Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 9, 2000 /11 Mar-Cheshvan 5761

Howard Fienberg and Iain Murray

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Last voter out, please
turn off the TV

http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
GLANCING OVER the projected winners in Florida reads a bit like biblical chapter and verse: Gore 8:27 and Bush 2:17-but the accuracy of these retracted claims was far from infallible. As the networks nurse their overzealous black eyes, we're reminded that exit polls are actually little more than educated guesses. Pundits love them, and frequently they are right. But not always. These gauges often spring leaks.

Exit polls involve face-to-face polling of voters as they leave the voting booths on election day. For the most part, they are conducted by the Voter News Service (VNS), a consortium of TV networks and the Associated Press, which also sells its data to other news organizations. Traditional telephone polling, when it's not horrendously flawed, nets such low response rates these days (30-40 percent on average) that the simplicity of exit polls is quite refreshing: unlike pre-election polls, there is no difficulty sorting out registered or likely voters, since only confirmed voters are polled. But exit polls rely on a small sample of voting precincts and, like any other survey, can run afoul of non-response or false responses. For example:

  • VNS overstated the final Democratic vote in the 1992 presidential race. Many believe that this was due to Perot voters being relatively suspicious and unwilling to cooperate with the exit polls.

  • In the 1989 Virginia gubernatorial election, exit polls showed African-American Democratic candidate Douglas Wilder winning by 10 percent. Since he actually won by less than 1 percent, many feel that some white voters, feeling perhaps a bit guilty, lied about voting for Wilder.

  • In the Republican primaries in New Hampshire in 1992 and in Arizona in 1996, exit polls overestimated the vote for Pat Buchanan. The most likely reason for the mistakes, which resulted in misleading news coverage? Zealous Buchanan voters were more willing to participate in exit polls. In 1992, exit polls predicted a George Bush win by only a small margin over Buchanan -- Bush actually won by 16 points. In 1996, exit polls put Bob Dole a distant third after Steve Forbes and Buchanan - Dole actually came in a close second to Forbes.

With strong and passionate third party pushes coming from both Buchanan and Ralph Nader this year, we should have factored in their voters potentially tilting the exit polls to compensate for their paltry numbers.

Of all the pitfalls in the path of exit polling, the largest is the absentee ballot. In 1993, Washington state first let everyone vote by mail and over half of the state's voters are expected to vote this year by absentee ballot. Voters in Oregon's tight vote this year will vote almost entirely by mail.

In 1996, according to the Associated Press, absentee and early balloting encompassed more than ten percent of the total vote in 18 state, more than 20 percent in nine states, and more than 30 percent in three states. In 1998, the total vote included more than 10 percent in absentee and early ballots in 15 states, more than 20 percent in eight states, more than 30 percent in five states and more than 40 percent in three states. This year, Washington states expects over half of its votes to come via mail, while voters in Oregon will vote almost entirely by mail. This doesn't even take into account the thousands of supremely important ballots cast by Floridians abroad.

Empirical evidence of impact on exit polling arose as early as the 1982 California election, when exit polls predicted Democrat Tom Bradley would defeat Republican George Deukmejian for the governorship and that Democrat Jerry Brown would defeat Republican Pete Wilson for U.S. Senate. Both predictions were wrong because so many Republican voters cast absentee ballots. As restrictions on absentee, electronic and mail ballots lessen, exit poll projections inevitably suffer, since many voters are not available at a real voting booth.

Major news media have agreed not to announce exit poll results for each state until its polls have closed, in order to avoid influencing voters-a principle violated this year by projecting Florida when voters in the panhandle, in the Central time zone, were still in line outside voting booths. But it is still important for us to remember that the results at which journalists are grinning or grimacing during election coverage are not the real deal.

Historically, exit polls have been more reliable than tracking polls and the news media treat them as gospel. But if the poll result is close, anyone who tells you that they know who has won is lying. Voters would be best served not by staying up to watch the back-and-forth volleying of projection tennis, but by simply going to sleep and letting the results speak for themselves.

Howard Fienberg is research analyst and Iain Murray is senior analyst with the Statistical Assessment Service (STATS), a nonprofit nonpartisan organization dedicated to improving public understanding of scientific and social research. You may comment by clicking here.




Up

© 2000, STATS