![]() |
By Rabbi Hillel Goldberg
Chanukah, it is said, commemorates a struggle for "religious freedom." This is true only if one abstracts from a specific event a
general lesson. In doing this, something vital is lost.
It was not "religious freedom" that the ancient Maccabees fought for. Nor was it the right "to pray to G-d in their own way."
That is the perspective of an outsider looking in. From the Jewish perspective, the insider perspective, the Maccabees fought
for the right to conduct the emotionally, physically and spiritually profound avodah, or "service to G-d," in the ancient Holy
Temple in Jerusalem, as prescribed by the Torah.
Chanukah is a yearning for the Temple, for the concentrated presence of G-d, so to speak, that is now denied to all Jews due
to the exile. Chanukah is not just a yearning for "religious freedom"; it is a yearning for the kindling of the Menorah in the
Temple. The smaller menorahs that we light commemorate the re-kindling of the Temple's Menorah.
In Judaism, holiness is centripetal, not centrifugal. The Land of Israel is central because it is holy. Philosophically speaking, the
holiness of the land is a conundrum. How can the Infinite pierce the finite, the spiritual suffuse the material, G-d be present in
land? Even if G-d, by some mechanism known only to Him, can render soil holy, how come only some soil, indeed, how come
only a sliver of the earth, the Land of Israel? Resistant as these questions are, they fix the Torah's claim for the holiness of
Israel, and ultimately explain the focus of Chanukah.
In Judaism, "holy land" signals the reverse of the equation of existence with expanse, the rejection of "the territorial imperative."
This concept is clarified by a midrash on the precursor of the Temple, the Tabernacle of Exodus (translated by Lawrence
Kaplan in Halakhic Man):
When G-d said to Moses, "and let them make Me a sanctuary" (Ex. 25:8), Moses began to wonder, and he said: "The glory of
the Holy One, blessed be He, fills the upper worlds and the lower worlds and yet He says: And let them make Me a
sanctuary."
And moreover Moses gazed [into the future] and saw Solomon upon the completion of the building of the Temple . . . saying to
the Holy One, blessed be He: "But will G-d truly dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain
You; how much less this house that I have built" (1 Kings 8:27). . . .
G-d replied: "I am not of the same opinion as you. But twenty boards in the north and twenty in the south and eight in the west
[will suffice for the dimensions of the Tabernacle and My presence therein]. And more than that, I will descend and I will
contract My divine presence [so that it may dwell] in one square cubit."
This, then, is the concept of the holiness of the Land of Israel. This, then, is the yearning that permeates Chanukah. G-d can
pierce the material world and select but a single patch of soil for His presence, which He can then simultaneously contract and
intensify, such that the closer the soil lays to the Temple, the holier it is, and the closer to the center of the Temple, the holier
still.
The exiled Jews' yearning for the one square cubit of concentrated holiness at the Temple's center is, in essence, a yearning not
for territory, but for G-d.
This is the nature, the content, of the religious freedom and yearning that Chanukah
Abstraction is a bane of Jewish existence. Since this itself is an abstraction, let us illustrate.
The Maccabees fought for the right to light the seven-branch Menorah in the Temple, to offer meal offerings there, to offer
sacrifices there, to conduct water ceremonies there. They fought for the right -- in terms of contemporary spiritual geography --
to go to the other side of the Western Wall. To go inside. To see the glory of G-d that intensified as the Temple's center, the
Holy of Holies, was approached (within limits).
The Torah's glorification of land is always the specific sliver of Biblically bound land; then, within this boundary (already tiny),
the still smaller patches that circumscribe the holy city of Jerusalem; then, within this city, the still smaller space at its center,
inside the Temple; ultimately, the one square cubit at the Temple's center.
For Jews, the territorial imperative is not centrifugal, but centripetal. The focus is not on possession, but on contraction; not on
land, but on holiness. Not on defense of a distant border but on the center, on Jerusalem, and, within Jerusalem, not on the
Temple but on the one square cubit at the Temple's center, its inner sanctum, the Holy of Holies.
JWR contributor Rabbi Hillel Goldberg is the executive editor of the
Intermountain Jewish News and the author of several books on Jewish themes.
