Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 17, 2002 / 6 Iyar, 5762

Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

While the cat's away.... | As certain as tulips will bloom in the spring, the United Nations will sponsor a forum that will spew nonsense.

Last year it was the UN Forum on Racism, Xenophobia, Intolerance and Dustmites, and this year it's the six-week session of the UN Human Rights Commission. You may recall that the U.S. was voted off the UNHRC last year (as good-guy countries Sudan and Syria enjoy active membership status). Until we rejoin the Commission during its next session, we are relegated to "observer" status.

At the Geneva-based forum, none of the Commission's 53 members offered a resolution condemning China's human rights record before the April 10 deadline. This, despite the fact that China's well-documented 2001 "anti-crime campaign" amounted to one of the harshest, most sweeping crackdown's on religion and free speech the country has ever seen, resulting in thousands of arbitrary arrests and summary executions.

Human Rights Watch, although totally whacked in its views on U.S. anti-terror measures, summed up the situation perfectly, denouncing the silence on China as a "lamentable lack of political will" and a "diplomatic fiasco." Recall that last year the UNHRC equated today's Israel with yesterday's South Africa.

So for the first time since 1990, China has altogether avoided facing hostile resolutions, and thus isn't even compelled to defend its human rights record before the UNHRC. (Although making a mockery out of the UNHRC in previous years, Beijing routinely used procedural maneuvers to block the resolutions from being formally introduced before the Commission.)

While the U.S. is a tad busy these days on the diplomatic and military fronts, the State Department should have submitted a statement condemning China's human rights record. Even more disturbing, however, is the EU's see-no-evil approach to China, given its willingness to jump all over the U.S. for the "barbaric" and "ghastly" treatment of the detainees at Guantanamo.

JWR contributor Laura Ingraham is the host of a radio show syndicated nationally by Westwood One Radio Network. Comment by clicking here.

04/09/02: Preview of 2004: See how Dick runs!
01/29/02: A kinder, gentler human-rights violator?
11/27/01: Military tribunals provide streamlined justice
09/07/01: Scariest animal wears pants
08/17/01: Depressed after seeing uncut version of Apocalypse Now --- and for good reason
07/20/01: The other, maybe more important, news
06/22/01: Washington's pro-Bono worship is unnerving
06/01/01: Burying conservatism
05/17/01: Ashcroft's abuse of power

© 2002, Laura Ingraham