Betsy Hart, a frequent commentator on CNN and the Fox News Channel, can be reached by clicking here.


11/14/00: A potentially fateful indication of Gore's mindset
11/07/00: What do women really want?
10/24/00: Spare the rod ...
10/19/00: Gore is a liar --- period
10/12/00: Making the case for marriage
09/28/00: "Mommy, what's abortion?"
09/20/00: Gay righters no longer seek just tolerance but endorsement
09/14/00: The stupidity of smart growth
09/07/00: It takes more than a kiss
08/30/00: Helping out at school is more than an obligation
08/24/00: Family time comes far down the summer schedule
08/16/00: A tale of two wives
08/09/00: The Brady Bill isn't achieving its aim
08/01/00: Attention feminists: How to really keep our daughters safe
07/25/00: Everything is protective: the parents, the gear, the age
07/18/00: Say it ain't so, Ann
07/11/00: Limiting a child's choices
07/06/00: Accounting for your health
06/21/00: It's a bad time to be a boy in America
06/13/00: The state of our unions
06/02/00: Federalizing care of kids
05/17/00: The natural food threat
05/09/00: To stop gun violence, keep families intact
05/03/00: Pass the fat, please
04/25/00: Something just for boys
04/18/00: When toleration goes too far
04/10/00: Women warriors
04/05/00: Confessions of a soccer mom
03/30/00: Getting an education about schools
03/22/00: If you're a parent, act like one!
03/14/00: Not child advocates, but self-advocates
03/06/00: McCain not what he seemed at first
02/29/00: An effective answer to social problems
02/22/00: The feminists' newest target: Toys
02/06/00: Harassing the harassers
01/31/00: It doesn't take a village to raise a child --- it takes a scheduler
01/25/00: Psuedo science and global warming
01/18/00: Socially responsible nonsense
01/10/00: Monica may be onto something
12/27/99: Sometimes it matters quite a lot what government thinks
12/17/99: Teens have no inherent 'right to privacy'
12/10/99: Buying a minivan and tossing the SUV
12/03/99: On the mommy track
11/05/99:The waste of recycling
11/01/99: Welcome to Harvard pre-school
10/22/99: No disaster for women that Dole is out
10/19/99: 'Humanitarian' hypocrites
10/15/99: On a first-name basis with a three-year-old

© 2000, Scripps Howard News Service