Jewish World Review April 28, 2006 / 30 Nissan 5766

Mona Charen

Mona Charen
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Crusaders, lies and videotape | The terrorists appear to have had a p.r. meeting — or separate meetings. Both Osama bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi have released tapes, one audio and one video. It may be, as the White House suggests, that the apparent progress toward forming a government of national unity in Iraq is the trigger for these howls, or it may be that Zarqawi is bidding to replace his "prince and commander" in the hearts of blood-thirsty Muslim fanatics. In any case, both tapes are descents into a fantasy world where up is down and black is white.

Bin Laden begins by cursing "Crusader journalists," which seems to refer to the Danish newspapers that published cartoons featuring caricatures of Mohammed. The "umma" (worldwide Muslim community), bin Laden declares, has "reached consensus that he who offends or degrades the messenger (Mohammed) would be killed." Not exactly. The zealots and extremists have so proclaimed, while the majority retreats into an intimidated silence.

Not that the world was panting to know where bin Laden stood on the matter. Is anyone shocked to discover that he blesses those who attempt to slit the throats of cartoonists? But the tape does not stop there. It's a tour d'horizon of hot spots around the globe, all viewed through the twisted lens of a mass murderer who thinks himself destined for the Muslim equivalent of sainthood.

He calls upon Muslims to resist the "Crusaders" in Iraq and Afghanistan, denounces what he calls the "Crusader-Hindu war" against Muslims in Kashmir, condemns France's decision to forbid head scarves in public school classrooms (ironically, though the Franks were major players in the actual Crusades, they are not designated as Crusaders), and views the world's pressure on the Hamas government of the Palestinian territories as a "Crusader-Zionist war on Muslims." Zarqawi too accuses Iraqis who are at long last forming a government of being tools of the "Western Crusaders."

"Crusader" is the terrorists' all-purpose epithet for the United States. (And our leaders lend this drivel some degree of credibility. Bill Clinton expressed the view that the West really started this clash of civilizations with the Crusades.) As for bin Laden, he sees Crusaders all around him.

Okay, let's see now, where on the globe will you find people possessed of a religious zeal and political power-lust who are willing, even eager to kill in the name of G-d? In Washington, D.C.? In Los Angeles? In Boston? How about Tehran, Baghdad, Riyadh and Amman?

Yes, a thousand years ago European Christians responded to the call of Pope Urban II and took up arms to liberate the Holy Land from the infidels. On the journey eastward, the first Crusaders murdered and pillaged a number of Jewish communities, and when they conquered Jerusalem in 1099, they slaughtered unknown numbers of Muslims and Jews within the walls of the city. As historian Kenneth Harl explains in his history of the period, the primary motivation of those who joined the First Crusade was the belief that by "taking the cross" they would achieve remission of sins. But memo to Islamic fanatics: that was a (SET ITAL) millennium (END ITAL) ago. In the intervening 10 centuries, Christians have become the most irenic of confessions. And even in the immediate aftermath of 1099, the Crusaders provided a better life to their Muslim subjects than they had known under Muslim rule (marred as it was by warfare among the Abbasids, Umayyads and Seljuk Turks).

Further, the Crusades, as aggressive as they seem to modern eyes, were a response to the staggering expansionism of the Muslim armies as they spread their faith throughout the Near East during the three centuries following Mohammed's death.

Every aggressor paints himself a victim — Hitler had his grievances, too, we recall. But what is truly staggering about the bin Laden tape is his call for Muslims to take up arms against the peacekeeping force in Darfur. Three hundred thousand African Muslims have been murdered and two million displaced by raiders (the Janjaweed) working in concert with the Islamic government of Sudan. A small force from the African Union has been overwhelmed. President Bush has called for NATO involvement. On April 30, a broad coalition of Christians, Jews and human rights organizations will hold a "Rally to Stop Genocide" in Washington, D.C. Do the Islamists call for aid? Do they offer it? On the contrary, bin Laden calls for "mujahadin . . . to prepare all that is needed for a long-term war against the Crusaders and thieves in Western Sudan."

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

"Do-Gooders : How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help (and the Rest ofUs)"  

Do-Gooders is a guide to the smug know-it-alls in politics, the news media, and Hollywood who think they know what’s best for the poor and other needy Americans. From Marian Wright Edelman to John Kerry, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Rob Reiner, this book will skewer the liberals by name. Sales help fund JWR.

Comment on JWR contributor Mona Charen's column by clicking here.

Mona Charen Archives


© 2005, Creators Syndicate