Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review July 15, 2004 / 26 Tamuz, 5764

Debra J. Saunders

Debra J. Saunders
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Nuance in the atmosphere

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | When Sen. John Edwards addressed the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board in February before the California Democratic primary, I asked him if he would ask the Senate to ratify the Kyoto global-warming treaty. "Yes," the presidential candidate answered. He then added that he believed Sen. John Kerry shared his position. Wrong.


The next day, when presidential candidate Kerry talked to the Chronicle editorial board, he said that he would not ask the Senate to ratify Kyoto.


Now, the Democratic Party has dropped support for Kyoto (a plank in the 2000 party platform) from the initial draft of the national platform for 2004. John Kerry, you see, is no Al Gore, who negotiated the treaty for Bill Clinton in 1997.


Still, it's easy to understand how Edwards, now Kerry's running mate for the White House, was confused.


Teresa Heinz Kerry demonstrates her husband's green credentials by boasting that he has attended more Kyoto conferences than any other major politician in America.


Many news stories in 1997 referred to Kerry's support of Kyoto, undeterred by the Massachusetts senator's vote with 94 other senators for a resolution that directed President Clinton to not agree to a global-warming pact that exempted developing nations. (Veep Al Gore ignored the Senate and agreed to a pact that exempts China, India and other developing nations from any pollution caps, while requiring the United States to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions to 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.)

Donate to JWR


At the February editorial board meeting, Kerry said, "I believe there is a formula to bring the less-developed countries into this solution. And that's what you have to do. You can't have the United States of America and the developed world reducing emissions, while China and Mexico, South Korea and other countries, India, just going crazy spewing about."


Kerry pledged to "immediately go back to the table and immediately indicate America's willingness to be responsible to engage in a legitimate dialogue about how we're going to do this."


While Europeans generally see President Clinton as supporting Kyoto — after all, his administration signed the pact — Clinton never sent the treaty to the Senate for ratification. Hence, it was never official U.S. policy.


More important, when Clinton left office, emissions were 14 percent higher than 1990 levels. Clearly, Clinton was never serious about meeting the Kyoto goals. Clinton, no fool, knew how compliance with Kyoto would damage the U.S. economy.


Emissions have fallen during the Bush years to 11.5 percent higher than 1990 levels. Still, some environmentalists privately agree that it is not practical to expect the United States to meet the Kyoto goals — although they believe Washington could do more to curb greenhouse-gas emissions.


Kerry has been highly critical of President Bush's unapologetic rejection of Kyoto, which so incensed Our Betters in Europe.


In retrospect, I have to agree. Bush could have given the pact lip service only — as Clinton did — and Europe would have been mollified. Or Bush could have sent the pact to the Senate, and watched both Democrats and Republicans reject it and take the heat of the (all-bow) international community. By being blunt, Bush unnecessarily alienated allies.


That said, it would be interesting to see how Europe would react if a President Kerry rejected Kyoto. Kerry says that, unlike Bush, he would rush to the bargaining table to work out a new treaty. But after they have spent years demanding compliance with Kyoto itself, would that be enough to appease France, Germany and the United Kingdom?


Maybe it would.


Maybe it is because Kyoto is more about hot air — bashing America's big cars and affluence — than it is about greenhouse gases. Maybe, if a top U.S. pol says nice things about Kyoto, that's enough. So if Kerry could fool John Edwards about his support for Kyoto, maybe he can fool the rarified minds of Europe, too.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


Comment JWR contributor Debra J. Saunders's column by clicking here.

Debra J. Saunders Archives

Up


© 2003, Creators Syndicate