Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Sept. 19, 2002 / 13 Tishrei, 5763

Bill Schneider

William
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Pundits in the crosswinds

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Political forecasting works like weather forecasting. Only riskier. Forecasters are trying to say which way the political winds will be blowing two months from now.

Let's see how they've blown in past midterms.

The issue that dominated the 1982 midterm election was President Ronald Reagan's suggestion that he would consider postponing cost-of-living increases for social security recipients. A big wind blew Democrats into Congress that year on a pledge to ``save social security.''

1986 was a status quo year. The winds were calm. That's why it came as a big surprise when Democrats regained control of the Senate. It happened because of history, not politics. A gale-force wind had blown a lot of Republicans into the Senate six years earlier, in 1980. When the winds calmed down in 1986, many of those new Republican senators were left at sea.

At the time of the 1990 midterm, the U.S. was engaged in a showdown with Saddam Hussein over Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. But the build-up to war had not started, and foreign policy did not dominate the campaign. 1990 was a recession year. President Bush had broken his no-new-taxes pledge. The winds blew in an anti-incumbent direction that year. It was a rare election in which incumbents of both political parties, on the average, saw their margins of victory diminish. Not many incumbents lost, so the message of dissatisfaction was not immediately apparent. But it turned out to be a warning of things to come in 1992, the year of angry voters, Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot.

1994 was a hurricane year. A huge storm blew the Democratic majorities in Congress away. The issue? Bill Clinton, with his tax hike and ``Hillary care'' and gays in the military and gun control. Turnout surged as southern whites, religious conservatives and gun owners flooded the polls to make a statement against President Clinton. Southern Democrats who had survived for decades on their personal reputations suddenly found themselves labeled ``Clinton supporters'' and got swept away.

1998 was the year of impeachment. A lot of people voted to save a President who had made them rich. The shock came when the President's party broke tradition and gained seats in the House of Representatives -- the first time that had happened in a midterm election since 1934. The unexpected Democratic wind rattled the Republican majority and blew House Speaker Newt Gingrich away.

What's the forecast for this year's midterm? The answer appears to be, crosswinds.

If national security issues dominate the election, the wind is expected to blow in a Republican direction. But even that's not clear. War anxiety has been growing, and so far, it seems to be helping Democrats. Voters alarmed by the Bush Administration's ``rush to war'' with Iraq could try to stop it by voting Democratic for Congress.

But President Bush says he intends to get support from Congress. When asked whether that meant Congress would have veto power over his decision, President Bush demurred. He intends to ask Congress for support, not for permission. Congress is likely to give its support, possibly before November, which could make the Iraq issue moot in the election.

The Bush Administration has just begun to make its case for war. ``Today the process starts,'' President Bush said on September 4. Which may be why the Iraq debate has not yet penetrated the campaign. The September 2-4 Gallup poll asked, ``Which issue will be more important to you when you vote for Congress this November -- the economy, or the possibility of war with Iraq?'' Americans continued to say the economy would be more important, by 57 to 34 percent -- about the same margin as in mid-August.

If economic issues dominate the midterm, the prevailing winds are expected to be Democratic. But forecasters have not yet detected any sign of a big Democratic wind. Congressional Republicans have protected themselves by passing a corporate responsibility bill and a prescription drug bill in the House. ``We're happy to fight it out in their box,'' the executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee told The New York Times ``The bottom line is that the Republicans delivered, and we delivered on issue after issue.''

But what's true for Iraq is also true for economic issues: the debate is just starting.

``If you believe that their greater amount of money will allow them to say anything they want and get away with it -- well I don't think they can pull it off,'' House minority leader Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.) replied.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


To comment on JWR contributor William Schneider's column, please click here.


09/10/02: Has Bush lost his momentum?
09/04/02: Bush's European problem
08/13/02: Overdosing on prescription drug promises
08/06/02: The Dems' secret weapon
08/01/02: Time for prez to let Cheney go
07/30/02: GOPers, feeling scared, get realistic
07/18/02: Soccer Moms, say hello to NASCAR Dads
07/11/02: Israel via Alabama
06/20/02: Does the solution fit the problem?
06/13/02: Triggering unintended consequences
06/11/02: Democracy won, the president is saying to our enemies. You got a problem with that?
06/06/02: White House warnings were effective tactical move
05/23/02: Giving the Dems an education on education
05/16/02: Power to the swing voters
04/23/02: The secret formula
04/09/02: Politics Remain Stalemated
03/31/02: Values and gas mileage?
03/25/02: Truly oppressed minorities
03/14/02: Reciprocal hostility
03/07/02: Bush's prudence
02/28/02: Is the 'clash of civilizations' becoming a political reality?
02/28/02: 'Cowboy' or not, Bush has the 'axis of evil' running scared
02/20/02: Could it be that the era of Big Government really is over?
01/31/02: 'Daddy issues' grab center stage
01/15/02: And, they're off
01/09/02: Three 'War Stars' are born
01/04/02: California cluelessness?
12/17/01: Congress' life or death issue
11/27/01: Our reinvigorated spendthrift Congress
11/27/01: Out of War, Peace?
11/14/01: The other war --- the one for public opinion
11/09/01: The mayor of New Yawk and the King of the World
11/07/01: An insurance policy on America
11/02/01: A nation of defiant optimists
10/30/01: Has Bush has flip-flopped on 'nation-building'?
10/23/01: The new political world
10/16/01: The return of big government
10/08/01: On political war
10/01/01: The "born-again" president
09/25/01: Making America squirm
09/14/01: The American spirit will not wane
09/10/01: What Dubya knows about the budget
08/13/01: Japan becomes the latest country to see its politics become personalized
08/09/01: Bush backers out to remake prez yet again
07/30/01: Will the GOP's mandate of 1994 finally runs out?
07/23/01: Both political parties are full of ....
07/16/01: Empowered moderate Republicans
07/09/01: As goes New Jersey, so goes the nation?
07/02/01: Dubya: Like father, like son?
06/15/01: The new soccer moms
06/05/01: Deals or deadlock?
05/29/01: The War Between the States is heating up again
05/21/01: The answer is men
05/10/01: Bush v. Carter?

Up

© 2002, William Schneider