Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World ReviewAugust 24, 2004 / 7 Elul, 5764

Bill Schneider

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Which way do you cut it? | We heard a lot of talk at the Democratic convention about two Americas. But which two?

John Edwards talked about two Americas divided by class— the haves and the have-nots. "The truth is, we still live in two different Americas," the vice presidential nominee declared, "one for people who have lived the American dream and don't have to worry, and another for most Americans, who work hard and still struggle to make ends meet."

Class division is a familiar subject for Democrats. As Edwards said, most Americans fall into the have-not category. Then-Gov. Mario Cuomo of New York said in his keynote speech at the 1984 Democratic convention that the policies of Ronald Reagan's Republican Party "divide the nation into the lucky and the left out, into the royalty and the rabble." Republicans accuse Democrats of stirring up class warfare and dividing the country.

The division that dominates American politics right now isn't class, however. It's culture. "Red" versus "blue" doesn't mean haves versus have-nots. It means conservatives versus liberals. Opinion polls show that more people call themselves conservatives rather than liberals. So this is a division that Democrats are quick to denounce.

"There's not a liberal America and a conservative America," Senate nominee Barack Obama of Illinois told the Democratic convention. "There's the United States of America." John Kerry echoed the sentiment in his acceptance speech: "Maybe some just see us divided into those red states and blue states. But I see us as one America— red, white, and blue."

Republicans demonize Democrats by calling their party liberal. Democrats demonize Republicans by calling the GOP the party of the rich. The two divisions cut across each other. There are limousine liberals and country-club conservatives— both rich. There are lunch-bucket liberals and conservative churchgoers— both less affluent.

Donate to JWR

Bill Clinton acknowledges that today's politics has much more to do with values than with class. And at the core of the values split is the 1960s. Clinton remarked in June: "If you look back on the '60s and, on balance, you think there was more good than harm in it, you're probably a Democrat. And if you think there's more harm than good, you're probably a Republican." It's a split between two figures who came of age in the '60s— Clinton, who sees more good than harm, and George W. Bush, who sees more harm than good.

Where does Kerry fit in? He told the convention, "When I was a junior in high school, John Kennedy called my generation to service. It was the beginning of a great journey— a time to march for civil rights, for voting rights, for the environment, for women, and for peace. We believed we could change the world. And you know what? We did."

Kerry defines the values of the '60s as shared values. "We believe that what matters most is not narrow appeals masquerading as values," he said, "but the shared values that show the true face of America. Not narrow appeals that divide us, but the shared values that unite us— family and faith, hard work and responsibility, opportunity for all."

Faith, hard work, opportunity, responsibility. Those don't sound like the '60s of "sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll." But the '60s were also about idealism. Kerry is talking about the Democratic Party of 1960 and 1964, not the Democratic Party of 1968 and 1972.

There are two more Americas in this campaign, cutting across the divisions of class and culture. On August 4, Bush and Kerry were campaigning a few blocks from each other in Davenport, Iowa, apparently by coincidence. A week later, both were in Portland, Ore.

The candidates are chasing the same voters in the hotly contested battleground states, two of which are Iowa and Oregon. Call those states "favored America," as opposed to "forgotten America"— the states where politicians think they know the likely outcome— like New York for Kerry and Texas for Bush.

A lot of the favored states are in the midwestern heartland, the part of America that snotty types from New York and California call "flyover country." Nobody's flying over it this year. The campaigns are stopping over in a lot of places that usually don't get much attention— places like Mankato and Le Sueur, Minn., and Sedalia and Smithville, Mo., which have received visits from one or both presidential nominees this month. If Kerry can hold down Bush's margin in rural areas, he stands a good chance of winning Ohio, West Virginia, and Missouri, swing states that went for Bush in 2000.

