Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 10, 2000 / 11 Tishrei 5760

John Leo

John Leo
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

A tempest in an ink pot

No, parents are not upset about tough school exams -- IS A MAJOR REVOLT against school testing and standards under way? Yes, but only in the media. "An anti-test backlash is escalating," a breathless report in the San Jose Mercury News said last week. In California, some fearful teachers and administrators are urging parents to keep their children home when tests are given under the state's three-year-old accountability program. The dean of the education school at the University of California-Berkeley is among the rebels. No surprise there. The ed schools are the cathedrals of self-esteem and unconditional validation of all students, including those about to earn diplomas that they can't read. As a rule of thumb, no education reform is truly worth supporting unless the ed schools resist it.

"Parents are listening up" when the anti-testing administrators and teachers preach resistance, according to the Mercury News. But this is contradicted by discouraging news buried in the middle of the article. It turns out that when you add all the rebel parents to all the rebel educators, it comes to only "several hundred" people in a state with about 8,600 public schools and a population of 34 million. Despite instructions from rebel leaders, only 1 percent to 2 percent of parents refused to have their children tested last spring. This bad news for the revolution is given a nice spin in the article's next line: "But critics say that statistic doesn't reflect the magnitude of opposition from teachers, administrators, and education professors." The backlash is so big we can't even describe it. Some scattered good news for discouraged rebels follows, including word that "huge numbers of parents" refused to have their children tested in one elementary school in Saratoga, Calif. This massive upheaval at one school is pointed out twice, so it must be significant.

What parents want. Here's a reality check on the backlash: Last week Public Agenda, a nonpartisan research group, released a nationwide poll of parents showing a massive consensus in favor of reform. "There is not anything that suggests a backlash or that a broad group of parents is dissatisfied," a spokesman says. Of the parents who knew about the drive for higher standards and testing in their school district, only 2 percent want to go back to the old ways. A total of 87 percent want to go ahead with plans to raise standards, either as announced in their area (53 percent) or with adjustments (34 percent). Only 18 percent thought that teachers in their child's school "focus so much on preparing for standardized tests that real learning is neglected." About 10 percent of parents complained of too much homework, too much pressure, too many tests, or not enough extra help for struggling students.

A total of 80 percent thought their school district should require graduating students to pass a basic-skills test in writing, reading, and math or "a more challenging test" before granting diplomas, but 78 percent drew a line by opposing the sole use of a single test to determine graduation or promotion. (The Boston Globe made this the point of its coverage, under the wildly misleading headline: "Testing Rapped in Survey.") "Our numbers aren't iffy at all," says Deborah Wadsworth, president of Public Agenda. "They do not support the story of a backlash that is gradually being reiterated again and again."

Backlash reiteration boomed last June around graduation time, then resumed again in September as pickets and protesters complained in many states. Diane Ravitch, a former assistant secretary of education and author of Left Back, a new history of American schooling, calls the protesters "the crickets"–few in number but making a lot of noise. She thinks that some of the negative media coverage of tests and standards may have something to do with the presidential race, since George W. Bush is so heavily identified with this issue.

Polls undermine the backlash theory. One released last month by the Business Roundtable, an association of corporate chief executives, showed that more than two thirds of Americans think students should have to pass a statewide test to graduate, with the number rising to 80 percent if students are given "several attempts." Two thirds of blacks and whites and 82 percent of Hispanics endorsed graduation tests.

A year ago, a poll of teachers belonging to a union showed strong support for standards-based reform. The Albert Shanker Institute reported that members of the American Federation of Teachers supported these reforms by a 4-to-1 margin, though support for testing was less enthusiastic–55 percent thought the emphasis on testing tended to narrow the curriculum. Opponents of standards reform commonly argue that it tends to stigmatize or harm struggling students, but the teachers strongly disagreed. By almost 2 to 1, they said it mainly benefited these students. This finding may reflect the belief that minority children, many stuck in bad schools, have the most to gain from standards reform. A Rand study found that the Texas reforms produced large gains for Hispanics and blacks.

The obvious is true: By an overwhelming majority, Americans are fed up with awful schools and want standards, meaningful tests, and accountability. Skip all articles about a backlash. It doesn't exist.

JWR contributor John Leo's latest book is Two Steps Ahead of the Thought Police. Send your comments by clicking here.


10/03/00: The Al Gore quiz
09/26/00: The sleeper effect
09/19/00: Baby-saving made easy
09/12/00: Line between reporting and editorializing continues to blur
09/05/00: In the key of F
08/29/00: Hollywood connection
08/22/00: Some friendly advice to the GOP
08/15/00: You can't make this up
08/08/00: The niceness strategy
08/01/00: When rules don't count
07/25/00: Anti-male bias increasingly pervades our culture
07/18/00: Banned in Boston
07/12/00: What Jacoby had to deal with!
07/11/00: Will boys be boys?
07/05/00: Partial-sense decision
06/27/00: Attitude toward death penalty gets in the way of facts
06/20/00: Double troubles
06/13/00: Fools paradise
06/06/00: Accidental conspirator
05/30/00: Faking the hate
05/23/00: Was it law or poetry?
05/16/00: Here, there and everywhere, people have gone bonkers
05/09/00: Tufts evangelicals are punished for acting on their beliefs
05/02/00: Elian's opera isn't over until nearly everyone sings
04/25/00: All the news that fits: The media serve up many stories from a standard script
04/19/00: Those darned readers: The gap between reporters and the general public is huge
04/05/00: Census sense and nonsense
03/29/00: Hollywood message films leave no room for other views
03/22/00: The Vatican confesses, but is it enough?
03/14/00: Watch what you say: The left can no longer be counted on to defend free speech
03/07/00: McCain's malleable messages
03/01/00: Bush's appearance at Bob Jones U. will dog him all the way
02/23/00: 'Multi-millionaire' show is new evidence we're insane

© 2000, John Leo