Jewish World Review Dec. 30, 2002 / 25 Teves, 5763

Dan Abrams

Abrams
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


It's the holidays, let me order my wine!


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | I have a little wine collection, so this irks me to no end. If I want to legally buy a hard-to-find California wine directly from the winery, I have to either ship it to a friend in one of a handful of states and then pick it up, or go to California myself.

But if I want to buy a wine from a New York State winery, for example, then it's no problem. I can just give them a call. Wholesalers and other middlemen have been furiously fighting to keep the current laws in place. In the vast majority of states, I should add. In those states, the wineries have to sell to wholesalers, who then sell to retailers, who then sell to the consumers.

We can't even legally send wine to friends as a gift. It's a nice racket, but their justification makes no sense. The wholesalers claim that they're helping to regulate alcohol sales, to make sure minors or dry counties don't end up with the moonshine. And the states claim that the 21st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution allows them to regulate alcohol.

So, retailers and instate wineries can mail the wine? If someone's goal is just to get drunk on fine wine, this does nothing to prevent that. Finally, federal judges in New York, Virginia, North Carolina have stepped in and called it unconstitutional. A violation of the commerce clause that prevents states from favoring their own interest over that of other states, and that, of course, is what this is.

And regardless of its constitutional status, this is just an outdated system. It's the holidays. Let me order my wine.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.




JWR contributor Dan Abrams anchors “The Abrams Report,” Monday through Friday from 6-7 p.m. ET on MSNBC TV. He also covers legal stories for “NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw,” “Today” and “Dateline NBC.” To visit his website, click here. Comment by clicking here.

Up

12/20/02: The judge who dropped the ball in the battle over who owns Barry Bonds' 73rd home run ball, valued at nearly $2 million
12/19/02: Requiring Pakistani and Saudi male visitors to register with the INS
12/18/02: Why many seem to misunderstand Iraq's international obligations
12/17/02: Shouldn't there be a standard for what would trigger a war with Iraq?
12/13/02: Judge Rose by what he did on the field
12/12/02: Manhattan prosecutors making a mistake in the Central Park jogger case
12/11/02: Why our government refuses to fully cooperate in the prosecution of a possible 9/11 conspirator
12/10/02: Hezbollah, not a terrorist organization, says Canada
12/09/02: The world's cynical view of America
12/04/02: Why we need to stop electing judges
11/27/02: Why men should be able to sue women who lie about who's the daddy
11/26/02: Training lawyers to be touchy-feely
11/25/02: The story of a real American hero
11/22/02: In Illinois, academics lawyers, judges hurting their pro-life cause
11/15/02: A close reading of Iraq's letter of acceptance makes it clear that Saddam will almost certainly refuse to live up to its terms
11/14/02: Al Jazeera: A state-sponsored mouth-piece
11/13/02: Should Moussaoui be sent to a military tribunal?
11/12/02: Should human rights activists complain about the detainees' treatment?

© 2002, MSNBC