Jewish World Review May 26, 2006 / 28 Iyar, 5766

Paul Greenberg

Paul Greenberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The storm before the calm | What ever happened to all the fireworks that were going to explode at the Senate hearings on the nomination of Gen. Michael V. Hayden as the next director of the Central Intelligence Agency?

They fizzled.

The many-eared ogre who's been listening in on every American's personal phone calls turned out to be a calm, reasonable, eminently qualified four-star general who lived up to his reputation for quiet competence. His more aggressive critics had a lot of suspicions to air, but little evidence to substantiate them.

The general didn't so much confront his accusers as rise above them. Easily. Maybe because he didn't have a political agenda, or a load of preconceived judgments weighing him down. He just had a job to do, and he did it, quietly and competently, as he has done so many before.

It's a familiar pattern by now in our shout-first, think-later culture: first the storm, then the calm.

Remember those scare headlines about Domestic Spying? They turned out to refer to wiretaps on international calls to and from this country, not domestic calls. And the hullabaloo died down.

Remember the Big Story about possibly hundreds of thousands of phone calls having been "monitored" by the National Security Agency on Gen. Hayden's watch? It turned out to be about phone company records being run through a data-mining operation designed to detect any suspicious pattern of calls from terrorists to their accomplices.

The committee heard the details in closed session and seemed satisfied, although the public isn't being told the whole story — maybe for darn good reasons. (Loose lips sink security programs.)

Now the basis of that story has been denied by a couple of the companies accused of cooperating with the government in the interests of national security. (In today's political atmosphere, what might once have been considered a duty has become an accusation.)

The next "scandal" should break any day now, and, if the earlier ones are any precedent, its course is predictable: First will come the wave of fear and outrage. Then, as the facts come to light, reason will slowly emerge — like a sandbar reappearing after the floodwaters have subsided.

A country can tear itself apart only so long before regaining its balance.

Donate to JWR

The most revealing exchange during these hearings may have come when one of Gen. Hayden's more aggressive inquisitors — Oregon's Ron Wyden — aired the theory that the general had "simply said one thing and done another or whether you have just parsed your words like a lawyer to intentionally mislead the public."

Sen. Wyden was only warming up to pose his accusation and question: "What's to say that if you're confirmed to head the CIA, we won't go through exactly this kind of drill with you over there?"

The general declined to rise to the bait and get into a pointless argument about the insulting premise of the senator's question. Instead, having been asked what assurances he could offer his interlocutor, the general went straight to the heart of the matter: "Well, sir, you're going to have to make a judgment on my character."

Yes, that's what it comes down to in the end, doesn't it? The best guide to whether an official (or any of us) can be trusted in the future is whether he's proven trustworthy in the past — whether he's shown character.

The ranters and ravers can rearrange the facts to make them fit any scenario they have in their suspicious minds, coloring words to make them reflect their own dark theories. ( DOMESTIC SPYING! )

What defense is available to those whose duty it is to protect us? Only to patiently explain the decisions they've made, even if the explanation is a good deal more complicated than the accusation. Even then, much of the explanation must remain behind closed doors, for the enemy is listening, too.

It is a common fallacy to believe that truth is always simple, as in "the simple truth." Sometimes it's the falsehood that's simple, the truth complicated and difficult to explain.

During the uncertain interval between the time a sensational accusation is made and the time it is quietly dispelled, it's not easy to judge who is more trustworthy — the witness before the committee or his interrogators. But there is one sure guide in these matters, and the general alluded to it:


After the opening days of these hearings, his shines.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Paul Greenberg, editorial page editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, has won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing. Send your comments by clicking here.

Paul Greenberg Archives


© 2005, TMS