Jewish World Review Sept. 27, 2002 / 21 Tishrei, 5763

Drs. Michael A. Glueck & Robert J. Cihak

The Medicine Men
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | A year ago, the words "civic feminism" would have seemed a contradiction in terms, and a bitter one at that. After so many decades of gimme-gimme-gimme and boy-am-I-POed, of men-are-the-enemy and lawsuits-lawsuits-lawsuits, feminism - what's left of it - seems to have reached an unpleasant climacteric of viciousness and absurdity. Yet now comes a potential revival, avowing that the real end of feminism must be equality in civic responsibility and civic virtue.

Especially in time of war.

Philip Gold, an historian of American culture better known for his prescient defense work, is one of the first to notice this new wave. For decades, Gold described himself as a Keynesian feminist (after noted economist, John Maynard Keynes). "A Keynesian feminist," he explains, "holds that the supply of angry women vastly exceeds the demand." But that era, he feels, is fading.

According to Dr. Phil, until the 1960s, feminism tried to be about more than women. The suffrage part of the movement held that giving women the vote would improve society as a whole. Ditto feminist participation in the peace movement. It was nave and anti-militarist, but not anti-male or necessarily anti-military. Feminist Godmother Betty Friedan, in her 1963 "The Feminine Mystique," argued that feminism, to be valid, must ultimately benefit more than women. By 1981, in "The Second Stage," (the book that got her drummed out of The Sisterhood), she was deploring feminism's new and self-destructive selfishness.

So what went wrong? In a word, the 60s and 70s, which transmuted feminism into the politics of self-obsessed consciousness-raising, of dismissal of authority per se, and of a virulent man-hating bigotry that reduced the military to the last bastion of machismo, a nut to be cracked for the sake of the cracking. Lost in the obsession - the real needs of real women, the notions that authority and force can be legitimate, and that civilization is worth defending.

The new civic feminists are young. In many ways, they're far from conservative. But they're dead serious about one thing: the equality that comes from discharging their responsibilities as citizens.

One of the most articulate exemplars of this new wave is a radical feminist/former Army officer named Erin Solaro, 35. She's working on a book of essays on women and citizenship in time of war called, "The Woman Soldier." The standard screed this is not.

We recently spoke with Solaro and found her to be one of the most interesting and delightful persons we've ever interviewed. Her premise is simple. "We're in this together. Male, female, gay, straight, liberal, conservative, we all have a stake in this civilization. Women, too, have a political stake in its survival, not just a physical one. As citizens, we have a responsibility for the common defense, which we must discharge together with men, not expect men to do this for us."

Solaro, as expected, holds that women should serve in the combat arms. But the war on terror means that defense may take many forms, and women must not be excluded from these, either.

So what got her going? In essence, she discovered that the people who take her seriously are conservative men, often with military backgrounds, while The Sisterhood calls her a fascist and believes that feminists don't have to know anything about the military, just sneer at it. This led her to the realization that, although she remains liberal on personal and social issues, conservatism has a new relevance where matters of legitimate authority and communal defense are involved.

Erin and her compatriots hold that empowerment means more than just living their lives as they choose. It means full participation in a civilization under attack. And in the end, that common danger should affect private relationships as well, and for the better.

"We can view relationships between the sexes as a war, in which we live at each others' expense. Or we can build relationships, sexual and non-sexual alike, in which we do not live at each other's expense, in which we share equally, giving to and receiving from each other.

"It is genetically impossible for us to be opposites, and we have nearly eliminated that ancient tragedy of death in childbirth that is probably the root of so much bitterness between men and women."

Solaro concludes that there is nothing inherently incompatible with military service and femininity. Women with a military calling need not be forced to choose between their calling and their womanhood.

At this point, we can almost hear some muttering about new wine in old bottles. Nonetheless, there is something important here. Erin Solaro's brand of "civic feminism," insofar as it avows that we're all in this together and all responsible, is a far healthier alternative for the entire country than the weary, dreary, America-hating spitefulness of decades past.

It merits consideration.

Enjoy this duo's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.




Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Robert J. Cihak, M.D., is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both JWR contributors are Harvard trained diagnostic radiologists. Comment by clicking here.

Up

09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy

© 2002