Jewish World Review Dec. 31, 2003 /6 Teves, 5764

Terry Eastland

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

America is right to press for religious freedom worldwide | Why don't you Americans mind your own business? That, in essence, is what the French thought the other day when a State Department officer took issue with President Jacques Chirac's proposal to outlaw the wearing of head scarves by Muslim girls, large crosses by Christians and skullcaps by Jewish boys in public schools.

John Hanford, the U.S. ambassador at large for religious freedom, effectively called on the French to understand that such displays, so long as they are a "heartfelt manifestation of" people's beliefs and not acts of provocation, constitute "a basic right that should be protected." A French official was offended, as the French can be, and told The New York Times that "never have you heard a French diplomat comment on an internal debate in the United States."

But the French surely know by now that part of what it means to be an American diplomat is to comment on matters "internal" to other countries. Indeed, Mr. Hanford made his remarks about the French proposal in response to a question during a press conference on the State Department's annual report on the state of religious freedom worldwide.

The report identifies (1) totalitarian and authoritarian regimes that aim to control religious belief and practice (Burma, China, Cuba and North Korea, among others); (2) regimes that, while not trying to control minority religions, are hostile to certain ones (Saudi Arabia and Turkmenistan, for example); (3) nations that have laws favoring certain religions and thus place others at a disadvantage (Belarus and Brunei); and (4) nations that stigmatize certain religions by wrongly associating them with dangerous "cults" or "sects" (Belgium, Germany and, yes, France).

The actual infringements on religious liberty run the gamut from outright torture and execution (Burma) to job discrimination (Sudan).

The authors of the report weren't fooled by the presence of laws discouraging discrimination on the basis of religion. Looking more closely, the authors found countries that have such laws yet have failed to enforce them in cases involving minority religions. The list includes Bangladesh, Egypt, Guatemala and Nigeria.

Donate to JWR

This is the fifth straight year the State Department has issued a report on international religious freedom. This year's report, like the previous four, makes clear that millions of people around the world are being discriminated against and persecuted on account of what they believe.

No other country issues reports on international religious freedom. But, then, no other country is quite like ours. America was conceived in liberty, especially religious liberty, and our commitment to religious liberty only has deepened over the years. Moreover, because the Declaration of Independence teaches that liberty is the birthright of everyone everywhere, we long have felt compelled to let other nations know that truth and encouraged them to embrace it. And in doing so, we often have emphasized the right of conscience.

The cause of religious freedom is worth our pressing — especially for two reasons. The first is that religious liberty often involves other liberties, such as those of assembly and expression. They are, as Mr. Hanford said, "the seedbed of democratic development." To the extent we promote religious freedom, we also are promoting democracy. And — the second reason — to the extent there are more democracies, there will be fewer state patrons of terrorism, fewer places where terrorists can train and organize.

Advancing religious liberty internationally isn't easy, nor is progress guaranteed. But the world will be in America's debt to the extent that our efforts expand the number of nations in which freedom of conscience is honored and protected. As Mr. Hanford said the other day, "This is part of our nation's work in the world, of which we can all be proud."

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Terry Eastland is is publisher of The Weekly Standard.Comment by clicking here.

10/22/03: Case involving pledge should be easy for justices to decide
10/15/03: Dean places political considerations ahead of national security
08/28/03: Colleges creating policies that discourage intellectual exchange
08/14/03: Progressive reform could end up limiting government
07/30/03: Congressman, please consult Miss Manners
07/23/03:Words reveal much about Bush: Maybe there is a reason he won't retract sentence
07/08/03: Justices also said affirmative action must end
06/25/03: Court's law school ruling isn't persuasive
06/24/03: Whatever the Lynch story, everyone wants it
06/18/03: A judge shows he can set aside his strong views
06/04/03: Boston church becomes politically important again
05/28/03: YWCA names culture warrior as its new head
05/23/03: Washington steps in to help teach history
05/13/03: It may take another election to change filibuster rules
05/07/03: Paige works to improve education from inside out
04/30/03: Iraqis have choice to make regarding religious freedom
04/16/03: Is it acceptable for an education secretary to state a personal preference for religious schooling?
04/08/03: University officials must put academics ahead of athletics
04/02/03: Support for our soldiers means support for their orders
03/27/03: 'Free Iraqi Forces' underscore Bush's sincerity
03/18/03: Dems misunderstand judge's job
03/13/03: Justices show right restraint in ruling on anti-crime measures
03/05/03: America's imperial intentions
02/25/03: The weakness of Dems' stated reason for their filibuster makes you wonder whether it is the real reason
02/19/03: Administration fine-tunes religious rights in public education
02/12/03: France and Germany need to be reminded of the necessity of a strong, even predominant America
02/06/03: Judiciary's 'balance' -- or lack of it -- is our doing
01/29/03: The child who almost wasn't
01/21/03: President decides to punt on affirmative action case
01/14/03: Bush's faith has influenced his conduct in public office
01/07/03: Dems need ideas, not more microphones
12/17/02: Gray Lady should learn that times have changed
12/10/02: Will High Court be guilty of activism?
12/03/02: The missing facts in news accounts of Saudi Princess Haifa's putative 'charity'
11/26/02: Americans don't have to be worried about Big Brother
11/19/02: Texas' reputation for flamboyance may be revised
11/11/02: Bush now can repair confirmation system
11/05/02: Dems shouldn't believe too strongly in history
10/30/02: Snipers had lots of motives
10/23/02: No one should be shut out of marketplace of ideas
10/15/02: Open hearings that could imperil the nation
10/08/02: Debating the clear and present danger
10/01/02: A great awakening in China?
09/25/02: Abortion, again? The settled but still unsettling law of Roe v. Wade
09/18/02: A relevant presidency--and irrelevant U.N?
09/10/02: Ashcroft's obtuse judicial statement
09/04/02: The Education Gadfly stings again
08/28/02: So then let the president declare war
08/21/02: Will Bush finally 'fix' affirmative action once and for all?
08/06/02: President must take up cause of Egyptian democracy warrior
07/31/02: With each war, civil liberties are curtailed less

© 2003, Terry Eastland