Jewish World Review July 30, 2004 / 12 Menachem-Av, 5764
Debra J. Saunders
BOSTON Every time I like a speaker here at the Democratic National Convention, the delegates are less than enthusiastic.
Teresa Heinz Kerry, I thought, gave a pretty good speech Tuesday night, largely because her story is different and interesting. If she isn't likely to win many converts, I figured, she might snag a few undecided voters for the Kerry/Edwards ticket and this is a race in which every vote counts.
Yet as I left Boston's Fleet Center at the end of the would-be first lady's speech, I saw a pretty young woman in a pink dress. Pink is the color of the anti-war group Code Pink, whose followers stand on the convention floor occasionally displaying women's undergarments with the message that voters should "give Bush a pink slip." And the woman in pink was dutifully waving her "We Love Teresa" sign with all the ardor of a slow metronome. She should have had joy on her face, but she didn't.
The delegates, of course, applauded Heinz Kerry but not with the fervor they projected back at, say, Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama.
I asked a convention operative why the crowd wasn't going cheesehead-crazy over Heinz Kerry. He tactfully answered, "I thought the crowd was pretty energetic. It was sort of a lighter crowd than you'd normally find; usually the Tuesday crowd is a lot lighter than the Wednesday and Thursday crowd."
Nice try. But an e-mail memo sent out Tuesday by Tikkun magazine's Rabbi Michael Lerner of San Francisco offered this: Many delegates are anxious, Lerner complained, because, "Though the delegates overwhelmingly oppose the war, speakers have been warned to stay away from critiquing it, and so far, only Sen. Edward Kennedy, kept from prime time by the Kerry people, was willing to make a sharp statement of opposition."
Thus, the Democratic Party is at odds with itself: Its members are hungry to win but not enthusiastic about how they're getting there. Conventions usually fire delegates up, but many here instead have to cool their passions down.
You see, the nominee's support of the war has left his many anti-war supporters in a dicey position. They've had to decide: Are they more anti-war or more anti-Bush?
Code Pink's Medea Benjamin, a Green Party member from San Francisco, doesn't hesitate in her answer: "More anti-Bush." She added, "We've got to join forces now with all those people who want to get rid of Bush. It doesn't mean we don't put pressure on Kerry."
Rabbi Lerner lamented, "The war-makers in both parties should rejoice, but the peace forces are being isolated, all in the name of 'winning.'"
The Democrats have a great saying: Don't let the perfect get in the way of the good.
In that vein, the anti-war Kerryists must figure it is better to elect a challenger who voted for the war resolution, but then distanced himself from that vote, than to re-elect the incumbent who led America to war because he believed it was the right thing to do. But they can't believe it is really good to work for a candidate who has said he would send more troops to Iraq. It must be a bitter pill.
P.S.: Kerry running mate John Edwards voted for the war resolution, too. And the most he can offer is a script with the promise that, if elected, John Kerry and John Edwards will fight to make sure that "American soldiers don't have to fight the war in Iraq and on terror alone." (Excuse me, but U.S. troops are not alone now, but that doesn't seem to matter to this crowd.)
Allow me to correct my opening sentence. There was one convention speaker who was an exception: I liked her, and the delegates loved her. They loved her even if she didn't talk against the war in Iraq; she nonetheless enthralled the Fleet Center.
I refer, of course, to Ilana Wexler, the 12-year-old from Oakland who founded Kids for Kerry. As Wexler told the convention, Vice President Dick Cheney used "a really bad word" in the Senate recently, for which, she quipped, "I think he should be put in a timeout."
Wexler may not be aware that there are also Republicans who would like to see Cheney have a timeout because he's a drag on the GOP ticket.
And there is a downside to her solution: There are many on the left who, as I can attest from the e-mails from angry partisans and some genius who thinks I'm a liberal also deserve timeouts. So much for civil discourse.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.
Debra J. Saunders Archives
© 2003, Creators Syndicate