Jewish World Review March 25, 2004 /3 Nissan, 5764

Terry Eastland

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Colleges doing away with their racially exclusive programs | Years ago, once colleges and universities had decided to make race and ethnicity "a factor" in their admissions, many of them cast about for additional ways to advance educational opportunity for minorities. So they came up with scholarship and financial aid programs, freshmen orientation programs and academic-enrichment programs, to name the most prominent. And they made sure that the programs were, as the lawyers say, racially and ethnically exclusive. Only minorities were eligible.

Now comes the news that colleges and universities are having second thoughts about the wisdom of retaining their minority-exclusive programs. Indeed, according to a recent story in The Chronicle of Higher Education, many schools have opened such programs to "students of any race." A trend appears in the making, and it's worth applauding.

Yale University, for example, has opened to all interested students a summer orientation program formerly limited to just black, Hispanic and American Indian freshmen. Amherst College has taken a two-day, on-campus program designed to give high school "students of color" a sense of college life and said white students also may participate. And St. Louis University has changed a scholarship program named after a former black faculty member so that it no longer is just for black students.

The trend now evident began before the Supreme Court's decisions last summer in the Michigan affirmative action cases. But those decisions are proving to be a powerful agent of change.

In the Michigan cases, virtually every selective college and university in the country advised the Supreme Court to declare as law what Justice Lewis Powell had said in the 1978 Bakke case: that educational "diversity" is an interest strong enough to justify the use of race in admitting students. The court agreed, and higher education rejoiced in its victory.

Donate to JWR

But the court also insisted that the use of race must be "narrowly tailored." Specifically, the court said that no student may be rejected solely on account of race or ethnicity and that all students must be treated as individuals.

The court didn't spell out all the implications of narrow tailoring. But the lawyers who advise colleges and universities are having a hard time believing that most racially exclusive programs really are narrowly tailored - and therefore legal.

What the court said is affecting how the executive branch sees the issue, as well. Government agencies that once gave grants to universities earmarked for certain minorities are starting to extend eligibility to everyone. And the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights has told higher education officials that "programs that use race or national origin as sole eligibility criteria are extremely difficult to defend."

The law, then, stands opposed to racially exclusive programs. And it's a good thing it does, for the country realized long ago that it was wrong to use race to deny whole segments of the population access to programs of general benefit.

Higher education officials will tell you that when they created their race-exclusive programs, their motives were pure. But too often the "help" can strike even those being helped as patronizing, and the race-based exclusivity of the programs can divide students.

It's better for everyone if programs are open to all and if eligibility is conditioned on race-neutral criteria, such as social and economic disadvantage. Texas A&M, for example, has taken the admirable step of creating scholarships for students whose families earn no more than $40,000 annually and who are the first in their families to attend college.

No doubt many schools that are opening their minority-only programs to all students won't follow A&M's lead but will make race "a factor" in some circumstances. Under the Michigan decisions, race may be used in that way. Even so, the court also has said that even that use of race "must be limited in time."

In other words, admissions - indeed, everything a university does - is going to have to be race-neutral someday soon. Opening racially exclusive programs to all students is a necessary step in advancing toward that morally worthy goal.

Correction: My column last week incorrectly stated the electoral vote for the 2000 presidential election. In fact, George W. Bush received 271 electoral votes and Al Gore 266. One Gore elector abstained.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Terry Eastland is is publisher of The Weekly Standard.Comment by clicking here.

03/02/04: What does a conservative beat mean for The New York Times?
12/31/03: America is right to press for religious freedom worldwide
10/22/03: Case involving pledge should be easy for justices to decide
10/15/03: Dean places political considerations ahead of national security
08/28/03: Colleges creating policies that discourage intellectual exchange
08/14/03: Progressive reform could end up limiting government
07/30/03: Congressman, please consult Miss Manners
07/23/03:Words reveal much about Bush: Maybe there is a reason he won't retract sentence
07/08/03: Justices also said affirmative action must end
06/25/03: Court's law school ruling isn't persuasive
06/24/03: Whatever the Lynch story, everyone wants it
06/18/03: A judge shows he can set aside his strong views
06/04/03: Boston church becomes politically important again
05/28/03: YWCA names culture warrior as its new head
05/23/03: Washington steps in to help teach history
05/13/03: It may take another election to change filibuster rules
05/07/03: Paige works to improve education from inside out
04/30/03: Iraqis have choice to make regarding religious freedom
04/16/03: Is it acceptable for an education secretary to state a personal preference for religious schooling?
04/08/03: University officials must put academics ahead of athletics
04/02/03: Support for our soldiers means support for their orders
03/27/03: 'Free Iraqi Forces' underscore Bush's sincerity
03/18/03: Dems misunderstand judge's job
03/13/03: Justices show right restraint in ruling on anti-crime measures
03/05/03: America's imperial intentions
02/25/03: The weakness of Dems' stated reason for their filibuster makes you wonder whether it is the real reason
02/19/03: Administration fine-tunes religious rights in public education
02/12/03: France and Germany need to be reminded of the necessity of a strong, even predominant America
02/06/03: Judiciary's 'balance' -- or lack of it -- is our doing
01/29/03: The child who almost wasn't
01/21/03: President decides to punt on affirmative action case
01/14/03: Bush's faith has influenced his conduct in public office
01/07/03: Dems need ideas, not more microphones
12/17/02: Gray Lady should learn that times have changed
12/10/02: Will High Court be guilty of activism?
12/03/02: The missing facts in news accounts of Saudi Princess Haifa's putative 'charity'
11/26/02: Americans don't have to be worried about Big Brother
11/19/02: Texas' reputation for flamboyance may be revised
11/11/02: Bush now can repair confirmation system
11/05/02: Dems shouldn't believe too strongly in history
10/30/02: Snipers had lots of motives
10/23/02: No one should be shut out of marketplace of ideas
10/15/02: Open hearings that could imperil the nation
10/08/02: Debating the clear and present danger
10/01/02: A great awakening in China?
09/25/02: Abortion, again? The settled but still unsettling law of Roe v. Wade
09/18/02: A relevant presidency--and irrelevant U.N?
09/10/02: Ashcroft's obtuse judicial statement
09/04/02: The Education Gadfly stings again
08/28/02: So then let the president declare war
08/21/02: Will Bush finally 'fix' affirmative action once and for all?
08/06/02: President must take up cause of Egyptian democracy warrior
07/31/02: With each war, civil liberties are curtailed less

© 2003, Terry Eastland