Hence Kerry's statement on August 4: "I think of Joe Jackson coming out of that corn and saying, 'Is this heaven?' and Ray Kinsella says, 'No, it's Iowa.' But it's one and the same to me." And Bush's statement the next day: "I envision a day where, some time, somebody walks in and says, 'Well, Mister President, you'll be happy to hear the corn crop is up, and we're growing more soybeans in America.'"

Voters in favored America get front-row center seats in this campaign. Pity the poor voters in New York City and Atlanta and Houston and Los Angeles. They live in forgotten America, a place where they won't see wall-to-wall campaign ads on TV, or get a mailboxful of fliers every day, or get endless telephone calls from campaigns and poll takers. How sad for them.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

To comment on JWR contributor William Schneider's column, please click here.

05/02/03:: Dems are more partisan than ever
03/19/03:: Feeling all alone
03/11/03:: Hussein and hope
02/13/03:: Leadership and legitimacy
01/14/03:: Dems can't afford to be bold
01/08/03:: How Bush will reclaim suburban swing voters: The evolution of a political party
12/19/02: Why Gore dropped out --- he never grasped one of politics' most important lessons
12/12/02: The emerging 'tough Democrat'?
12/06/02: Hispanic voting surprises
11/08/02: "President select" no longer: What have the Dems learned?
10/31/02: Can a party without a message or a messenger still win?
10/24/02: Fright Night may come twice this year!
09/24/02: The politically loaded question: "Why now?''
09/19/02: Pundits in the crosswinds
09/10/02: Has Bush lost his momentum?
09/04/02: Bush's European problem
08/13/02: Overdosing on prescription drug promises
08/06/02: The Dems' secret weapon
08/01/02: Time for prez to let Cheney go
07/30/02: GOPers, feeling scared, get realistic
07/18/02: Soccer Moms, say hello to NASCAR Dads
07/11/02: Israel via Alabama
06/20/02: Does the solution fit the problem?
06/13/02: Triggering unintended consequences
06/11/02: Democracy won, the president is saying to our enemies. You got a problem with that?
06/06/02: White House warnings were effective tactical move
05/23/02: Giving the Dems an education on education
05/16/02: Power to the swing voters
04/23/02: The secret formula
04/09/02: Politics Remain Stalemated
03/31/02: Values and gas mileage?
03/25/02: Truly oppressed minorities
03/14/02: Reciprocal hostility
03/07/02: Bush's prudence
02/28/02: Is the 'clash of civilizations' becoming a political reality?
02/28/02: 'Cowboy' or not, Bush has the 'axis of evil' running scared
02/20/02: Could it be that the era of Big Government really is over?
01/31/02: 'Daddy issues' grab center stage
01/15/02: And, they're off
01/09/02: Three 'War Stars' are born
01/04/02: California cluelessness?
12/17/01: Congress' life or death issue
11/27/01: Our reinvigorated spendthrift Congress
11/27/01: Out of War, Peace?
11/14/01: The other war --- the one for public opinion
11/09/01: The mayor of New Yawk and the King of the World
11/07/01: An insurance policy on America
11/02/01: A nation of defiant optimists
10/30/01: Has Bush has flip-flopped on 'nation-building'?
10/23/01: The new political world
10/16/01: The return of big government
10/08/01: On political war
10/01/01: The "born-again" president
09/25/01: Making America squirm
09/14/01: The American spirit will not wane
09/10/01: What Dubya knows about the budget
08/13/01: Japan becomes the latest country to see its politics become personalized
08/09/01: Bush backers out to remake prez yet again
07/30/01: Will the GOP's mandate of 1994 finally runs out?
07/23/01: Both political parties are full of ....
07/16/01: Empowered moderate Republicans
07/09/01: As goes New Jersey, so goes the nation?
07/02/01: Dubya: Like father, like son?
06/15/01: The new soccer moms
06/05/01: Deals or deadlock?
05/29/01: The War Between the States is heating up again
05/21/01: The answer is men
05/10/01: Bush v. Carter?


© 2002, William Schneider