Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 31, 2000/ 28 Tamuz, 5760

Lawrence Kudlow

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Mr.G., you’re gaining on it -- IT IS POSSIBLE that the Fed is now using long-term interest rates as their new policy guide.

And bond rates over the past six or seven weeks have been coming down. Thereby signaling lower future inflation and a less sizzling economic growth rate.

Which seems to be okay with the Fed. So one implication of Greenspan's testimony was: no Fed tightening in August. And, second, if bond yields stabilize, or decline further, the Fed's tightening cycle is likely to be over.

Using bond rates for policy is a de facto price rule. Market forces, not Phillips curve, NAIRU, output-gap econometric models, will be driving Fed policy. Is this a good thing, or what?

Another way to look at it: Greenspan 10, main root-canal Phillips curver Laurence Meyer 0.

And let's give kudos to the man behind the scene, one Jerry Jordan. His heartland of America Cleveland Fed annual report, which trashed the Phillips curve, seems to be having a significant policy impact.

Now, before readers start climbing all over me for ignoring Mr. Greenspan's multi-page continuous ad nauseum GDP-parsing of flawed economic information from the Commerce Department, which of course is totally inaccurate because it fails to capture the New Economy software, Internet, wireless, biotech and nano-tech, etc., I acknowledge that the Fed still has some sort of economic speed limit in mind.

But, at the margin, it is plausible to surmise that long-term interest rates are at least as important, or perhaps more important, than the speed limit.

Anyway, the Fed chairman admitted that the economy (if only the old economy) is slowing. Though of course the slowdown story is, to use Greenspan's word, provisional.

The evidence on lower bond rates, however, is significant. Both 10-year Treasury and Baa corporate yields have declined about 70 or 80 basis points during the past six or seven weeks.

What's more, the so-called TIPS spread (10-year Treasury minus the 10-year inflation-indexed Treasury), a proxy for market inflation fears, has narrowed to 200 basis points from its spring peak of 250 basis points.

Prior to this, real inflation-adjusted bond rates had been rising. So the Fed reacted. In the chairman's words:

"As the financing requirements for our ever-rising capital investment needs mounted in recent years -- beyond forthcoming domestic saving -- real long-term interest rates rose to address this gap. We at the Federal Reserve, responding to the same economic forces, have moved the overnight federal funds rate up 1-3/4 percentage points over the past year. To have held to the federal funds rate of June 1999 would have required a massive increase in liquidity that would presumably have underwritten an acceleration of prices and, hence, an eventual curbing of economic growth."

I rather like this analytic from Sir Alan because at least it acknowledges that excess liquidity (created by the Fed) is the root cause of inflation. Not too many people working, prospering, producing, risk-taking, inventing or innovating. But too much money.

It could be argued that this is the classic Wicksellian" market price rule approach, whereby commodity and financial price indicators signal the central bank whether the discount rate is too low (excess liquidity) or too high (overly scarce liquidity).

If I had any say in the matter, which I don't, I would certainly add the gold price and the dollar exchange-rate index to the mix of market inflation signals. But the real long-term bond rate is vastly and extra-celestially and inter-planetarily superior to Phillips curves and NAIRUs.

So the Fed's tightening looks to be over. The futures market in fed funds is forecasting only a 10% probability of a one-quarter of a percentage point rate hike in August, and a 42% chance of a move in October. By then, I'll bet, long-term rates will be even lower.

With the Fed stepping out of the way, an important obstacle is removed from the long-term technology-driven productivity-enhancing capital-deepening bull market prosperity cycle.

Now investors can refocus on the tax-cut revolution that is sweeping through the global economy. Declining tax-rates will improve the entrepreneurial incentive structure worldwide and lengthen the long wave technology boom. And the stock market rise.

Good work, Mr. G, you're gaining on it.

JWR contributor Lawrence Kudlow is chief economist for CNBC. He is the author of American Abundance: The New Economic & Moral Prosperity. Send your comments about his column by clicking here.


07/26/00: Investor Class Rising
07/17/00: The rising tide of national prosperity is lifting all boats
07/11/00: On Soft landings
06/29/00: Is the sky falling?
06/21/00: Internet-more-important-than-Fed update
06/14/00: The judicial hacker
05/16/00: Front-View Windshield
05/09/00: Don't Overreact
05/05/00: Give it Back
05/01/00: Wealth and Capital
04/18/00: Growth, Freedom and the New Investor Class--Stay the course
04/13/00: Correct Value
03/28/00: Governments roil the Markets
03/28/00: Fed should keep its powder dry
03/14/00: Reduce Debt, Derail Economy
02/17/00: Unsettled
02/10/00: Bush's Footprints
01/25/00: To preserve its standing as the world's number one economic power
01/06/00: It's not the '70s
12/28/99: They missed it
12/23/99: Bonditos
12/20/99: Dracula's Curve
12/16/99: When Alan Greenspan sneezes, Wall Street economists catch cold
12/10/99: Y2K-Related Cash
11/23/99: Y2K Money: Inflationary or Not?
11/16/99: Investor Retaliation
11/05/99: Rosy Lives
10/29/99: Drain Reserves
10/22/99: Supply-Side Is Mainstream
10/14/99: Y2K will likely bring more prosperity
10/07/99: Clinton's tax-cut veto
10/01/99: What's really bugging the stock market?
09/23/99: Growth Trade
09/09/99: Bad Dollar Logic
09/09/99: Buttered bread
08/31/99: Bull Market Alive and Well
08/26/99: Let Prices Rule
08/19/99: Blame OPEC, Not Growth

©1999, Lawrence Kudlow