Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 12, 2003 / 8 Adar II, 5763

Joel Mowbray

Joel Mobray
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Pushing "peace" pushes war instead | Although many believe that President Bush's steadfast determination to disarm Saddam has made France and Germany's "peace" actions irrelevant, the peaceniks have actually managed to make a certain outcome more likely: war. By providing Saddam a ray of hope that the dictator can survive without effectively disarming, the doves have lessened the likelihood of a peaceful resolution.

That we are at the brink of war in the first place is a direct result of Saddam's refusal to comply with 17 United Nations Security Council establishing the terms of surrender for a war he initiated. Rather than playing cat-and-mouse with UN inspectors, Saddam could have kicked back at a Red Sea resort somewhere, sipping martinis or margaritas. Or he simply could have disarmed anytime in the past twelve years. But he has chosen defiance.

If war were truly inevitable in Saddam's eyes, then he would at least be more likely to accept exile to a neighboring nation, as the United Arab Emirates last month called on him to do. But Saddam is resting his hopes on the ability of the France and Germany to avert war. Iraqi officials--who stand on the same footing at the UN as representatives from free countries such as South Korea or Chile--have joined the Franco-German lobbying campaign to "give inspections a chance."

When--not if--the United States leads a coalition of the willing to disarm Saddam and liberate the Iraqi people, military efforts will be that much tougher because the repeated Franco-German stalling tactics have bought Saddam more time to fortify his defenses, not to mention house Iraqi soldiers in civilian neighborhoods. The more Saddam sees world powers rally to his defense and the more time he has to prepare to fight dirty, the less inevitable his ultimate defeat seems. That is why the Pentagon's top priority at the start of the war is to drop bombs so heavily that Saddam quickly realizes the inevitability of his own demise.

It's not hard to see why Saddam might not yet see the writing on the wall. Not only has he received repeated renewals of his "one last chance," but he has some friends in high places. France has announced that it plans to veto any Security Council resolution that could authorize the use of force--aside from Resolution 1441, of course, which did just that--and French officials are pressing the flesh behind the scenes to garner support for Saddam's cause. And doing everything to assist the Saddam-France alliance is chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix.

When his team stumbled upon cluster bombs designed to deliver chemical and biological agents and drone aircraft capable of doing the same thing, Blix tried to hide the damning evidence. His defense? That the UN team doesn't report "everything," and that, besides, the technology designed for the sole purpose of killing people with chemical or biological agents may have just been a "prototype." But when Saddam made the token gesture of dismantling the al-Samoud missiles--even as he continued to build the very same weapons--Blix beamed that Saddam was "cooperating."

Saddam's cronies might not realize it, but confronting evil has a successful precedent. Ronald Reagan stared down the evil empire not by acceding to its demands or giving it ever-more time, but by amassing the most awesome display of military might in the history of the world. When he announced his visionary strategy during the 1980 campaign, then-President Carter thought his opponent was loopy. Throughout the decade, leftists assailed Reagan for "war-mongering" and claimed that the arms race would provoke the Soviets to start World War III. But Reagan was right. And history leaves no doubt that peace only happened through strength--something a member of Carter's inner circle acknowledged to me recently.

Though the exact time frame is not clear, Saddam's days are clearly numbered. It might not be the "peace" the pacifists want, but Saddam's ouster will result in real peace for the entire world--especially for the Iraqi people.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Joel Mowbray is the author of the forthcoming book "Dangerous Diplomacy: How the State Department Endangers America's Security". Comment by clicking here.

03/10/03: One last chance --- for the UN
03/03/03: Democracy domino theory
02/28/03: $1 Trillion tax cut?
02/12/03: Saudi Slavery in America
02/05/03: "We're Going to War"
02/04/03: State Department's idea of a "traitor"
01/27/03: State's cold shoulder
01/02/03: Canada: The Weakest Link
12/20/02: Real Story of Yemen's Scud Missile Purchase
12/18/02: Lott's got the Senate in the palm of his hand
12/12/02: White House moves closer to finding Iraq in "material breach"
12/10/02: A 9/11 plotter confessed
12/06/02: Saudi Spin doctors dodge U.S. marshals
12/03/02: Wild, Wild Web
12/02/02: Justice, finally, for terrorism victims
11/26/02: Sue McDonalds? I Lost 80 lbs With Fast Food!
11/25/02: The State Department's spin machine
11/22/02: Finally! No more open door for Saudis
11/20/02: A defeat for border security
11/18/02: Trial lawyers vs. homeland security
10/09/02: The visas that shouldn't have been
09/26/02: The "right" Miss America
09/23/02: Tax Cuts, R.I.P.
09/17/02: Freedom denied
09/11/02: Iraqi roulette
09/06/02: O'Reilly the wrong 'Factor' in Saudi abduction case
09/05/02: State's war on Americans
08/09/02: White House wants replace 'Visa Express' genius with woman accused of not helping free kidnapped American kids in Arab lands
07/23/02: Visas for suspected terrorists?
07/03/02: Saudis Fueling Mideast Terrorism
07/02/02: Dick Gephardt, Wannabe Deadbeat Son
06/26/02: Open door for terrorists still open
06/17/02: Open Door for Saudi Terrorists
06/11/02: Sacrificing liberty and safety
05/29/02: Coddling Castro
05/20/02: GOP running from social security reform?
05/09/02: Arab (sky) High Culture
04/24/02: Catholic Church's real challenge
04/17/02: How do you say 'media-bias' in Hebrew?
04/09/02: Sexually Explicit "Abstinence" Education?
04/09/02: A price on the heads of Americans overseas
04/02/02: Bush's New Version of Compartmentalization
03/25/02: Homosexuality a Factor in Sex Abuse by Priests
03/20/02: Government's "Candid Cameras"
03/14/02: Happy Abortionist Appreciation Day
03/07/02: Let dissent ring
03/04/02: Is Ted Kennedy a racist?
02/26/02: The Audacity to Be Black and Conservative

© 2003, Joel Mowbray. Adapted from the February 24 issue of National Review