Jewish World Review Dec. 8, 2004 / 25 Kislev, 5765
Jack Kelly
Draft alternatives
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
The Philadelphia-based Foreign Policy Research Institute held a conference
Monday on the future of reserve military forces. The site was the Union
League club.
"The classic French-Renaissance-style League House, which occupies an entire
city block in the center of Philadelphia's commerce and cultural district,
is listed in the National Historic Register," says the League's web site.
"With its brick and brownstone facade and dramatic twin circular staircases
leading to the main entrance, the house dates back to 1865...Inside, the
traditional decor is accented in rich leather, wood and polished marble."
Being inside the club reminded me of how much America's elite has
degenerated.
The Union League was founded in 1862 to support the policies of President
Abraham Lincoln. On the walls are portraits of prominent Philadelphians who
gave their lives fighting for the Union. There are also plaques with
many, many names on them of Union League members who died fighting in
World Wars I and II. You can find similar plaques at Ivy League colleges.
I saw no plaque honoring Union League members who died fighting in Vietnam
and subsequent conflicts. Nor, I dare say, are there such monuments at
Harvard or Yale.
For much of our history, those who have benefited most from living in
America felt a special obligation to keep her safe and free. But the most
privileged among us are now the Americans least likely to serve their
country, and least likely to express gratitude to those who do.
This has long been a burr under the saddle of one of the presenters at the
FPRI conference, Northwestern University Prof. Charles Moskos, America's
most prominent military sociologist. Charlie was drafted into the Army in
the late 1950s, benefited from the experience, and thinks others of
America's "best and brightest" would as well.
Moskos would dearly love to have the draft reinstated, but recognizes that
this is not going to happen. So he's touting a 15-month enlistment option
for the Armed Forces that would be appealing to college students. In
exchange for their service, volunteers would receive generous education
benefits or repayment of outstanding student loans.
His fellow panelists gave Charlie a hard time, but I think he's on the right
track. My draft number was 363. I'd have gone after women and children.
But I dropped out of law school to join the Marines as a private. I had a
bunch of reasons good, bad and indifferent for doing so.
But I was doing something my parents and my classmates regarded as insane.
What pushed me over the edge was the two-year enlistment option I could
do my tour and get on with my life and the G.I. Bill. I wouldn't have
joined if I had to sign up for four years or more, or if I didn't have the
rationalization that I could always finish law school on the G.I. Bill.
As it turned out, I loved the Corps. It was the best experience of my life.
I wound up spending 14 years in the Marine and Army reserves.
We don't need to compel the service of the elite to have an outstanding
military. But we ought to encourage it.
Moskos' plan for a 15-month enlistment would work for military occupation
specialties such as military police and infantry where extensive training is
not required, if it were coupled with four years of obligated service in a
drilling reserve unit. Reserve service is a wonderful part time job for
college students.
Moskos' plan could be advanced by terminating what he calls "the G.I. Bill
without the G.I." The government currently gives low interest loans and
sometimes grants to college students in exchange for, well, nothing. The
government should provide benefits only in return for service.
This is a sensible reform, but it wouldn't have much impact on the most
privileged.
In Robert Heinlein's novel "Starship Troopers," only veterans could vote.
That goes too far. But suppose we made it a requirement for holding federal
elective office that candidates for the House and Senate must have an
honorable discharge from the U.S. armed forces?
This would require a constitutional amendment to do, and that would be hard.
But it beats trying to bring back an unneeded and unwanted draft just to get
the most privileged among us to do their duty. And the principle is sound.
Those who are unwilling to serve should not be permitted to lead.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Jack Kelly, a former Marine and Green Beret, was a
deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan
administration. Comment by clicking here.
Jack Kelly Archives
© 2004, Jack Kelly
|