Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 25, 2005/ 18 Tammuz, 5765

Nat Hentoff

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Free journalism versus government support | American journalists owe a debt to Kenneth Tomlinson, chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a fervent purifier of those radio and television programs from liberal bias — particularly the cleansing of any criticism of the Bush administration. He has taught us journalists what we should have already known: no element of journalism should seek or accept government funds, from any administration.

Mr. Tomlinson has clearly shown that "political orthodoxy" is not the ideological monopoly of Michael Moore,, George Soros or Al Franken. But those communicators do not have the heavy hand of government to police public speech in order to help strengthen their political goals.

As what George Orwell might have called the Big Brother of the public broadcasting system, Tomlinson paid $14,700 of public funds to Fred Mann, a "researcher," to monitor present and past public broadcasting shows by Bill Moyers, Tavis Smiley, David Brancaccio, Diane Rehm (of whom Mr. Tomlinson professes to be "a great admirer"), and even the witty conservative Tucker Carlson. (His guests too "proved" to be suspect.)

If Mann or another "researcher" is to be paid to do an encore, I expect National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" — a source of many of my news leads — could be included for its illuminating June 20 report of Mr. Mann's methodology for ferreting out leftists.

NPR reporter David Folkenflik noted that Fred Mann "sorted people who appeared as guests on the shows into three camps: conservative, liberal and neutral." When Washington Post reporter Robin Wright showed up on "The Diane Rehm Show," Mr. Mann's investigative expertise marked her down as a liberal. The proof, according to Mann: "Ms. Wright's viewpoint was that U.S. intelligence was geared to fight the Cold War and did not adapt to the new threat of terrorism."


Worse yet, as Folkenflik added, Tucker Carlson was a host of interest to Mann because on his show, there were "more liberal guests than conservatives." Could it be that Tucker Carlson wanted to make fun of them?

To discover that Bill Moyers, on his weekly hour, was not an admirer of the Bush administration is like, in the old phrase, "shooting ducks in a barrel." I was a guest on that show once, citing the damage that certain sections of the Patriot Act and subsequent administration executive orders were doing to the Bill of Rights.

But I was also a guest on William Buckley's "Firing Line" when it was on PBS — a program I wish was back there again. And currently, Wall Street Journal editors and writers can instructively be seen and heard every week on PBS. Moreover, each night, on "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" there is intense jousting between liberals and conservatives.

Tomlinson is being so ham-handed in his mission to protect the Bush administration from dread diversity of ideas that I would think someone at the White House — or among the Republican leadership in Congress — would be at least embarrassed. After all, the president has said we should pride ourselves that in this constitutional democracy, our government is "transparent." Furthermore, it is demeaning to such forcefully articulate administration policy makers as Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice and John Negroponte to imply that they need Kenneth Tomlinson to buffer them against contrasting views on public broadcasting programs.

Donate to JWR

Tomlinson, however, seems to have no limits to his sense of himself as a commander of the president's Praetorian Guard. He has successfully managed to install Patricia Harrison as the new CEO and president of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Her credits for this prestigious post — as tribune of the free flow of diverse views to the public — include her previous services as co-chairwoman of the Republican Party!

It is as if George Soros were to become editor-in-chief of the Associated Press.

Long ago, during my unformed youth, I was speaking on a panel as an anti-Communist (having read Arthur Koestler's "Darkness at Noon" when I was 15) but wondering about the possibilities of "democratic socialism." A libertarian on the panel asked me how long I thought a free press would flourish under any kind of socialist government. Like a clap of thunder, I was awakened from my fantasy.

Now, under a Republican administration, "public" broadcasting is being investigated as if we were subject to so statist a government that we must be insulated from insufficient appreciation of this administration's virtues. This would be farcical if it weren't actually happening. But I am grateful to Tomlinson for illuminating the sticky strings that come with government financial support of the press — which must be free to be free.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Nat Hentoff is a nationally renowned authority on the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights and author of several books, including his current work, "The War on the Bill of Rights and the Gathering Resistance". Comment by clicking here.

Nat Hentoff Archives


© 2004, NEA