Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review June 4, 1999 /20 Sivan 5759

David Corn

David Corn
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Tony Snow
Michael Barone
Dave Barry
Kathleen Parker
Dr. Laura
Michael Kelly
Bob Greene
Paul Greenberg
MUGGER
David Corn
Sam Schulman
Philip Weiss
Mort Zuckerman
Richard Chesnoff
Larry Elder
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Don Feder
Linda Chavez
Mona Charen
Thomas Sowell
Walter Williams
Ben Wattenberg

Econophone

Gore to South Africans: Drop Dead

(JWR) ---- (http://www.jewishworldreview.com)
LAST WEEK IN ATLANTA, Vice President Al Gore dropped one of his big-think speeches, this one praising the work of faith-based social service outfits and calling for Washington to fund religious-oriented charities that assist the needy. This was, in part, a response to the values-first pitch of former Democratic Sen. Bill Bradley, who’s discomfiting Gore in the contest for the Democratic presidential nomination. The speech was also an occasion for Gore to trumpet his spiritual side.

“Without values of conscience, our political life degenerates,” he said. The Vice President hailed the “hunger for goodness” among Americans, declaring, “A politics of community can be strengthened when we are not afraid to make connections between spirituality and politics.”

Let’s hope Gore’s speech was not broadcast in South Africa: Millions of HIV-infected poor people would’ve had good reason to choke if they’d heard Gore express these noble sentiments. The spirit-filled Veep has helped pharmaceutical companies deny South Africans easier access to anti-AIDS drugs.

Two years ago, in South Africa—where as many as one-quarter of pregnant mothers in some areas are HIV-positive—President Nelson Mandela signed into a law a measure that would allow South African firms to manufacture low-cost generic versions of the high-priced AIDS-busting drugs produced and sold by major Western drug companies. Under international trade rules, a country can engage in such “compulsory licensing” to combat a national emergency.

With 22.5 million people living with AIDS in sub-Sahara Africa, the emergency seems real enough. The law also would permit the country to buy drugs when they are found to be cheaper in other nations and import them to South Africa, a practice called parallel importing.

(Drug manufacturers often sell their products at different prices in different nations, with the cost varying by as much as a factor of 10.)

Not surprisingly, the transnational drug companies were not keen on this legislation. They fear their profits will be undermined by a gray market of low-cost AIDS drugs, which can run $10,000 a year. (Average annual income in South Africa: $2600.) The drugmakers scurried to try to block the law in South African courts. In the United States, they turned to the Clinton-Gore administration for help. The White House obliged, threatening South Africa with sanctions if it does not yield. The drug industry found a friend in Gore, who, as chairman of the United States/South Africa Binational Commission, has leaned on the South Africans to repeal the medicines law.

The administration has been quite forceful in this campaign. On April 30, the U.S. Trade Representative placed South Africa on its “watch list” for unfair trade practices, citing Pretoria for its attempt to abrogate patent rights. One of the charges in the USTR’s report was that South African “representatives have led a faction of nations in the World Health Organization (WHO) in calling for a reduction in the level of protection provided for pharmaceuticals.”

Since when, in the face of a global public health crisis, is speaking out at international organizations for affordable drugs an unfair trade practice? It’s telling that the administration has not sought to pursue its complaint before the World Trade Organization, where a trade gripe of this sort ought to be registered. Presumably, this is because the administration’s case is not strong enough to win a favorable WTO ruling. Instead, the Clinton-Gore gang has chosen to exert political pressure. It’s possible that the drug manufacturers have a legal argument, and not just greed, on their side. But if that were the case, Gore should let the appropriate international tribunals resolve the matter rather than act as an enforcer for the industry.

On April 8, consumer advocate Ralph Nader and James Love, who runs the Nader-founded Consumer Project on Technology, wrote to Gore, accusing him of having “engaged in an astonishing array of bullying tactics to prevent South Africa from implementing policies, legal under the rules of the WTO, that are designed to expand access to HIV/AIDS drugs.” The two noted that several European nations maintain extensive trade in parallel imports of pharmaceutical drugs and that the United States itself has issued compulsory licenses on pharmaceutical products. “It is gross hypocrisy,” they said, “to act as if South Africa is an outlaw in the world community because it is considering the use of compulsory licensing for essential medicines... Africa is confronted with a public health crisis of historical proportions. Of course South Africa should use compulsory licensing to expand access to essential medicines... Why should President Nelson Mandela, Deputy President Thabo Mbeki and Dr. Nkosazana Zuma [the Health Minister] permit their population to be defenseless simply because Glaxo Wellcome and Bristol-Myers Squibb want the power to set prices for US taxpayer funded and government developed HIV/AIDS drugs in Africa?” The United States, they added, “is literally asking South Africa to abandon the lives of millions of infected citizens in order to receive reductions in US barriers to trade or economic aid.” They called for the administration to consult with public health groups regarding this controversy.

Gore, as of last week, hadn’t written back. He may have been too busy hungering for goodness.


You’ll Never Eat Dinner In This Town Again


In the most recent issue of George—the one with the obligatory Star Wars tie-in cover shot of Liam Neeson—Ann Coulter contributed a column as thin as her frame that daringly takes on that pressing issue of dating in Washington. The right-wing commentator and the author of a book arguing for Bill Clinton’s impeachment reaches the stunning conclusion that men in Washington are not as adept at asking out women as their fellow XYers in New York. The piece was a meager swing at that hackneyed column topic: Washington-vs.-New York.

It’s not worth engaging Coulter on her basic premise, but it’s clear she knows nothing about the nation’s capital when she observes—for no apparent reason—that Washington restaurants “close at 8 P.M. A few really, late-night places stay open until 9 or 10, but even these sometimes close unexpectedly at 8... [E]veryone is home watching TV all the time.” That’s about as wrong an observation as a sentient person can make. Trust me, Washington does not shut down by the time Crossfire ends. Its restaurants remain open far into the night, some serving beyond Larry King Live and up until Nightline. Has Coulter never visited the neighborhoods of Adams-Morgan or DuPont Circle once the sun has slipped from the sky? Certainly, John Kennedy and other staff members of the magazine have dined in Washington. So why didn’t they catch this flagrant error?

The closing time for DC restaurants is not an important matter (except for gourmands who reside in Washington), but Coulter’s cavalier dissemination of this misinformation does provoke wonder about how she handles other facts in her book and columns. In any event, Coulter does need to get out more. With or without a date.


JWR contributor David Corn, Washington Editor of The Nation, writes the "Loyal Opposition" column for The New York Press.

Up

06/02/99: Gone Fishin’
05/28/99: It’s in The Water
05/26/99: Pistol-Whipped
05/20/99: Combat Pay
05/19/99: Meet the New Boss
05/14/99: A 37-Year Losing Streak
05/12/99: Funds Before Guns
05/07/99: Missing In Action
05/05/99: Gun Shy
04/30/99: A Flyover War
04/28/99: Darwin Made Me Do It
04/16/99: Spin to Sell
04/16/99: No Controlling Authority
04/16/99: Damage Done
04/14/99: No Left Churn
04/12/99: Clinton’s Policy Bombs
04/09/99: A Cuban Frost
04/05/99: Coups and Fibbers
03/31/99: The Flynt Fizzle
03/24/99: Liddy and St. Steve
03/19/99: Hope in Hollywood
03/12/99: Clinton: The Novel
03/08/99: A Tale of Two Clintons
03/04/99: ..and Dumber
03/01/99: Post-Mortem Ad Nauseam
02/25/99: What’s Next?


©1999, David Corn