Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review July 14, 2002 / 14 Tamuz, 5763

Editors of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate
Dictionary, Tenth Edition

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

"Lukewarm''; Where did we get the word "wig'' for a fake head of hair? | (KRT) Dear Editor:

I've always been curious about the term "lukewarm,'' meaning "moderately warm.'' Where did this word come from, and why isn't "luke'' used with the meaning "moderately'' in any other context?

_J.P., New Haven, Conn.

Dear J.P.:

The word "lukewarm'' has been around since at least the 14th century. It was formed from a combination of the Middle English adjectives "luke'' and "warm.''

"Luke'' itself had the identical meaning, "moderately warm,'' so you can see that "lukewarm'' has a sort of built-in redundancy. Exactly how "luke'' originated isn't known, but it is probably a relative of the Old High German word "lao,'' which, again, meant "moderately warm.'' It may be that "luke'' was combined with "warm'' to create a word that would distinguish a moderately warm substance from a somewhat warmer one, although that isn't clear.

"Luke'' has never meant "moderately'' in English, but writers have sometimes enjoyed treating it as if it did. A 1954 New York Times article, for example, mentions swimmers dipping in "luke-cold'' water. Such uses are few and far between, however, and for the most part "luke'' appears in English only as an integral component of "lukewarm.''

Dear Editor:

Where did we get the word "wig'' for a fake head of hair?

_H.C., Cumberland, Md.

Dear H.C.:

Donate to JWR

In the early 16th century, it was fashionable for women, and later for men, to wear a headpiece of artificial hair called a "periwig.'' "Periwig'' developed from the earlier "perwyke,'' a modification of the Middle French "perruque,'' from Old Italian "perruea,'' meaning "head of hair.''

"Periwig'' became simply "wig'' through what etymologists call "clipping'' or "truncation.'' These terms denote primarily the process whereby an appreciable chunk of a word is omitted, leaving what is sometimes called a "stump word.'' When it is the end of a word that is lopped off, the process is called "back-clipping'': Thus "examination'' is docked to give "exam.'' Less common in English are "fore-clippings,'' in which the beginning of a word is dropped, as with "wig.'' Very occasionally we see a sort of fore-and-aft clipping, as when "flu'' was derived from "influenza.''

Clipping is an ongoing process in the history of English. Its products tend to have a probational status at first - as when Jonathan Swift denounced "mob'' when that word was newly clipped from Latin "mobile-vulgus'' ("fickle populace'') - but may in time be absorbed wholly into the language. We may distinguish several stages in the process.

The most solid state of acceptance of a clipped form comes when many speakers no longer even know what the earlier and longer form of the word was. Thus "chap,'' meaning "fellow,'' no longer evokes its antecedant "chapman,'' an old term for a merchant. A "hack,'' meaning a cab, has for most speakers cut its historical ties with "hackney,'' which originally designated a kind of horse. Similar remarks apply to "pants'' ( from "pantaloons''), "cinema'' (from "cinematograph''), and many others. Status as a completely independent word is further enhanced when the phonetic substance of the word is also altered, as when "perambulator'' ( "baby carriage'') yielded "pram,'' not "peram,'' and "geneva'' gave rise to "gin.''

The status of a clipping is more provisional when speakers can in general tell you right off what word it was clipped from. "Exam,'' "gym, " "lab,'' "ad,'' and "mike'' are all very familiar words and must be considered part of the standard language, but anyone who knows the words at all can probably tell you where they come from, and the very availability of a recognizable longer source word makes their shorter offspring seem somewhat more informal. Just how breezily curtailed a word feels varies in ways not altogether predictable: somehow "math'' sounds more formal than "chem'' for "chemistry'' or "sosh'' for "sociology.''

Finally, there are clippings that are frankly slangy and not, or not yet, seriously applying for citizenship in the standard lexicon. Such are "vac'' for "vacation'' and "caf'' for "cafeteria.''

Like this column? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Readers may send questions to Merriam-Webster column, P.O. Box 281, 47 Federal St., Springfield, Mass. 01102. Comment by clicking here.


07/09/03: Why doesn't "Arkansas'' rhyme with "Kansas''? ; "Catawampus"; "Jimmie Higgins work"
06/30/03: "Foozle"; author who wrote an entire novel without using a certain letter of the alphabet?; "kith and kin"
06/23/03: "On the fritz"; "knuckle down''
06/17/03: How did "lazy Susan'' come to be used for the rotating tray?; woolgathering'' as synonym for "idle daydreaming''; "in harm's way''
06/09/03: "Clotheshorse"; a god named "Ammonia"?
05/29/03: With kid gloves; "receipt'' = "recipe''?; from soup to nuts

©2003 Merriam-Webster Inc.

Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services