Jewish World Review June 20, 2003 / 20 Sivan, 5763

Drs. Michael A. Glueck & Robert J. Cihak

The Medicine Men
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


The Medicare Mess: Will President Bush call Congress' Bluff?


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Way back in 1994, then-first lady and now Sen. Hillary Clinton, toured America to promote her plan to take over American medical care. One of your Medicine Men (Cihak), attending her Seattle appearance, encountered a middle-aged gent who carried a neatly printed sign saying something like:

"Seattle wants health care like Congress has health care."

Somewhat naively, Cihak assumed that the gentleman was against the Clinton health plan, which featured government-dictated coverage instead of the choice that our employees in Congress have. But when discussing the differences between the Clinton proposal and congressional coverage, both became very confused.

The sign carrier also became rather upset when he discovered that, even though he favored HillaryCare, he was actually protesting against it.

We relate this Amusing Anecdote in order to make several points. The first is that, when it comes to legislating health care, very few Americans understand what's happening — even political operatives printing up protest signs.

Congress, however, understands. For generations, they have engaged in the willful destruction of American medicine for their own selfish purposes: a process well-captured by historian Philip Gold in his forthcoming book, "Disaster by Design: The Death and Rebirth of American Medicine."

And for generations, too many "conservative" presidents and members of Congress have either gone along or tried to use medical issues to score points with the voters and play games with the opposition.

It's happening again: The usual pattern of doing nothing, then trying to outbid the competition, then rushing to pass legislation that will only make things worse.

This latest iteration:

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) provides a wide range of choices for federal government employees, all providing generous benefits. Not surprisingly, Congress has been reluctant to tell non-federal citizens about it ... although during the HillaryCare debacle, some federal employees demanded assurances that their benefits would not be reduced to the level Hillary considered appropriate for the rest of us.

But President Bush tried to call Congress' bluff. Bush wants Medicare recipients to have the same range of choices that Congressmen and other federal government employees have had for over 43 years now.

Now, bluff-calling has a way of turning into runaway legislation. And since President Bush has raised the issue, Congress seems set on ignoring it as it scurries to pass yet another of its "No Time to Read It, Just Vote" bills.

In a not particularly artful dodge, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., ranking member of the Finance Committee, admitted in a June 6 statement that "Some may take issue with the speed of our deliberations." However, "Sometimes there comes a time when you fish or cut bait. ... This year, the stars are aligned ... I have a good feeling about the progress we've made."

So, what's in this bill about which he feels so good and for which the stars have aligned and the fishing has begun? (Ah, such is the stuff of which mangled oxymorons are made.)

On June 12, The Senate Finance Committee passed "The Prescription Drug and Medicare Improvement Act of 2003" on a 16-5 vote, not available as a bill at the time of this writing. We do know that the proposal has several blanks to be filled in later.

We also know that wide choice for Medicare recipients is not one of the options. Rather, the proposal calls for the government to "pick only three low bidders to offer the private Medicare option in each area," according to a June 11 Wall Street Journal editorial, "The GOP's Medicare Surrender."

Bob Moffit, Ph.D., director of domestic policy studies for the Heritage Foundation, has been writing about the FEHBP for over a decade, and was once a federal executive himself. According to a June 6 WebMemo by Moffit:

" 'Competitive bidding' has emerged as a possible key element of Medicare reform. This approach is very different from, and incompatible with, the FEHBP model. Under competitive bidding, the government accepts what it considers the best bids, and allows only a limited number of providers or suppliers to participate. This may suffice for the purchase of desks, paper clips, or stationary. But it would interfere with a system of open competition and consumer choice, and lower the overall quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries."

Indeed, under the prescription drug coverage in the proposal, "Most employers will drop or scale back that coverage once they realize that the feds are willing to pick up part of their tab. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 37% of those with employer coverage could lose it," according to a Wall Street Journal editorial.

So, there they go again. As it has for over 50 years, Congress is rushing to pass what Congress wants us to think is a voter freebie bill but which will actually work in reverse ... all the while pretending that it has to rush to get it done now, don't worry about the fine print, it'll all work out.

But it won't all work out. This is the process that gave us Medicare, and HMOs, and might have given us HillaryCare.

Not for nothing do we call it "Disaster by Design."




Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Robert J. Cihak, M.D., is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both JWR contributors are Harvard trained diagnostic radiologists. Comment by clicking here.

Up

06/13/03: Diagnosis: School Insanity: A suit for sanity and school discipline
06/05/03: Soaring Medical Costs: Rational ignorance or rational enlightenment?
05/30/03: A Tale of Two Admirable Women: Jessica and Annika
05/23/03: Latest medical innovation: Cash
05/09/03: We feel your pain; Physicians have it too no thanks to the DEA
05/02/03: Medical Quarterbacking
04/25/03: CNN the "Conscience-Not Network"
04/21/03: Medical Miranda?
04/11/03: Are childhood vaccines shots in the dark?
04/09/03: The PETA Principle -- The lambshank Redemption
03/28/03: American conscience?
03/21/03: West Wimps or Wings: Treatment for Hollywood Hypocrisy
03/13/03: Worldwide schmaltz shortage looms --- all because of a featherless chicken
03/06/03: Legal metastases are killing us
02/28/03: Outside the Jury Box: Seeking Justice rather than a Lottery in Medical Liability
02/21/03: Workforce temperature rising; employer TLC in demand
02/14/03: Malpractice Insurance: They Reap What They Sue
02/12/03: Hawk, Dove or Groundhog: Diagnosis Critical List; Prognosis Uncertain
02/07/03: How about tax cuts for the "rich" and "poor"?
01/31/03: AIDS Bug Chasers
01/24/03: Libertarian moment or movement?
01/17/03: It's not just 'sue the docs' anymore
01/03/03: A pox on the critics; diagnosis sour grapes
01/03/03: If protesting is good for your health; then at least let's root for the home team
12/20/02: Obesidemic (obesity epidemic) or not?
12/20/02: Time for voluntary informed smallpox vaccinations
12/13/02: The real reason the state opposes homeschooling?
12/06/02: Conscience of a former conservative: Portrait of a political metamorphosis
11/27/02: Thanksgiving dinner hazard?
11/22/02: Time to think outside the box and inside the nucleus
11/15/02: The military should be protected from abusive environmental laws in times of war
11/11/02: Does Kyoto Treaty pose more harm than global warming?
10/31/02: Deep thoughts on Baseball, the World Series and Life: How about them Anaheim Angels?
10/23/02: "Pediatric rule" guinea pigs
10/23/02: Once the World Series ends, we need to create a Donnie Moore Day of Remembrance: Sports and mental health
10/18/02: Congress to senior patients: Do as we say not as we do for ourselves
10/11/02: Using pollution "scare labeling" to political advantage
10/04/02: The Great Asbestos Heist: Did Litigation and Junk Medical Science Helped Bring Down the World Trade Center?
09/27/02: The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace
09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy

© 2002