Jewish World Review July 19, 2004 / 1 Menachem-Av, 5764
Endorsements not to be confused with rights
Whoopi Goldberg had been hawking Slim-Fast as a way to shed pounds. Last week, Slim-Fast shed Whoopi.
The company announced it would no longer use Goldberg in its ads, even though she'd been signed as a spokesperson eight months ago. The reason: Goldberg's recent comments at a fund-raiser for John Kerry.
According to those who attended, Goldberg appeared on stage with a bottle of wine and rattled off some comic double entendres about President George W. Bush, his last name and female genitalia. I'll leave the rest to your imagination.
The concert, featuring rock stars and celebrities, has become a silly controversy, with the Bush campaign demanding the tapes be handed over and the Kerry campaign trying to distance itself from the profanity but not the profit.
Whoopi, so far, is the only tangible casualty.
"We are disappointed by the manner in which Ms. Goldberg chose to express herself," said Terry Olsen, Slim-Fast general manger, "and sincerely regret that her recent remarks offended some of our consumers."
Now, this may surprise you, but while I staunchly defend the First Amendment, I have no problem with Slim-Fast's actions. Last time I looked, it's the right to free speech.
Not the right to endorse.
Now, I know some will see this as a Republican conspiracy, a sign of these political times: Keep your mouth shut or pay a price.
But what price? Goldberg lost an endorsement deal, not her civil rights. And let's be honest: Endorsement deals are a fairly dubious way to earn money. You are hired strictly on what people think of you, and how that opinion can be pasted onto a product in hopes of increasing its sales. It's not about truth, it's about image, a business deal based wholly on perception. If that perception changes, so does the value of the relationship.
Goldberg knew she was taking money for being a Slim-Fast endorser, just as she knew her riff at the event would find its way to the press. She proceeded anyhow. That is her right.
But it is also Slim-Fast's right to say that's not who it wants to endorse it. Slim-Fast is a diet product, not the Constitution. All Slim-Fast cares about is how many people buy its powders and bars. The product has slipped in the marketplace blame the Atkins diet and its executives are likely nervous about further erosion. Olsen only got the job a few weeks ago.
I'll bet his decision had less to do with supporting Republicans than with stocking shelves.
As of deadline for this column, Whoopi had yet to comment on Slim-Fast's decision. If she does, it should not be to complain. Celebrities make an implicit deal with product endorsements; they will remain the person people admire, at least the people likely to buy the product.
If, for example, Anna Kournikova began wearing long, conservative dresses and no makeup, you can bet she would lose her sexy endorsement deals. If LeBron James were to suddenly lose interest in basketball, he would not be hawking Sprite. We see what Kobe Bryant's extracurricular activities cost him in endorsements.
Apparently, Slim-Fast thought Whoopi's funny, self-deprecating manner along with her fluctuating weight would help push its product. But if people see her picture and think "politics," well, that's not the same as "get skinny."
And by the way, I don't think this was mere pandering to right-wing Republicans. There are plenty of Democrats who may hate Bush but still don't think it good taste to use a president and female genitalia in a comedy routine.
Those who support Goldberg can boycott Slim-Fast, organize protests, take out ads. That's free speech, too.
But let's be clear about what this is and isn't about. All Goldberg lost was something she had gained through similar actions: How she came across. She still has the right to say anything she wants. Except "Why me?"
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Comment on JWR contributor Mitch Albom's column by clicking here. You may purchase his latest book, "The Five People You Meet in Heaven", by clicking HERE. (Sales help fund JWR.)
07/12/04: Don't tell us, we'll tell you who's a leader
06/21/04: Coaching isn't a substitute for parenting
06/14/04: Hello, I am from Detroit and proud
06/08/04: A reputation ruined for no good reason
05/31/04: A quiet time for patriotism and reflection
05/24/04: Froot Loops, pancakes and caviar omelets
05/10/04: Why can't we stop bullying problem?
04/26/04: The professor stood for more than hockey
04/19/04: No time like the present to relive the past
04/11/04: Sister's family loves its piece of the rock
03/18/04: North and South meet at Western Michigan
03/15/04: Hockey could stop fighting in a heartbeat
03/08/04: Yeah, right, downsizing food is the answer
03/01/04: Lord of the Geeks
02/17/04: Want to get hitched? Not so fast, pal
02/09/04: Beatlemania still resonates
01/26/04: Fine, you have 110 percent of our respect
01/20/04: The sanctity of wasting our money
12/29/03: Anyone remember a concept called 'childhood'?
12/22/03: The I's have it
12/15/03: Life's brilliant on the other side of the pond
12/08/03: Squeezed by the politics of business
11/24/03: Celebs' misdeeds will make great tales for the grandkids
11/10/03: The butler did it! (But do we care?)
10/27/03: Parsley, sage, rosemary and time
10/13/03: The Kobe case: There are no winners
10/07/03: Tough choices in the not-so-amazing race
11/05/02: Everything is a billboard, even the cops
10/29/02: Nowhere to hide ... even at 40,000 feet
10/22/02: The pen isn't mightier than good sense
10/15/02: We turn our serial killers into celebrities
10/02/02: In Minnesota Vikings star receiver's view, he's king, you're dirt
09/26/01: The feds don't feel their pain
09/18/01: Some cling to life, others give it away
09/12/01: Worshipping a false 'Idol'
11/14/01: Patriotism is no excuse for stupidity
10/30/01: Dr. Dre: champ for First Amendment!
10/23/01: Terror is sugar-free
10/16/01: The army of the in-between
10/11/01: New war begins with delivery of darkness
10/08/01: Give peace a chance?
10/01/01: If this is supposed to make us feel secure, it isn't working
09/28/01: And our flag is still there
09/26/01: On the road to Ohio, life's little joys return
09/25/01: Our challenge: Not to change who we are
09/17/01: We can learn plenty from the horror
08/31/01: Back to school: Revenge of the boomers
08/22/01: The price of connectedness
08/16/01: An anniversary without celebration
07/31/01: Wanna name my kid? Pay me a cool Mil' --- OK, a half-mil'
07/25/01: Hey, there's no television on my ice floe!
07/10/01: When nobody knew what a Heisman was
07/02/01: Business opportunities for the empathy-impaired
06/25/01: Bunker mentality: At least Archie's meanness was satire
06/18/01: Famous fathers, eat your hearts out
06/05/01: 'No comment' on Bush twins is hard to swallow
05/30/01: Veteran scratches out the hatred
05/22/01: O.J.'s genius
05/15/01: No more kidding around
05/01/01: Haunted by the past
04/24/01: I WANTED TO BELIEVE
04/16/01: Before you file that extension...
04/11/01: Ever want to break an airport agent's neck? This guy did!
04/03/01: The best role models aren't on TV
03/26/01: CAN YOU GET ANY MORE ATTENTION THAN THIS!?
03/19/01: 'March madness' is aptly named
03/07/01: I'm sorry, I apologize, I beg your forgiveness
03/05/01: Young fans' web sites become a Big Harry deal
© 2003 DFP